Human Striatal Response to Salient Nonrewarding Stimuli

Although one proposed function of both the striatum and its major dopamine inputs is related to coding rewards and reward-related stimuli, an alternative view suggests a more general role of the striatum in processing salient events, regardless of their reward value. Here we define saliency as an event that both is unexpected and elicits an attentional-behavioral switch (i.e., arousing). In the present study, human striatal responses to nonrewarding salient stimuli were investigated. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the blood oxygenation level-dependent signal was measured in response to flickering visual distractors presented in the background of an ongoing task. Distractor salience was manipulated by altering the frequency of distractor occurrence. Infrequently presented distractors were considered more salient than frequently presented distractors. We also investigated whether behavioral relevance of the distractors was a necessary component of saliency for eliciting striatal responses. In the first experiment (19 subjects), the distractors were made behaviorally relevant by defining a subset of them as targets requiring a button press. In the second experiment (17 subjects), the distractors were not behaviorally relevant (i.e., they did not require any response). The fMRI results revealed increased activation in the nucleus accumbens after infrequent (high salience) relative to frequent (low salience) presentation of distractors in both experiments. Caudate activity increased only when the distractors were behaviorally relevant. These results demonstrate a role of the striatum in coding nonrewarding salient events. In addition, a functional subdivision of the striatum according to the behavioral relevance of the stimuli is suggested.

[1]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Responses of striatal neurons in the behaving monkey. 1. Head of the caudate nucleus , 1983, Behavioural Brain Research.

[2]  Elsevier Biomedical Press RESPONSES OF STRIATAL NEURONS IN THE BEHAVING MONKEY. 1. HEAD OF THE CAUDATE NUCLEUS , 1983 .

[3]  E. T. Rolls,et al.  Responses of striatal neurons in the behaving monkey. 2. Visual processing in the caudal neostriatum , 1984, Brain Research.

[4]  O Hikosaka,et al.  Functional properties of monkey caudate neurons. II. Visual and auditory responses. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[6]  G. E. Alexander,et al.  Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processing , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  Edmund T. Rolls,et al.  Neuronal responses in the ventral striatum of the behaving macaque , 1993, Behavioural Brain Research.

[8]  James C. Houk,et al.  Elements of the Intrinsic Organization and Information Processing in the Neostriatum , 1994 .

[9]  A. Graybiel,et al.  Responses of tonically active neurons in the primate's striatum undergo systematic changes during behavioral sensorimotor conditioning , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[11]  R. Turner,et al.  Characterizing Dynamic Brain Responses with fMRI: A Multivariate Approach , 1995, NeuroImage.

[12]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[14]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Infrequent events transiently activate human prefrontal and parietal cortex as measured by functional MRI. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[16]  P. Redgrave,et al.  Is the short-latency dopamine response too short to signal reward error? , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How Many Subjects Constitute a Study? , 1999, NeuroImage.

[18]  Sabrina Ravel,et al.  Tonically active neurons in the monkey striatum do not preferentially respond to appetitive stimuli , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Prefrontal Activation Evoked by Infrequent Target and Novel Stimuli in a Visual Target Detection Task: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  J L Lancaster,et al.  Automated Talairach Atlas labels for functional brain mapping , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[21]  R. Benson,et al.  Responses to rare visual target and distractor stimuli using event-related fMRI. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Brian Knutson,et al.  FMRI Visualization of Brain Activity during a Monetary Incentive Delay Task , 2000, NeuroImage.

[23]  J. Hollerman,et al.  Reward processing in primate orbitofrontal cortex and basal ganglia. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  R. Malenka,et al.  Dopaminergic modulation of neuronal excitability in the striatum and nucleus accumbens. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  J. Horvitz Mesolimbocortical and nigrostriatal dopamine responses to salient non-reward events , 2000, Neuroscience.

[26]  L. Nystrom,et al.  Tracking the hemodynamic responses to reward and punishment in the striatum. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Samuel M. McClure,et al.  Predictability Modulates Human Brain Response to Reward , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Functional Imaging of Neural Responses to Expectancy and Experience of Monetary Gains and Losses tasks with monetary payoffs , 2001 .

[29]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Role of Tonically Active Neurons in Primate Caudate in Reward-Oriented Saccadic Eye Movement , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[31]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Dissociation of reward anticipation and outcome with event-related fMRI , 2001, Neuroreport.

[32]  H. Breiter,et al.  Reward Circuitry Activation by Noxious Thermal Stimuli , 2001, Neuron.

[33]  T. Braver,et al.  Sensitivity of prefrontal cortex to changes in target probability: A functional MRI study , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[34]  B. Picconi,et al.  Role of tonically-active neurons in the control of striatal function: Cellular mechanisms and behavioral correlates , 2001, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[35]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Anticipation of Increasing Monetary Reward Selectively Recruits Nucleus Accumbens , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  P. Montague,et al.  Activity in human ventral striatum locked to errors of reward prediction , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  J. Downar,et al.  A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  J. Horvitz Dopamine gating of glutamatergic sensorimotor and incentive motivational input signals to the striatum , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[39]  Brian Knutson,et al.  A region of mesial prefrontal cortex tracks monetarily rewarding outcomes: characterization with rapid event-related fMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[40]  R. Elliott,et al.  Differential Response Patterns in the Striatum and Orbitofrontal Cortex to Financial Reward in Humans: A Parametric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  G. Schoenbaum,et al.  Neural Encoding in Ventral Striatum during Olfactory Discrimination Learning , 2003, Neuron.