A modular, digital system, fully programmable and scalable for a multi-modality, open (to accommodate claustrophobic or overweight patients, with the option of closing the detector, to increase efficiency), 3-D Complete Body Scan (3D-CBS) utilizing both positron emission tomography (PET) and Computed Tomography (CT) in one unit with no moving parts, has been designed for VME and IBM-PC based platforms. This device fully exploits the double photon emission and allows for annual whole-body screening for cancer and other systemic anomalies; only 1/30 the radiation dosage; a reduction in scan time to 4 minutes for a field of view (FOV) of 137.4 cm as opposed to 55 minutes for a FOV of 70 cm; a decrease in examination cost by 90%; an increase in sensitivity, providing physicians with additional clinical information on a specific organ or area and contribute to the specificity in detecting and assessing cancer. These advantages allow for early detection-the best way to defeat cancer. The system collects digital data from multiple electronic channels. Each electronic channel carries the information (64-bit) of all sensors included in a given view angle of the detector. The 64-bits data packets acquired at 20 MHz by each channel with zero dead-time are correlated with neighboring information and processed in real time by a 3D-Flow DSP to improve the signal-to-noise ratio and extract and measure particle properties, resulting in the identification of the particles' position, accurate energy measurement, depth of interaction (DOI), and the timing measurements. A thorough real-time algorithm that best identifies the photons can be executed because the 3D-Flow sequentially-implemented, parallel architecture (SIPA) allows for processing time to be extended in a pipeline stage beyond the time interval between two consecutive input data. Very low power consumption drivers drive short, equal-length PCB traces between 3D-Flow chips, solving the problem of signal skew, ground bounce, cross-talk and noise. The electronics validates and separates events from the different modalities (PET/CT); PET events are checked for coincidences using a circuit sensitive to radiation activity rather than the number of detector elements. Both PET and CT examinations occur at the same time in a stationary bed position using a detector with a long FOV, avoiding motion artifacts, increasing throughput, reducing examination cost, reducing radiation to patients, increasing resolution, improving data quality, and reducing erroneous readings (false positives). The saturation of the electronics of current PET is eliminated by using a system with an input bandwidth of 35 billion events per second distributed over 1,792 channels. The output bandwidth is selectable to sustain the activity generated by the maximum radiation that a PET/CT should ever receive. The overall events are gathered by IBM PC or VME CPU board, formatted and sent to the image processing workstation. The entire system can be simulated from top level to gate level before construction.
[2]
William W. Moses,et al.
Conceptual design of a high-sensitivity small animal PET camera with 4/spl pi/ coverage
,
1999
.
[3]
R. Nutt,et al.
Testing 144- and 256-crystal BGO block detectors
,
1993,
1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.
[4]
D. B. Crosetto.
System design and verification process for LHC programmable trigger electronics
,
1999,
1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).
[5]
D. B. Crosetto,et al.
Real-time, programmable, digital signal-processing electronics for extracting the information from a detector module for multi-modality PET/SPECT/CT scanners
,
2000,
2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149).
[6]
K Wienhard,et al.
The ECAT EXACT HR: Performance of a New High Resolution Positron Scanner
,
1994,
Journal of computer assisted tomography.
[7]
T G Turkington,et al.
Performance characteristics of a whole-body PET scanner.
,
1994,
Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[8]
R. Lecomte,et al.
A novel APD-based detector module for multi-modality PET/SPECT/CT scanners
,
1998,
1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).
[9]
G Muehllehner,et al.
Three-dimensional imaging characteristics of the HEAD PENN-PET scanner.
,
1997,
Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[10]
M. Gusarova,et al.
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research
,
2009
.
[11]
R. W. Redington,et al.
Cardiac Computed Tomography
,
1979,
Optics & Photonics.
[12]
James F. Young,et al.
MicroPET: a high resolution PET scanner for imaging small animals
,
1996,
IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.
[13]
J. Lackey,et al.
CMS Calorimeter Level 1 Regional Trigger Conceptual Design
,
1998
.
[14]
P. Sheedy,et al.
Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with electron-beam CT.
,
1993,
Radiology.
[15]
D. Rader,et al.
Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium scanning: a review and guidelines for use in asymptomatic persons.
,
1999,
Mayo Clinic proceedings.
[16]
J.W. Young,et al.
Next generation PET data acquisition architectures
,
1996,
1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.
[17]
Robert G. Gould,et al.
A Proposed Dynamic Cardiac 3-D Densitometer for Early Detection and Evaluation of Heart Disease
,
1979
.