In fatal pedestrian to vehicle collisions, accident investigators must attempt to reconstruct events that led up to the collision to determine liability in a court of law. In the absence of suitable video footage, the vehicle speed is calculated using particle-based throw distance calculators such as the Searle method. Until recently, no methods concentrated on the velocity of the crossing pedestrian, vital for determining responsibility. A new approach, the Pedestrian Crossing Speed Calculator (PCSC), which uses evidence left on the bonnet and windscreen along with pedestrian anthropometry to calculate a pedestrian crossing speed, has been proposed in a previous research, and validated against three real accidents where the pedestrian approach was orthogonal to the vehicle. The range of application of the PCSC theory is investigated in this paper. This study has considered 48 Finite Element simulations to further validate the PCSC against a saloon type and SUV vehicles. In the case of the saloon type, the PCSC theory for a pedestrian crossing approach angle <10°, i.e. a pedestrian crossing trajectory no longer perpendicular to the vehicle trajectory, has been fully vindicated. The study has also confirmed the PCSC hypothesis stating that for saloon vehicles the relationship between and increase in bonnet dent width was caused by an increase in pedestrian gait angle. The study also concluded that the PCSC theory was less conclusive in the case of SUV collisions. This paper confirms that PCSC is unique and can have an important role in the field of accident reconstruction and for law enforcement; with the potential to determine vehicle speeds from a known pedestrian crossing speed, which will allow the calculation of the vehicle velocity in the absence of physical evidence left on the road surface. Global Journal of Forensic Science & Medicine Volume 1-Issue 5 Citation: Christophe Bastien, Huw Davies. Numerical Validation of the Pedestrian Crossing Speed Calculator (PCSC) using Finite Element Simulations. Glob J of Forensic Sci & Med 1(5): 2019. GJFSM.MS.ID.000525. Page 2 of 1
[1]
John A. Searle,et al.
The Trajectories of Pedestrians, Motorcycles, Motorcyclists, etc., Following a Road Accident
,
1983
.
[2]
Dominique Cesari,et al.
Pedestrian-Vehicle Accident: Analysis of 4 Full Scale Tests with PMHS
,
2007
.
[3]
Denis P. Wood,et al.
Pedestrian and Cyclist Impact: A Biomechanical Perspective
,
2009
.
[4]
Robert Overgaard,et al.
Comprehensive Analysis Method for Vehicle/Pedestrian Collisions
,
2000
.
[5]
Koji Mizuno,et al.
Comparative analysis of vehicle-bicyclist and vehicle-pedestrian accidents in Japan.
,
2003,
Accident; analysis and prevention.
[6]
D. Otte.
Influence of the Fronthood Length for the Safety of Pedestrians in Car Accidents and Demands to the Safety of Small Vehicles
,
1994
.
[7]
Christophe Bastien,et al.
Validation of a Finite Element Human Model Throw Distance in Pedestrian Accident Scenarios
,
2017
.
[8]
Tsuyoshi Yasuki,et al.
Shigeta 1 DEVELOPMENT OF NEXT GENERATION HUMAN FE MODEL CAPABLE OF ORGAN INJURY PREDICTION
,
2009
.
[9]
C Bastien,et al.
An evidence based method to calculate pedestrian crossing speeds in vehicle collisions (PCSC).
,
2018,
Accident; analysis and prevention.
[10]
Xu Xu,et al.
Accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect for measuring gait parameters during treadmill walking.
,
2015,
Gait & posture.
[11]
Tsuyoshi Yasuki,et al.
Research of Collision Speed Dependency of Pedestrian Head and Chest Injuries Using Human FE Model (THUMS Version 4)
,
2011
.
[12]
Check Y. Kam,et al.
Kinematic Corridors for PMHS Tested in Full-Scale Pedestrian Impact Tests
,
2005
.
[13]
Andrew A Biewener,et al.
Muscle mechanical advantage of human walking and running: implications for energy cost.
,
2004,
Journal of applied physiology.