Advanced computational tools for PEM fuel cell design: Part 2. Detailed experimental validation and parametric study

This paper reports on the systematic experimental validation of a comprehensive 3D CFD-based computational model presented and documented in Part 1. Simulations for unit cells with straight channels, similar to the Ballard Mk902 hardware, are performed and analyzed in conjunction with detailed current mapping measurements and water mass distributions in the membrane-electrode assembly. The experiments were designed to display sensitivity of the cell over a range of operating parameters including current density, humidification, and coolant temperature, making the data particularly well suited for systematic validation. Based on the validation and analysis of the predictions, values of model parameters, including the electro-osmotic drag coefficient, capillary diffusion coefficient, and catalyst specific surface area are determined adjusted to fit experimental data of current density and MEA water content. The predicted net water flux out of the anode (normalized by the total water generated) increases as anode humidification water flow rate is increased, in agreement with experimental results. A modification of the constitutive equation for the capillary diffusivity of water in the porous electrodes that attempts to incorporate the experimentally observed immobile (or irreducible) saturation yields a better fit of the predicted MEA water mass with experimental data. The specific surface area parameter used in the catalyst layer model is found to be effective in tuning the simulations to predict the correct cell voltage over a range of stoichiometries.

[1]  Ned Djilali,et al.  CFD-based modelling of proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2005 .

[2]  N. Djilali,et al.  Determination of transport parameters for multiphase flow in porous gas diffusion electrodes using a capillary network model , 2007 .

[3]  Jing Cao,et al.  Modeling PEMFC With FLUENT: Numerical Performance and Validations With Experimental Data , 2005 .

[4]  Xianguo Li,et al.  Mathematical modeling of proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2001 .

[5]  A. A. Kulikovsky,et al.  Quasi-3D Modeling of Water Transport in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells , 2003 .

[6]  Shaoping Li,et al.  A Three Dimensional CFD Model for PEMFC , 2004 .

[7]  Chao-Yang Wang,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells , 2000 .

[8]  J. Stumper,et al.  In Situ Determination of MEA Resistance and Electrode Diffusivity of a Fuel Cell , 2005 .

[9]  Sadik Kakac,et al.  Two‐dimensional model for proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 1998 .

[10]  Chaoyang Wang,et al.  Prediction of Dry-Wet-Dry Transition in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells , 2007 .

[11]  T. Springer,et al.  Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Model , 1991 .

[12]  Mark W. Verbrugge,et al.  A Mathematical Model of the Solid‐Polymer‐Electrolyte Fuel Cell , 1992 .

[13]  A. A. Kulikovsky,et al.  1D + 1D model of a DMFC: localized solutions and mixedpotential , 2004 .

[14]  Ned Djilali,et al.  Advanced computational tools for PEM fuel cell design: Part 1. Development and base case simulations , 2008 .

[15]  Nathan P. Siegel,et al.  Single domain PEMFC model based on agglomerate catalyst geometry , 2003 .

[16]  Felix N. Büchi,et al.  Operating Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Without External Humidification of the Reactant Gases Fundamental Aspects , 1997 .

[17]  K. Sharp,et al.  Validated Leverett Approach for Multiphase Flow in PEFC Diffusion Media I. Hydrophobicity Effect , 2007 .

[18]  James J. McGuirk,et al.  2D and 3D Modeling of a PEMFC Cathode with Interdigitated Gas Distributors , 2005 .

[19]  Mark Pritzker,et al.  Capillary pressure and hydrophilic porosity in gas diffusion layers for polymer electrolyte fuel cells , 2006 .

[20]  T. Nguyen,et al.  An Along‐the‐Channel Model for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells , 1998 .

[21]  Norman Munroe,et al.  Review and comparison of approaches to proton exchange membrane fuel cell modeling , 2005 .

[22]  Ned Djilali,et al.  Computational modelling of polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cells: Challenges and opportunities , 2007 .

[23]  Sandip Mazumder,et al.  Rigorous 3-D mathematical modeling of PEM fuel cells. II. Model predictions with liquid water transport , 2003 .

[24]  Hongtan Liu,et al.  A two-phase flow and transport model for the cathode of PEM fuel cells , 2002 .

[25]  T. Springer,et al.  A Comparative Study of Water Uptake By and Transport Through Ionomeric Fuel Cell Membranes , 1993 .

[26]  Hyunchul Ju,et al.  Experimental Validation of a PEM Fuel Cell Model by Current Distribution Data , 2004 .

[27]  Sirivatch Shimpalee,et al.  Verifying Predictions of Water and Current Distributions in a Serpentine Flow Field Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell , 2003 .

[28]  A. A. Kulikovsky,et al.  Modeling the Cathode Compartment of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells: Dead and Active Reaction Zones , 1999 .

[29]  B. Wetton,et al.  Water Management in PEM Fuel Cells , 2004 .

[30]  Hongtan Liu,et al.  A 3D model for PEM fuel cells operated on reformate , 2004 .

[31]  S. Dutta,et al.  Numerical prediction of mass-exchange between cathode and anode channels in a PEM fuel cell , 2001 .

[32]  A. Weber,et al.  Modeling transport in polymer-electrolyte fuel cells. , 2004, Chemical reviews.

[33]  Ned Djilali,et al.  A 3D, Multiphase, Multicomponent Model of the Cathode and Anode of a PEM Fuel Cell , 2003 .