Comprehensive Pricing Scheme of the EV Charging Station considering Consumer Differences Based on Integrated AHP/DEA Methodology

Scientific pricing of the electric vehicle charging station is closely related to consumer behavior inevitably. Existing studies have not considered the impacts of consumer differences on the charging price, which will fail to meet the interests of various types of consumers. This paper proposes a novel pricing method based on consumer classification and comprehensive evaluation strategies. First, the basis for consumer classification is established according to a single factor sensitivity analysis of the consumer benefit model; then, the nonlinear expression of the basis is piecewise linearized. Additionally, with the principle of least fitting error to determine consumers’ classification, the initial charging price schemes for various types of consumers are formulated. Second, this paper defines evaluation indices and establishes the hierarchy model for comprehensive evaluation schemes. Finally, the integrated analytic hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis are adopted for comprehensive evaluation of schemes. Simulations results illustrate that the proposed method can formulate the comprehensive optimal charging price considering consumer differences, and the method can reflect the impacts of both subjective and objective factors conveniently and accurately.

[1]  Jui-Che Tu,et al.  Key Factors Influencing Consumers’ Purchase of Electric Vehicles , 2019, Sustainability.

[2]  Elias B. Kosmatopoulos,et al.  An Adaptive Learning-Based Approach for Nearly Optimal Dynamic Charging of Electric Vehicle Fleets , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Ruoyu Liang,et al.  What influences sales market of new energy vehicles in China? Empirical study based on survey of consumers’ purchase reasons , 2020 .

[4]  Yongmin Zhang,et al.  Optimal Charging Scheduling by Pricing for EV Charging Station With Dual Charging Modes , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[5]  Cungang Hu,et al.  A distributed charging strategy based on day ahead price model for PV-powered electric vehicle charging station , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[6]  B. Sovacool,et al.  Understanding the socio-technical nexus of Nordic electric vehicle (EV) barriers: A qualitative discussion of range, price, charging and knowledge , 2020, Energy Policy.

[7]  Jin-Hua Xu,et al.  Analysing online behaviour to determine Chinese consumers’ preferences for electric vehicles , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[8]  Nikolce Murgovski,et al.  Effect of driving, charging, and pricing scenarios on optimal component sizing of a PHEV , 2017 .

[9]  Li Zhang,et al.  Analysis of New Energy Vehicles Industry Policy in China's Cities from the Perspective of Policy instruments☆ , 2016 .

[10]  Yue Li,et al.  Intelligent Parking Garage EV Charging Scheduling Considering Battery Charging Characteristic , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[11]  Yi Song,et al.  A Charging Strategy with the Price Stimulus Considering the Queue of Charging Station and EV Fast Charging Demand , 2018, Energy Procedia.

[12]  Xuefang Li,et al.  Ownership and Usage Analysis of Alternative Fuel Vehicles in the United States with the 2017 National Household Travel Survey Data , 2019, Sustainability.

[13]  Ming Yang,et al.  Optimal coordinated operation scheduling for electric vehicle aggregator and charging stations in an integrated electricity-transportation system , 2020 .

[14]  Inmaculada Zamora,et al.  Methodology for assessing electric vehicle charging infrastructure business models , 2016 .

[15]  F. Sprei,et al.  A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure , 2018, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[16]  Weihua Gui,et al.  A Projective and Discriminative Dictionary Learning for High-Dimensional Process Monitoring With Industrial Applications , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[17]  Thomas P. Lyon,et al.  Is “smart charging” policy for electric vehicles worthwhile? , 2012 .

[18]  Jan J. Cilliers,et al.  An integrated constrained fuzzy stochastic analytic hierarchy process method with application to the choice problem , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  B. Sovacool,et al.  The market case for electric mobility: Investigating electric vehicle business models for mass adoption , 2020, Energy.

[20]  Qian Zhang,et al.  Dynamic Time-Of-Use Pricing Strategy for Electric Vehicle Charging Considering User Satisfaction Degree , 2020 .

[21]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Public investment and electric vehicle design: a model-based market analysis framework with application to a USA–China comparison study , 2016, Design Science.

[22]  Ning Wang,et al.  Cost–benefit assessment and implications for service pricing of electric taxies in China , 2015 .

[23]  Dragan Maksimovic,et al.  A field study of human factors and vehicle performance associated with PHEV adaptation , 2016 .

[24]  L. González,et al.  Impact of EV fast charging stations on the power distribution network of a Latin American intermediate city , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[25]  Zhao Yang Dong,et al.  Per-use-share rental strategy of distributed BESS in joint energy and frequency control ancillary services markets , 2020 .

[26]  Xiaojuan Han,et al.  Ordered charge control considering the uncertainty of charging load of electric vehicles based on Markov chain , 2020 .