Quantitative Analysis of the Parameters Affecting In-Cabin to On-Roadway (I/O) Ultrafine Particle Concentration Ratios

A mass-balance indoor particle dynamic model was adopted and modified to investigate how on-roadway ultrafine particle (UFP, diameter < 100 nm) concentrations and vehicle ventilation settings affect UFP levels inside vehicles. The model was first parameterized focusing on a mechanistic, simulation-based interpretation of in-cabin data reported in Zhu et al. (2007). Under three different ventilation conditions, (1) Fan off-recirculation (RC) off, (2) Fan on-RC off, and (3) Fan on-RC on, the modeled UFP in-cabin to on-roadway (I/O) ratios were found to be 0.40, 0.25, and 0.10, respectively, and agree with the experimental data very well. Then, analysis focused on how the model input parameters, such as ventilation settings, vehicle speed, filtration, penetration, deposition, and human respiration, affect I/O ratios in broader categories of vehicle cabin microenvironments. Under condition (1), the modeled I/O ratios increased linearly, up to ∼25%, within the literature reported penetration factor range. The I/O ratios were directly proportional to vehicle speeds and inversely affected by deposition coefficients. Under condition (2), the airflow rate of mechanical ventilation was the predominant factor and I/O ratio was inversely proportional to the airflow rate in the range of 0–108 m 3 /h -1 , and directly proportional to the airflow rate in the range of 108–360 m 3 /h -1 Under condition (3), the effects of penetration factor, deposition coefficient, and vehicle speed were comparable. The modeled I/O ratio was inversely proportional to the airflow rate from mechanical ventilation in the whole range (0–360 m 3 h-1) with 10–20% influence depending on the particle size.

[1]  Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen,et al.  Exposure visualisation of ultrafine particle counts in a transport microenvironment , 2006 .

[2]  Kenneth L. Heitner,et al.  Theoretical model for relating indoor pollutant concentrations to those outside , 1974 .

[3]  Yifang Zhu,et al.  In-cabin commuter exposure to ultrafine particles on Los Angeles freeways. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Yifang Zhu,et al.  Ultrafine Particles Deposition Inside Passenger Vehicles , 2009 .

[5]  W. Kreyling,et al.  Translocation of Inhaled Ultrafine Particles to the Brain , 2004, Inhalation toxicology.

[6]  Thomas E McKone,et al.  Indoor particulate matter of outdoor origin: importance of size-dependent removal mechanisms. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  J. Morin,et al.  On-road measurements of particle number concentrations and size distributions in urban and tunnel environments , 2004 .

[8]  William W. Nazaroff,et al.  Particle Penetration Through Building Cracks , 2003 .

[9]  Yifang Zhu,et al.  Seasonal Trends of Concentration and Size Distribution of Ultrafine Particles Near Major Highways in Los Angeles Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[10]  W. Nazaroff Indoor particle dynamics. , 2004, Indoor air.

[11]  Tracy L. Thatcher,et al.  Effects of room furnishings and air speed on particle deposition rates indoors , 2002 .

[12]  P. Lawless,et al.  Characterization of Indoor-Outdoor Aerosol Concentration Relationships during the Fresno PM Exposure Studies , 2001 .

[13]  S C Soderholm,et al.  Role of the alveolar macrophage in lung injury: studies with ultrafine particles. , 1992, Environmental health perspectives.

[14]  Andy Chan,et al.  Indoor–outdoor air quality relationships in vehicle: effect of driving environment and ventilation modes , 2003 .

[15]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Roadside and in-vehicle concentrations of monoaromatic hydrocarbons , 1999 .

[16]  David T. Grimsrud,et al.  Control of respirable particles in indoor air with portable air cleaners , 1985 .

[17]  M. L. Laucks,et al.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[18]  Yifang Zhu,et al.  Penetration of freeway ultrafine particles into indoor environments , 2005 .

[19]  B Fletcher,et al.  AIR CHANGE RATES OF MOTOR VEHICLES AND IN-VEHICLE POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS FROM SECONDHAND SMOKE , 1994 .

[20]  Dana B Barr 2006 – A year to remember , 2007, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[21]  P. H. Baker,et al.  Air flow through cracks , 1987 .

[22]  D. Pui,et al.  Laboratory and on-road evaluations of cabin air filters using number and surface area concentration monitors. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  David E. Burmaster,et al.  Residential Air Exchange Rates in the United States: Empirical and Estimated Parametric Distributions by Season and Climatic Region , 1995 .

[24]  Robert Gelein,et al.  EXTRAPULMONARY TRANSLOCATION OF ULTRAFINE CARBON PARTICLES FOLLOWING WHOLE-BODY INHALATION EXPOSURE OF RATS , 2002, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[25]  Nancy J. Brown,et al.  A Concentration Rebound Method for Measuring Particle Penetration and Deposition in the Indoor Environment , 2002 .

[26]  Scott Fruin,et al.  Mobile platform measurements of ultrafine particles and associated pollutant concentrations on freeways and residential streets in Los Angeles , 2005 .

[27]  De-Ling Liu,et al.  Modeling pollutant penetration across building envelopes , 2001 .

[28]  Robert Gelein,et al.  Role of the alveolar macrophage in lung injury: studies with ultrafine particles. , 1992 .