COMPETENCE DYNAMICS AND LEARNING PROCESSES IN PROJECT-BASED FIRMS: SHIFTING, ADAPTING AND LEVERAGING

In times of increasing use of project-based structures, the capability of managing and organising projects becomes critical for competition. Previous research has documented the problems and possibilities of cross-project learning and various mechanisms that organisations can use to stimulate and facilitate learning. Moreover, research on project competence and project capabilities has positioned these capabilities within a knowledge-based theory of the firm. This paper tries to integrate these streams of research and attempts to broaden our current conceptual frameworks of how firms develop project competence. Based on an exploratory multiple-case study of six firms, it is suggested that a more fine-grained analysis of competence dynamics is required. We identify three different learning processes that contribute to the competence dynamics operating in project-based organisations. The first one labelled "shifting" revolves around the major shifts in the project operations of the firm. It is suggested that such major shifts play an important role in laying the foundation and rejuvenating the challenges of project organising. The second learning process identified, labelled "adapting", focuses on the continuous learning that takes place within project operations of the firm, between project generation, project organising, project leadership and project teamwork. The third and final learning process — "leveraging" — emphasises the role of knowledge transfer across projects; across similar projects, across different types of projects. It is suggested that empirical research into competence dynamics in project-based organisations should consider all three types of learning processes and further develop our understanding how these processes are linked to each other.

[1]  M. Arthur,et al.  Paradox in Project-Based Enterprise: The Case of Film Making , 1998 .

[2]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[3]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[4]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[5]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[6]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction , 1994 .

[7]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[8]  Rolf A. Lundin,et al.  Neo-Industrial Organising: Renewal by Action and Knowledge Formation in a Project-intensive Economy , 1999 .

[9]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[10]  N. Polsby,et al.  Case Study and Theory in Political Science , 1975 .

[11]  Sue Newell,et al.  Enhancing Cross-Project Learning , 2004 .

[12]  B. Cova,et al.  How to create competitive advantage in project business , 1993 .

[13]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  Managing inter-firm industrial projects — on pacing and matching hierarchies , 2001 .

[14]  Gernot Grabher Learning in Projects, Remembering in Networks? , 2004 .

[15]  A. Davies,et al.  Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: towards repeatable solutions , 2000 .

[16]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Project-based firms: new organizational form or variations on a theme? , 2006 .

[17]  A. Prencipe,et al.  Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms , 2001 .

[18]  Nancy M. Dixon,et al.  Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know , 2000 .

[19]  Andrew Davies,et al.  The Business of Projects: Managing Innovation in Complex Products and Systems , 2005 .

[20]  M. Hobday The Project-Based Organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems? , 2000 .

[21]  C. Midler “Projectification” of the firm: The renault case , 1995 .

[22]  G. Hedlund A model of knowledge management and the N‐form corporation , 2007 .

[23]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research , 2000, QMiP Bulletin.

[24]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Technology Integration: Making Critical Choices in a Dynamic World , 1997 .

[25]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study , 1999 .

[26]  Gernot Grabher,et al.  Ecologies of Creativity: The Village, the Group, and the Heterarchic Organisation of the British Advertising Industry , 2001 .

[27]  John W. Sutherland,et al.  Systems: Analysis, administration, and architecture , 1975 .

[28]  W. Scott,et al.  Tracking the Giant Corporation@@@Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. , 1991 .

[29]  M. Hobday Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation , 1998 .

[30]  George J. Stigler,et al.  The Organization of Industry , 1969 .

[31]  G. Pisano Knowledge Integration and the Locus of Learning: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[32]  Andrew Davies,et al.  Building Project Capabilities: From Exploratory to Exploitative Learning , 2004 .

[33]  G. Winch The Management of Projects as a Generic Business Process , 2000 .

[34]  E. Penrose The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[35]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[36]  Lars Lindkvist,et al.  Governing Project-based Firms: Promoting Market-like Processes within Hierarchies , 2004 .

[37]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[38]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  Clients, Contractors, and Consultants: The Consequences of Organizational Fragmentation in Contemporary Project Environments , 2001 .

[39]  J. Sydow,et al.  Project Networks and Changing Industry Practices Collaborative Content Production in the German Television Industry , 2001 .

[40]  Fredrik Tell,et al.  Managing Product Development Projects: On the Significance of Fountains and Deadlines , 1998 .

[41]  Jimmy C. Huang,et al.  Social Capital and Knowledge Integration in an ERP Project Team: The Importance of Bridging and Bonding , 2004 .

[42]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[43]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[44]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  DEVELOPING PROJECT COMPETENCE: EMPIRICAL REGULARITIES IN COMPETITIVE PROJECT OPERATIONS , 2005 .

[45]  R. Defillippi,et al.  Project-Based Organizations, Embeddedness and Repositories of Knowledge: Editorial , 2004 .

[46]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  Change and Complementarities in the New Competitive Landscape: A European Panel Study , 1999 .

[47]  Alfred D. Chandler Organizational Capabilities and the Economic History of the Industrial Enterprise , 1992 .

[48]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[49]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  Managing Complex Development Projects: Arenas, Knowledge Processes and Time , 2002 .

[50]  T. Allen Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[51]  Mats Engwall,et al.  Peripety in an R&D Drama: Capturing a Turnaround in Project Dynamics , 2004 .