How do Latecomer Firms Capture Value From Disruptive Technologies? A Secondary Business-Model Innovation Perspective

To fill the research gap between extant theory of disruptive technology and latecomer firms' business-model innovation practices in emerging economies, we explore the new latecomer advantage implied in the phenomena of overshooting and nonconsuming. Based on inductive theory building with a comparative case study, we find that latecomer firms, though disadvantaged in technological capabilities and market resources, can successfully introduce disruptive technologies from advanced economies into emerging economies through secondary business-model innovations. They provide cheaper, simpler, but good enough products or services that ordinary citizens in emerging economies can easily afford and access. How do latecomer firms capture value from disruptive technologies within the emerging economies context? While articulating an appropriate value proposition that is attractive for local customers is of great importance for those latecomer firms, they should also fully utilize strategic partners' complementary assets to build a unique value network embedded within local infrastructure. Thus, those latecomer firms tactfully bypass the substantial first-mover advantages and global advantages of multinational incumbents, and leverage their latecomer advantages such as low price and local savvy. Thus, latecomer firms should not ignore those disruptive growth opportunities within the large population of mass customers and nonconsumers in emerging economies.

[1]  Xiaobo Wu,et al.  Accelerating Secondary Innovation through Organizational Learning: A Case Study and Theoretical Analysis , 2009 .

[2]  Xiaobo Wu,et al.  A model of 'secondary innovation' process , 1991, Technology Management : the New International Language.

[3]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[4]  E. Mansfield.  TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE RATE OF IMITATION , 1961 .

[5]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[6]  J. Barney.  Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view , 2001 .

[7]  Michael Hobday,et al.  Firm-level Innovation Models: Perspectives on Research in Developed and Developing Countries , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[8]  Kang Chang-jie.  Disruptive Innovation: An Appropriate Innovation Approach for Developing Countries , 2006 .

[9]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[10]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  The Role of the Business Model in Capturing Value from Innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's Technology Spin-Off Companies , 2002 .

[11]  Yu Dan,et al.  A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory , 2008, PICMET '08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[12]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[13]  J. Utterback,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: An Expanded View , 2005, Digital Disruptive Innovation.

[14]  Wu Xiao-bo,et al.  The Evolution of Technological Capabilities at Chery Automobile: A Dynamic Resource-based Analysis , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering.

[15]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[16]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive innovation in health care delivery: a framework for business-model innovation. , 2008, Health affairs.

[17]  David M Levinson,et al.  First Mover Advantages , 2011 .

[18]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Ongoing Process of Building a Theory of Disruption , 2006 .

[19]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[20]  Edwin R. Otto.  Innovation: The Attacker's Advantage , 1986 .

[21]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[22]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[23]  Suleiman K. Kassicieh,et al.  Introduction to the special cluster on the commercialization of disruptive technologies and discontinuous innovations , 2002 .

[24]  Dong-Sung Cho,et al.  Latecomer Strategies: Evidence From the Semiconductor Industry in Japan and Korea , 1998 .

[25]  Linsu Kim,et al.  Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning , 1997 .

[26]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  Differentiating market strategies for disruptive technologies , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[27]  Paul J. McWhorter,et al.  Factors differentiating the commercialization of disruptive and sustaining technologies , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[28]  L. V. D. Heyden,et al.  Toward a Theory of Business Model Innovation within Incumbent Firms , 2009 .

[29]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  The Cycles of Theory Building in Management Research , 2005 .

[30]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view , 1998 .

[31]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Strategy in Emerging Economies , 2000 .

[32]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Strategy Research in Emerging Economies: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom , 2005 .

[33]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Innovating to Create Value for the Mass Customers in Developing Countries: New Dimensions of Secondary Innovation , 2006, 2006 Technology Management for the Global Future - PICMET 2006 Conference.

[34]  Clayton M. Christensen.  EXPLORING THE LIMITS OF THE TECHNOLOGY S‐CURVE. PART II: ARCHITECTURAL TECHNOLOGIES , 1992 .

[35]  J. Bain.  Barriers to new competition , 1957 .

[36]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  Guest editorial a practitioner's view: evolutionary stages of disruptive technologies , 2002 .

[37]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[38]  John A. Mathews,et al.  Competitive Advantages of the Latecomer Firm: A Resource-Based Account of Industrial Catch-Up Strategies , 2002 .

[39]  Carol Bruckner Coles,et al.  The ultimate competitive advantage of continuing business model innovation , 2003 .

[40]  Clayton M. Christensen.  EXPLORING THE LIMITS OF THE TECHNOLOGY S‐CURVE. PART I: COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES , 1992 .

[41]  S. Walsh,et al.  The role of small firms in the transfer of disruptive technologies , 2002 .

[42]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  First-Mover Advantage: A Synthesis, Conceptual Framework, and Research Propositions , 1992 .

[43]  Rosalie L. Tung,et al.  International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective , 2007 .

[44]  Yves Pigneur,et al.  Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Erwin Danneels.  Disruptive Technology Reconsidered: A Critique and Research Agenda , 2004 .

[46]  Raimar Richers.  The theory of economic development , 1961 .

[47]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  The Great Leap: Driving Innovation From the Base of the Pyramid , 2002 .

[48]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Reinventing Your Business Model , 2008 .

[49]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[50]  Rajiv Krishnan Kozhikode,et al.  Knowledge management and innovation strategy: The challenge for latecomers in emerging economies , 2008 .

[51]  Renée Mauborgne,et al.  Blue ocean strategy. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[52]  Cheng-Hua Tzeng,et al.  Developing high-technology latecomer firms to compete internationally: A three-sector growth model , 2008 .

[53]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[54]  C. Markides.  Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory* , 2006 .

[55]  J. Mathews.  Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization , 2006 .

[56]  J. Fagerberg.  Innovation: A Guide to the Literature , 2003 .

[57]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[58]  Matthew S. Olson,et al.  Cuando el crecimiento se estanca , 2008 .

[59]  F. Rothaermel.  Strategic Management Journal Research Note Incumbent's Advantage through Exploiting Complementary Assets via Interfirm Cooperation , 2022 .

[60]  R. V. Wyk.  Innovation: The attacker's advantage : Richard N. Foster 316 pages, £14.95 (London, Macmillan, 1986) , 1987 .

[61]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[62]  Michael Hobday,et al.  East Asian latecomer firms: Learning the technology of electronics , 1995 .

[63]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[64]  Jonathan D. Linton,et al.  Forecasting the market diffusion of disruptive and discontinuous innovation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[65]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Explaining the attacker's advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network , 1995 .

[66]  Michael E. Raynor,et al.  The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth , 2003 .

[67]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[68]  Peter Ping Li,et al.  Toward an integrated theory of multinational evolution: The evidence of Chinese multinational enterprises as latecomers , 2007 .

[69]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[70]  J. Magretta.  Why business models matter. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[71]  W. Kim,et al.  Value innovation: the strategic logic of high growth. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[72]  C. Markides.  Strategic Innovation in Established Companies , 1998 .

[73]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .