Cooperation and Decision Time

We review two fundamentally different ways that decision time is related to cooperation. First, studies have experimentally manipulated decision time to understand how cooperation is related to the use of intuition versus deliberation. Current evidence supports the claim that time pressure (and, more generally, intuition) favors cooperation. Second, correlational studies reveal that self-paced decision times are primarily related to decision conflict, not the use of intuition or deliberation. As a result, extreme cooperation decisions occur more quickly than intermediate decisions, and the relative speed of highly cooperative versus non-cooperative decisions depends on details of the design and participant pool. Finally, we discuss interpersonal consequences of decision time: people are judged based on how quickly they cooperate, and decision time is used as a cue to predict cooperation.

[1]  David G. Rand,et al.  Spontaneous giving and calculated greed , 2012, Nature.

[2]  D. Kahneman Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[3]  W. Brogden Annual Review of Psychology , 1957 .

[4]  David G. Rand,et al.  Social Environment Shapes the Speed of Cooperation , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[5]  David G. Rand,et al.  Reflections on the Time-Pressure Cooperation Registered Replication Report , 2017, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[6]  Jean-Robert Tyran,et al.  Second Thoughts on Free Riding , 2013 .

[7]  Clayton R. Critcher,et al.  How Quick Decisions Illuminate Moral Character , 2013 .

[8]  N. Srinivasan,et al.  Registered Replication Report: Rand, Greene, and Nowak (2012) , 2017, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[9]  A. Evans,et al.  The effects of observed decision time on expectations of extremity and cooperation. , 2017 .

[10]  Erik Wengström,et al.  Fast or Fair? A Study of Response Times , 2008 .

[11]  David G. Rand,et al.  Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  David G. Rand,et al.  Social Context and the Dynamics of Cooperative Choice , 2014 .

[13]  David G. Rand,et al.  Human cooperation , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  M. Heilman,et al.  Same behavior, different consequences: reactions to men's and women's altruistic citizenship behavior. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  David G. Rand,et al.  Reflection does not undermine self-interested prosociality , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[16]  David G. Rand,et al.  Fast but Not Intuitive, Slow but Not Reflective: Decision Conflict Drives Reaction Times in Social Dilemmas , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Commentary: Rethinking fast and slow based on a critique of reaction-time reverse inference , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[18]  David G. Rand,et al.  Cooperation, decision time, and culture: Online experiments with American and Indian participants , 2017, PloS one.

[19]  E. Bilancini,et al.  A Social Heuristics Hypothesis for the Stag Hunt: Fast- and Slow-Thinking Hunters in the Lab , 2018, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  David G. Rand,et al.  Cyclical Population Dynamics of Automatic Versus Controlled Processing: An Evolutionary Pendulum , 2017, Psychological review.

[21]  S. Sloman The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[22]  David G. Rand,et al.  From good institutions to generous citizens: Top-down incentives to cooperate promote subsequent prosociality but not norm enforcement , 2017, Cognition.

[23]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Response time in economic games reflects different types of decision conflict for prosocial and proself individuals , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  David G. Rand,et al.  Social Heuristics and Social Roles: Intuition Favors Altruism for Women But Not for Men , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  David G. Rand,et al.  Habits of Virtue: Creating Norms of Cooperation and Defection in the Laboratory , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[26]  David G. Rand,et al.  Why We Cooperate , 2014 .

[27]  M. Crockett,et al.  Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  Matthias Rieger,et al.  Intuitive help and punishment in the field , 2017 .

[29]  Fiery Cushman,et al.  Deliberation erodes cooperative behavior – even towards competitive out-groups, even when using a control condition, and even when eliminating selection bias , 2017 .

[30]  Guido Ortona,et al.  Is cooperation instinctive? Evidence from the response times in a public goods game , 2011 .

[31]  P. V. Lange,et al.  The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. , 2013 .

[32]  M. Zeelenberg,et al.  Decision time as information in judgment and choice , 2014 .

[33]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Science Perspectives on Psychological , 2022 .

[34]  L. Felkins The Social Dilemmas , 2015 .

[35]  David G. Rand Cooperation, Fast and Slow , 2016, Psychological science.

[36]  David G. Rand,et al.  Time Pressure Increases Cooperation in Competitively Framed Social Dilemmas , 2014, PloS one.

[37]  J. Maule,et al.  Is intuition really cooperative? Improved tests support the social heuristics hypothesis , 2018, PloS one.

[38]  David G. Rand,et al.  Co-evolution of cooperation and cognition: the impact of imperfect deliberation and context-sensitive intuition , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Rethinking fast and slow based on a critique of reaction-time reverse inference , 2015, Nature Communications.

[40]  Andreas Glöckner,et al.  Spontaneous cooperation for prosocials, but not for proselfs: Social value orientation moderates spontaneous cooperation behavior , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[41]  M. Nowak,et al.  Cooperate without looking: Why we care what people think and not just what they do , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen,et al.  Does Intuition Cause Cooperation? , 2014, PloS one.

[43]  David G. Rand,et al.  Population Structure Promotes the Evolution of Intuitive Cooperation and Inhibits Deliberation , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[44]  Matthijs van Veelen,et al.  A general evolutionary framework for the role of intuition and deliberation in cooperation , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[45]  David G. Rand,et al.  Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation , 2014, Nature Communications.

[46]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Uncalculating cooperation is used to signal trustworthiness , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  David G. Rand,et al.  Promoting cooperation in the field , 2015, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[48]  David G. Rand,et al.  Social dilemma cooperation (unlike Dictator Game giving) is intuitive for men as well as women. , 2017, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[49]  D. Kahneman A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[50]  A. Rubinstein Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: A Study of Response Times , 2006 .