On Technology as Material in Design

And what is the purpose of writing music? One is, of course, not dealing with purposes but dealing with sounds. John Cage Silence In many ways, design has been moving away from the physical object. Emerging practices such as interaction, experience and service design, often utilising new technologies with almost 'immaterial' properties, seem to point to a situation where the material 'thing' as we used to know it is replaced by communication, information, systems and infrastructures. From another perspective, however, the importance of the things themselves is being re-discovered, and perhaps these new 'immaterial' technologies play a role in this. A central reason for this shift is that though technical objects are often characterised by their practical functionality, their everyday lives seem a bit more complicated than these official functions might suggest. Thus, the predominant focus on practical functionality in the design of technical objects need to reconsidered and above all complemented. As we turn to these things, we do not only have to re-locate the functions of technical objects within a rich context of use; to understand the presence of technical objects, we also need to consider the materials that build them. In what follows, I will present some ideas on how the properties of technologies (such as information technology) seem to influence the way we think about the design of technical objects. Further, I will try to challenge the instrumental perspective on technology by considering it to be design material, asking question about it such as: what are its expressions as material? What are its form elements?

[1]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Ambient Displays: Turning Architectural Space into an Interface between People and Digital Information , 1998, CoBuild.

[2]  Thomas Binder Intent, Form, and Materiality in the Design of Interaction Technology , 2002, Social Thinking - Software Practice.

[3]  Kristina Niedderer,et al.  Designing the Performative Object: a study in designing mindful interaction through artefacts , 2004 .

[4]  Peter P.C.C. Verbeek,et al.  The things that matter , 1998 .

[5]  David Fleming,et al.  Design Talk: Constructing the Object in Studio Conversations , 1998 .

[6]  Johan Redström,et al.  Textile displays: using textiles to investigate computational technology as design material , 2002, NordiCHI '02.

[7]  Ken Friedman,et al.  Theory construction in design research: criteria: approaches, and methods , 2003 .

[8]  Anne Galloway,et al.  Design for hackability , 2004, DIS '04.

[9]  A. Moles,et al.  Design and Immateriality: What of It in a Post Industrial Society? , 1988 .

[10]  Cameron Tonkinwise Is Design Finished?: Dematerialisation and Changing Things , 2004 .

[11]  Andrew Blauvelt,et al.  Strangely familiar : design and everyday life , 2003 .

[12]  Johan Redström,et al.  From use to presence: on the expressions and aesthetics of everyday computational things , 2002, TCHI.

[13]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design , 1999 .

[14]  Tony Fry Rematerialisation as a Prospective Project , 2005 .

[15]  Jan Michl,et al.  On Seeing Design as Redesign: An Exploration of a Neglected Problem in Design Education , 2002 .

[16]  David B. Wilson,et al.  Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry by Albert Borgmann (review) , 1986 .

[17]  Peter Kroes,et al.  Technical Functions as Dispositions: a Critical Assessment , 2001 .

[18]  Junji Takabayashi,et al.  Effects of Light on the Tritrophic Interaction Between Kidney Bean Plants, Two-Spotted Spider Mites and Predatory Mites, Amblyseius Womersleyi (Acari: Phytoseiidae) , 2004, Experimental & Applied Acarology.