The Design Tensions Framework

ABSTRACT This article introduces the notion of design tensions as a paradigm. The concept of design tensions advances design decisions as a focus for analysis and reflection. It admits many paradigms of analysis but emphasizes the balancing of considerations in producing an entire system, emphasizing user or user group experience. This paradigm is presented in relationship to a particular design arena, the design of NetCalc, a system of handheld, wirelessly connected tools for math teaching/learning in classroom settings. Six intertwined project tensions are presented and explored for their technical, social, and cognitive antecedents and consequences, as they play out in relationship to achieving goals and system potential. Design tensions differ from design spaces in that they do not set boundaries or simplify the problem but rather provide a framework for creating a space of relevance.

[1]  M. Smith.  Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. , 1951 .

[2]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[3]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Design rationale: mutual opportunities for research and practice , 1994, CHI '94.

[4]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  Design rationale: the argument behind the artifact , 1989, CHI '89.

[5]  A. Strauss.  Work and the Division of Labor , 1985 .

[6]  A. N. Leont’ev.  The Problem of Activity in Psychology , 1974 .

[7]  Stephen Hegedus,et al.  The Effect of a SimCalc Connected Classroom on Students' Algebraic Thinking , 2005 .

[8]  Reed Stevens,et al.  Divisions of Labor in School and in the Workplace: Comparing Computer and Paper-Supported Activities Across Settings , 2000 .

[9]  L. Suchman.  Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[10]  Karen A. Cole.  Equity issues in computer-based collaboration: looking beyond surface indicators , 1995, CSCL.

[11]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[12]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[13]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Scandinavian Design: On Participation and Skill , 1992, Usability - Turning Technologies into Tools.

[14]  Christopher Alexander,et al.  The Timeless Way of Building , 1979 .

[15]  Phil Vahey,et al.  Leveraging Handhelds to Increase Student Learning: Engaging Middle School Students with the Mathematics of Change , 2004, ICLS.

[16]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. , 1996 .

[17]  Jock D. Mackinlay,et al.  A morphological analysis of the design space of input devices , 1991, TOIS.

[18]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Value-sensitive design , 1996, INTR.

[19]  Batya Friedman,et al.  New directions: a value-sensitive design approach to augmented reality , 2000, DARE '00.

[20]  J. Roschelle.  Learning by Collaborating: Convergent Conceptual Change , 1992 .

[21]  S. Bly,et al.  Commune: a shared drawing surface , 1990, COCS '90.

[22]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[23]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction (4th Edition) , 2004 .

[24]  E. Matchett,et al.  Practical Design Based on Method (Fundamental Design Method) , 1966 .

[25]  Uri Wilensky,et al.  Networked Gridlock: Students Enacting Complex Dynamic Phenomena with the HubNet Architecture , 2000 .

[26]  I. McMillan,et al.  Changing Minds , 2000 .

[27]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Usability Engineering: Scenario-based Development of Human-Computer Interaction , 2001 .

[28]  Stephen Houlgate,et al.  The Hegel Reader , 1998 .

[29]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[30]  Janet Bowers,et al.  Linking Algebraic Concepts and Contexts: Every Picture Tells a Story , 2000 .

[31]  S. M. Hansen.  Where the action is. , 1985, Journal (National Association for Hospital Development (U.S.)).

[32]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[33]  K. Lewin,et al.  Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers , 1951 .

[34]  S. Vereza.  Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 2001 .

[35]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[36]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Design for Conversation: Lessons from Cognoter , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[37]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Referring as a Collaborative Process , 2003 .

[38]  Christine Reid,et al.  The Myth of the Paperless Office , 2003, J. Documentation.

[39]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[40]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Creating Conditions for Participation: Conflicts and Resources in Systems Development , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[41]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in Society , 2005 .

[42]  John C. Tang,et al.  Videodraw: a video interface for collaborative drawing , 1991, TOIS.

[43]  B. Lomov.  The Problem of Activity in Psychology , 1982 .

[44]  L. Larsson.  Turtle geometry , 2006 .

[45]  W. Sandoval,et al.  Design-Based Research Methods for Studying Learning in Context: Introduction , 2004 .

[46]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[47]  Kibum Kim,et al.  Weak guidance with "Look" functionality in handheld-based classroom activities , 2005, CSCL.

[48]  湯淺 太一,et al.  20世紀の名著名論:Seymour Papert: Mindstorms:Children Computers and Powerful Ideas Basic Books New York 1980 , 2005 .

[49]  Barton C. Massey,et al.  DESIGN METHODS , 2002 .

[50]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding q , 2003 .

[51]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy , 2000 .

[52]  H. Rittel,et al.  On the Planning Crisis : Systems Analysis of the 'First an d Second Generations ' , 2006 .

[53]  Jeremy Roschelle,et al.  Theorizing the Transformed Classroom: Sociocultural Interpretation of the Effects of Audience Response Systems in Higher Education , 2006 .

[54]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  Repair Theory: A Generative Theory of Bugs in Procedural Skills , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[55]  Harold Abelson,et al.  Turtle geometry : the computer as a medium for exploring mathematics , 1983 .

[56]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  WYSIWIS revised: early experiences with multiuser interfaces , 1987, TOIS.

[57]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[58]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding , 2004 .

[59]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Human-computer interaction (2nd ed.) , 1998 .

[60]  Michel Beaudouin-Lafon,et al.  Designing interaction, not interfaces , 2004, AVI.