Smart energy: where do we stand and where should we go?

Although public concern about environmental issues has been growing, the global efforts towards greater environmental sustainability have not been able to stabilize—let alone decrease—the level of GHGs in the atmosphere (IPCC 2013). Still worse, in 2013 the level of carbon dioxide (the main GHG produced by burning fossil fuels such as coal and oil) in the atmosphere surged at its fastest rate in 30 years (IPCC 2013). Annually, about 50 billion tons of additional carbon dioxide are emitted (The Economist 2014). There is a consensus among academics that, by 2100, in order to avoid “dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system” (UNFCCC 1992), the global mean temperature must not increase more than two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. To stabilize carbon dioxide concentration at this level, emissions must be reduced by around 40 to 70 % (compared to 2010) by 2050 and close to zero by 2100 (IPCC 2014a). Currently, however, it appears extremely unlikely that the global community will succeed in effectively curbing GHG emissions fast enough to achieve the two degrees Celsius goal. Our economies are still heavily dependent on fossil fuels, and as long as increasing economic prosperity goes along with increasing levels of GHG emissions (von Weizsacker, Hargroves, Smith, Desha, and Stasinopoulos 2009, pp. 17), these emissions will almost certainly not decline as much as needed. To break this vicious cycle, we have to identify ways to increase carbon productivity (using energy more efficiently while sustaining economic growth), consume less energy (eco-effectivity and eco-sufficiency), and decrease our dependency on fossil fuels by using renewable energy sources (Hoffert et al. 2002; McKinsey Global Institute 2008; von Weizsacker et al. 2009). Correspondingly, Sarkis, Koo, and Watson (2013) emphasize the need to find a synergistic win–win relationship between economic growth and green growth. The largest proportion (49 %) of GHG emissions are caused by the energy supply sector (IPCC 2014b). Due to a higher energy demand and a larger share of coal in the global fuel mix, GHG emissions associated with the energy supply sector increased more rapidly between 2000 and 2010 than in the three previous decades (IPCC 2014a). Seventy percent of the energy supply sector’s GHG emissions are caused by electricity and heat generation, the largest polluter of which is in the electricity sector. Therefore, many countries have been striving to make their electricity systems more renewablesbased and “intelligent.” Intelligent (or smart) systems often involve the deployment of information and communication technologies (ICTs) to allow for electricity systems to be used as efficiently as possible. J. Kranz (*) Chair of Management Information Systems and Methods, University of Gottingen, Platz der Gottinger Sieben 5, 37073 Gottingen, Germany e-mail: jkranz@uni-goettingen.de

[1]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  The U-Constructs: Four Information Drives , 2006, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Arnold Picot,et al.  Why are consumers going green? the role of environmental concerns in private green-IS adoption , 2011, ECIS.

[3]  Xinyue Ye,et al.  A group-based spatial decision support system for wind farm site selection in Northwest Ohio , 2013 .

[4]  Janis Kossahl,et al.  Smart Metering Information Management , 2011, Wirtsch..

[5]  Nigel Melville,et al.  Information Systems Innovation for Environmental Sustainability , 2010, MIS Q..

[6]  Lorenz Erdmann,et al.  Expected Environmental Impacts of Pervasive Computing , 2004 .

[7]  M. Ha-Duong,et al.  Climate change 2014 - Mitigation of climate change , 2015 .

[8]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[9]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Stability: Energy for a Greenhouse Planet Advanced Technology Paths to Global Climate , 2008 .

[10]  B. Latour,et al.  Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? , 1986 .

[11]  Christoph Flath,et al.  Cluster Analysis of Smart Metering Data , 2012, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[12]  Edmundo Tovar Caro,et al.  The IT Crowd: Are We Stereotypes? , 2008, IT Professional.

[13]  Peter Loos,et al.  Towards a Reference Model for ecological IT Service Management , 2013, ICIS.

[14]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[15]  Lutz M. Kolbe,et al.  Assessing the potential of different charging strategies for electric vehicle fleets in closed transport systems , 2014 .

[16]  Johann Kranz,et al.  Toward an End-to-End Smart Grid: Overcoming Bottlenecks to Facilitate Competition and Innovation in Smart Grids , 2011 .

[17]  Michael H. Breitner,et al.  Decision Analytics with Heatmap Visualization for Multi-step Ensemble Data , 2014, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[18]  M. Callon Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[19]  Viet T. Dao,et al.  From green to sustainability: Information Technology and an integrated sustainability framework , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Leyland F. Pitt,et al.  Integrating the smartphone into a sound environmental information systems strategy: Principles, practices and a research agenda , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Rüdiger Zarnekow,et al.  Towards a Typology of Green IS Strategies: Insights from Case Study Research , 2012, ICIS.

[22]  R. Watson,et al.  U-commerce: Expanding the universe of marketing , 2002 .

[23]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[24]  Chulmo Koo,et al.  Examining the eco-technological knowledge of Smart Green IT adoption behavior: A self-determination perspective , 2014 .

[25]  Chulmo Koo,et al.  Green practices-IS alignment and environmental performance: The mediating effects of coordination , 2013, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[26]  Rüdiger Zarnekow,et al.  Kennzahlenbasierte Erfolgsmessung von Green IT-Maßnahmen - Eine empirische Analyse zum aktuellen Stand in Forschung und Praxis , 2013, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[27]  Steve Elliot,et al.  Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Environmental Sustainability: A Resource Base and Framework for IT-Enabled Business Transformation , 2011, MIS Q..

[28]  C. Davis,et al.  Harnessing Green IT: Principles and Practices , 2012 .

[29]  Vanessa A. Cooper,et al.  Green Information Systems (Green IS) Practice in Organisation: Tracing its Emergence and Recurrent Use , 2012, AMCIS.

[30]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  ICIS 2010 Panel Report: Technologies that Transform Business and Research: Lessons from the Past as We Look to the Future , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Rüdiger Zarnekow,et al.  Examining the contribution of Green IT to the objectives of IT departments: Empirical Evidence from German Enterprises , 2011, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  Environmental Sustainability in Design Science Research: Direct and Indirect Effects of Design Artifacts , 2012, DESRIST.

[33]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Mis problems and failures: a socio-technical perspective , 1977 .

[34]  David R. Firth,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 2011 .

[35]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[36]  Tom Butler,et al.  Compliance with institutional imperatives on environmental sustainability: Building theory on the role of Green IS , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Matthias Schumann,et al.  Leveraging Green IS in Logistics , 2013, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[38]  Jan Recker,et al.  Sensemaking and Sustainable Practicing: Functional Affordances of Information Systems in Green Transformations , 2013, MIS Q..

[39]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies , 1992 .

[40]  K. Lai,et al.  An Organizational Theoretic Review of Green Supply Chain Management Literature , 2011 .

[41]  S. Alam,et al.  Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1993 .

[42]  M. Callon Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[43]  Maurizio Catulli,et al.  Information and Communication Technology‐Enabled Low Carbon Technologies , 2012 .

[44]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Information Systems and Environmentally Sustainable Development: Energy Informatics and New Directions for the IS Community , 2010, MIS Q..

[45]  Nigel P. Melville,et al.  Spurring impactful research on information systems for environmental sustainability , 2013 .

[46]  Stefan Feuerriegel,et al.  Shaping a Sustainable Society: How Information Systems Utilize Hidden Synergies between Green Technologies , 2013, ICIS.

[47]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Telematics at UPS: En Route to Energy Informatics , 2010, MIS Q. Executive.

[48]  John Law,et al.  Shaping technology building society: studies in socio-technical change , 1993 .

[49]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  An Institutional Perspective on the Adoption of Green IS & IT , 2011, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Chulmo Koo,et al.  How does ecological responsibility affect manufacturing firms' environmental and economic performance? , 2014 .

[51]  Yehia M. El-Sayed Factor five: Transforming the global economy through 80% improvement in resource productivity , 2010 .

[52]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[53]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Editors' Comments - Special Issue on Enterprise and Industry Applications of Social Media , 2010, MIS Q. Executive.

[54]  Frédéric Thiesse,et al.  Motivating Energy-Efficient Behavior with Green IS: An Investigation of Goal Setting and the Role of Defaults , 2013, MIS Q..

[55]  Daniel J. Veit,et al.  The Impact of Endogenous Motivations on Adoption of IT-Enabled Services , 2013 .

[56]  Lutz Kolbe,et al.  Understanding the Role of Culture in Eco-Innovation Adoption - An Empirical Cross-Country Comparison , 2013, ICIS.

[57]  Kent Marett,et al.  Assessing the Effects of Benefits and Institutional Influences on the Continued Use of Environmentally Munificent Bypass Systems in Long-Haul Trucking , 2013, MIS Q..

[58]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate Change 2013 - The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2014 .

[59]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Green projects: An information drives analysis of four cases , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Jason L. Dedrick,et al.  Green IS: Concepts and Issues for Information Systems Research , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[61]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis and Poole's Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[62]  Frank Teuteberg,et al.  Towards A Conceptual Framework For Life Cycle Assessment In Sustainable Information Systems Management , 2013, ECIS.

[63]  Vanessa A. Cooper,et al.  Antecedents to Greening Data Centres: A Conceptual Framework and Exploratory Case Study , 2010, ACIS.

[64]  Alemayehu Molla The Extent of Green IT Adoption and its Driving and Inhibiting factors: An Exploratory Study , 2009 .

[65]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Green information systems & technologies – this generation and beyond: Introduction to the special issue , 2013, Information Systems Frontiers.

[66]  Acklesh Prasad,et al.  Antecedents of Sustainable Management Support for IT-Related Initiatives , 2012, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[67]  S. Chatterjee,et al.  Design Science Research in Information Systems , 2010 .

[68]  E. A. Locke,et al.  New Directions in Goal-Setting Theory , 2006 .

[69]  Karlson Hargroves,et al.  Factor Five: Transforming the Global Economy through 80% Improvements in Resource Productivity , 2009 .

[70]  Johann Kranz,et al.  The role of smart metering and decentralized electricity storage for smart grids: The importance of positive externalities , 2012 .

[71]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Climate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change , 2014 .

[72]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  POSITIONING AND PRESENTING DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR MAXIMUM IMPACT 1 , 2013 .

[73]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  The relevance of information and communication technologies for environmental sustainability - A prospective simulation study , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[74]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Information technology as a change actant in sustainability innovation: Insights from Uppsala , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..