The relevance of attention for selecting news content. An eye-tracking study on attention patterns in the reception of print and online media

Abstract This article argues that a theory of media selectivity needs a theory of attention, because attention to a media stimulus is the starting point of each process of reception. Attention sequences towards media stimuli – pages of newspapers and online-newspapers – were analyzed using eye-tracking patterns from three different perspectives. First, attention patterns were compared under varying task conditions. Second, different types of media were tested. Third, attention sequences towards different forms of news with different design patterns were compared. Attention was seen as a prerequisite for reception: Its selective functions for these processes are especially important. Reception itself was examined within an action-theoretical framework and therefore described as a form of interaction between recipient and the media. Eye-tracking data were used as indicators of attention. Starting with a hypothesis on the impact of different media such as printed newspapers and online newspapers on the agenda-setting process of their audience, the study examined how the type of media and the form of news influences attention and selectivity. Our findings showed that visual cues such as salient photos or graphics and information hierarchies signalled by design and layout guide attention processes, not as an automatic process driven from the bottom up, but as stimuli for an active, intention-driven selection process. The results indicate that the form of news affects these patterns of interactive attention more than the medium itself.

[1]  Sally J. McMillan,et al.  Defining Interactivity , 2000, New Media Soc..

[2]  Jens Riegelsberger,et al.  Could I have the Menu Please? An Eye Tracking Study of Design Conventions , 2004 .

[3]  K. Rayner.  Eye Movements and Cognitive Processes in Reading, Visual Search, and Scene Perception , 1995 .

[4]  Christian Balkenius,et al.  Behavioural Strategies in Web Interaction: A View from Eye-movement Research , 2003 .

[5]  Sally J. McMillan.  Exploring Models of Interactivity from Multiple Research Traditions: Users, Documents, and Systems , 2002 .

[6]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  The importance of a software's pragmatic quality depends on usage modes , 2002 .

[7]  L. Stark,et al.  Scanpaths in saccadic eye movements while viewing and recognizing patterns. , 1971, Vision research.

[8]  Robert W. Kentridge,et al.  Eye movement research : mechanisms, processes and applications , 1995 .

[9]  Gabi Schaap,et al.  Action theory and communication research: Recent developments in Europe , 2004 .

[10]  K. Schönbach,et al.  Online and Print Newspapers: Their Impact on the Extent of the Perceived Public Agenda , 2005 .

[11]  Scott L. Althaus,et al.  Differences in Knowledge Acquisition among Readers of the Paper and Online Versions of a National Newspaper , 2000 .

[12]  F. Wester,et al.  The ‘Media Use as Social Action’ Approach: Theory, Methodology, and Research Evidence So Far , 2001 .

[13]  D. F. Fisher,et al.  Eye movements : cognition and visual perception , 1982 .

[14]  Rico Fischer,et al.  Eye tracking and its application in usability and media research , 2003, MMI Interakt..

[15]  Andrew T. Duchowski,et al.  Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice , 2003, Springer London.

[16]  J Theeuwes,et al.  Visual selective attention: a theoretical analysis. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[17]  Kai-Christoph Hamborg,et al.  Visuelles Orientierungsverhalten auf Webseiten (Visual Orientation Behavior on Web Pages) , 2005, i-com.

[18]  O. Neumann,et al.  Theorien der Aufmerksamkeit : von Metaphern zu Mechanismen , 1992 .

[19]  Spiro Kiousis,et al.  Interactivity: a concept explication , 2002, New Media Soc..

[20]  Wolfgang Becker,et al.  Models of Oculomotor Function: an Appraisal of the Engineer’s Intrusion into Oculomotor Physiology , 1995 .

[21]  Kenneth Holmqvist,et al.  The role of local design factors for newspaper reading behaviour – an eye-tracking perspective , 2005 .

[22]  K. Holmqvist,et al.  Entry points and reading paths on newspaper spreads: comparing a semiotic analysis with eye-tracking measurements , 2006 .

[23]  Jan Panero Benway,et al.  Banner Blindness: The Irony of Attention Grabbing on the World Wide Web , 1998 .

[24]  O. Mimura.  [Eye movements]. , 1992, Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi.

[25]  Fay Sudweeks,et al.  Networked Interactivity , 1997, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[26]  Kenneth Holmqvist,et al.  Daily newspaper layout - designers' predictions of readers' visual behaviour - a case study , 2005 .

[27]  David R. Spencer,et al.  The Form of News: A History , 2001 .

[28]  L. Stark,et al.  Scanpaths in Eye Movements during Pattern Perception , 1971, Science.

[29]  D. Coppola,et al.  Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic eye movements when viewing different visual environments , 1999, Vision Research.

[30]  A. L. Yarbus,et al.  Eye Movements and Vision , 1967, Springer US.

[31]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[32]  J. Henderson,et al.  High-level scene perception. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[33]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[34]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Examining Information Processing on the World Wide Web Using Think Aloud Protocols , 2000 .

[35]  Keith S. Karn,et al.  Commentary on Section 4. Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises. , 2003 .

[36]  Boris M. Velichkovsky,et al.  Die Bewegungen des menschlichen Auges: Fakten, Methoden, innovative Anwendungen , 2003 .

[37]  Jana Holsanova,et al.  Reading or scanning? A study of newspaper and net paper reading. , 2003 .

[38]  David Tewksbury.  What Do Americans Really Want to Know? Tracking the Behavior of News Readers on the Internet , 2003 .

[39]  A. L. I︠A︡rbus.  Eye Movements and Vision , 1967 .

[40]  Klaus Schoenbach,et al.  Research Note: Online and Print Newspapers , 2005 .