Patchwork reconstruction with resolution modeling for digital breast tomosynthesis.

PURPOSE Digital breast tomosynthesis is a relatively new diagnostic x-ray modality that allows high resolution breast imaging while suppressing interference from overlapping anatomical structures. However, proper visualization of microcalcifications remains a challenge. For the subset of systems considered by the authors, the main cause of deterioration is movement of the x-ray source during exposures. They propose a modified grouped coordinate ascent algorithm that includes a specific acquisition model to compensate for this deterioration. METHODS A resolution model based on the movement of the x-ray source during image acquisition is created and combined with a grouped coordinate ascent algorithm. Choosing planes parallel to the detector surface as the groups enables efficient implementation of the position dependent resolution model. In the current implementation, the resolution model is approximated by a Gaussian smoothing kernel. The effect of the resolution model on the iterative reconstruction is evaluated by measuring contrast to noise ratio (CNR) of spherical microcalcifications in a homogeneous background. After this, the new reconstruction method is compared to the optimized filtered backprojection method for the considered system, by performing two observer studies: the first study simulates clusters of spherical microcalcifications in a power law background for a free search task; the second study simulates smooth or irregular microcalcifications in the same type of backgrounds for a classification task. RESULTS Including the resolution model in the iterative reconstruction methods increases the CNR of microcalcifications. The first observer study shows a significant improvement in detection of microcalcifications (p = 0.029), while the second study shows that performance on a classification task remains the same (p = 0.935) compared to the filtered backprojection method. CONCLUSIONS The new method shows higher CNR and improved visualization of microcalcifications in an observer experiment on synthetic data. Further study of the negative results of the classification task showed performance variations throughout the volume linked to the changing noise structure introduced by the combination of the resolution model and the smoothing prior.

[1]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions. , 2011, Medical physics.

[2]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Metal artifact reduction in computed tomography using local models in an image block-iterative scheme. , 2012, Medical physics.

[3]  Howard C. Gifford,et al.  Penalized Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Improved Microcalcification Detection in Breast Tomosynthesis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  J. Terry,et al.  Three-dimensional iterative reconstruction algorithms with attenuation and geometric point response correction , 1990 .

[5]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[6]  T M Svahn,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  Enhanced imaging of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis through improved image-reconstruction algorithms. , 2009, Medical physics.

[8]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Image Processing: to Appear Globally Convergent Algorithms for Maximum a Posteriori Transmission Tomography , 2022 .

[9]  Olli Nevalainen,et al.  Algorithmic 3D simulation of breast calcifications for digital mammography , 2001, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[10]  M. Defrise,et al.  Iterative reconstruction for helical CT: a simulation study. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Zhengrong Liang,et al.  Detector response restoration in image reconstruction of high resolution positron emission tomography , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[12]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[13]  J M Boone,et al.  Maximum-likelihood x-ray computed-tomography finite-beamwidth considerations. , 1995, Applied optics.

[14]  S. Glick,et al.  Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2009, Medical physics.

[15]  B. C. Penney,et al.  A projector, backprojector pair which accounts for the two-dimensional depth and distance dependent blurring in SPECT , 1990 .

[16]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Spatial resolution properties of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction: space-invariant tomographs , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[17]  Dev P Chakraborty,et al.  Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. , 2004, Medical physics.

[18]  J. Baker,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis: state-of-the-art and review of the literature. , 2011, Academic radiology.

[19]  Ingrid Reiser,et al.  Comparison of power spectra for tomosynthesis projections and reconstructed images. , 2009, Medical physics.

[20]  James G. Nagy,et al.  Numerical Algorithms for Polyenergetic Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Reconstruction , 2010, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[21]  Wei Zhao,et al.  The effect of angular dose distribution on the detection of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2011, Medical physics.

[22]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[23]  J. Dobbins.  Tomosynthesis imaging: at a translational crossroads. , 2009, Medical physics.

[24]  Tao Wu,et al.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis. , 2004, Medical physics.

[25]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Optimization of Tomosynthesis Acquisition Parameters: Angular Range and Number of Projections , 2008, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[26]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  A Novel Approach for Filtered Backprojection in Tomosynthesis Based on Filter Kernels Determined by Iterative Reconstruction Techniques , 2008, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[27]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Grouped-coordinate ascent algorithms for penalized-likelihood transmission image reconstruction , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  Laurie L Fajardo,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[29]  H Bosmans,et al.  Measurements of system sharpness for two digital breast tomosynthesis systems , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  John M Boone,et al.  Characterizing anatomical variability in breast CT images. , 2008, Medical physics.

[31]  Zhou Yu,et al.  Spatial resolution enhancement in CT iterative reconstruction , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[32]  Ingvar Andersson,et al.  Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials , 2002, The Lancet.

[33]  Chuan Zhou,et al.  Multiscale regularized reconstruction for enhancing microcalcification in digital breast tomosynthesis , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[34]  J. R. Baker,et al.  Compensation for crystal penetration in high resolution positron tomography , 1988 .

[35]  B. De Man,et al.  Distance-driven projection and backprojection in three dimensions. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Selective-diffusion regularization for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction. , 2010, Medical physics.