Learning About Educational Change Strategies: A Study of the Successful Propagation of Peer Instruction

Millions of dollars and uncounted hours have gone into the development of research-based instructional strategies for the improvement of undergraduate physics. However, many of these instructional strategies have extremely limited impact beyond the developer(s). Peer Instruction is the best-propagated research-based instructional strategy in undergraduate physics. We use case study methodology to construct the story behind how Peer Instruction became widely known and widely used. This case study uses interviews with the original developers and document evidence such as publications and presentations to build a rich description of the early events and propagation strategies used (knowingly or not) that have led to the spread of Peer Instruction. Peer Instruction's primary dissemination vehicle was story, through talks and the user's guide (which closely aligns with the talks). Further, many of the talks (perhaps as many as 600 in total) were given as departmental colloquia, thus leading to buy-in from departments as a whole unit. Finally, the Peer Instruction User's Manual gave potential adopters the tools they needed to implement it quickly and easily, and the team continually supports potential adopters on an individual, involved basis. These findings have implications for physics education researchers who want to increase the impact of their work.

[1]  Sheila Tobias,et al.  Revitalizing Undergraduate Science: Why Some Things Work and Most Don't , 1992 .

[2]  P. Varma-Nelson,et al.  Peer-Led Team Learning: Evaluation, Dissemination, and Institutionalization of a College Level Initiative , 2008 .

[3]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory , 2014 .

[4]  Renee Cole,et al.  Over One Hundred Million Simulations Delivered: A Case Study of the PhET Interactive Simulations , 2014 .

[5]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User's Manual , 1996 .

[6]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results , 2001 .

[7]  Jeffrey E. Froyd,et al.  Successful propagation of educational innovations: Viewpoints from principal investigators and program , 2013 .

[8]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[9]  Chip Heath,et al.  Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard , 2010 .

[10]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[11]  Five Claims about Effective Propagation From the TUES Project , “ Increasing the Impact of TUES Projects through Effective Propagation Strategies : A How-To Guide for PIs ” , 2012 .

[12]  Melissa H. Dancy,et al.  Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics , 2007 .

[13]  Susan R. Singer,et al.  Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. , 2012 .

[14]  Thomas A. Litzinger,et al.  The Complexities of Transforming Engineering Higher Education: Preparing for Next Steps , 2014 .

[15]  C. Henderson,et al.  Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature , 2011 .

[16]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[17]  Patricia Malone Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard , 2011 .

[18]  C. Wieman,et al.  Transforming Science Education at Large Research Universities: A Case Study in Progressxs , 2010 .