Statistical distributions of earthquake numbers: consequence of branching process

We discuss various statistical distributions of earthquake numbers. Previously we derived several discrete distributions to describe earthquake numbers for the branching model of earthquake occurrence: these distributions are the Poisson, geometric, logarithmic, and the negative binomial (NBD). The theoretical model is the `birth and immigration' population process. The first three distributions above can be considered special cases of the NBD. In particular, a point branching process along the magnitude (or log seismic moment) axis with independent events (immigrants) explains the magnitude/moment-frequency relation and the NBD of earthquake counts in large time/space windows, as well as the dependence of the NBD parameters on the magnitude threshold (magnitude of an earthquake catalogue completeness). We discuss applying these distributions, especially the NBD, to approximate event numbers in earthquake catalogues. There are many different representations of the NBD. Most can be traced either to the Pascal distribution or to the mixture of the Poisson distribution with the gamma law. We discuss advantages and drawbacks of both representations for statistical analysis of earthquake catalogues. We also consider applying the NBD to earthquake forecasts and describe the limits of the application for the given equations. In contrast to the one-parameter Poisson distribution so widely used to describe earthquake occurrence, the NBD has two parameters. The second parameter can be used to characterize clustering or over-dispersion of a process. We determine the parameter values and their uncertainties for several local and global catalogues, and their subdivisions in various time intervals, magnitude thresholds, spatial windows, and tectonic categories. The theoretical model of how the clustering parameter depends on the corner (maximum) magnitude can be used to predict future earthquake number distribution in regions where very large earthquakes have not yet occurred.

[1]  Joseph Lipka,et al.  A Table of Integrals , 2010 .

[2]  Danijel Schorlemmer,et al.  First Results of the Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models Experiment , 2010 .

[3]  Y. Kagan,et al.  Earthquake Patterns in Diverse Tectonic Zones of the Globe , 2010 .

[4]  Jim Mori,et al.  Short Note Omori-Utsu Law c-Values Associated with Recent Moderate Earthquakes in Japan , 2009 .

[5]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[6]  Warner Marzocchi,et al.  Evidence of clustering and nonstationarity in the time distribution of large worldwide earthquakes , 2007 .

[7]  R. Tripathi.  Negative Binomial Distribution , 2006 .

[8]  E. Hauksson,et al.  Southern California Seismic Network Update , 2006 .

[9]  Edward H. Field,et al.  Overview of the Working Group for the Development of Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models (RELM) , 2005 .

[10]  A. W. Kemp,et al.  Univariate Discrete Distributions: Johnson/Univariate Discrete Distributions , 2005 .

[11]  Göran Ekström,et al.  Global seismicity of 2003: centroid–moment-tensor solutions for 1087 earthquakes , 2005 .

[12]  D. Sornette,et al.  Apparent clustering and apparent background earthquakes biased by undetected seismicity , 2005, physics/0501049.

[13]  D. Sornette,et al.  Power law distributions of seismic rates , 2004, physics/0412050.

[14]  D. Sornette,et al.  Power law distribution of seismic rates: theory and data analysis , 2004 .

[15]  Y. Kagan,et al.  Plate-Tectonic Analysis of Shallow Seismicity: Apparent Boundary Width, Beta, Corner Magnitude, Coupled Lithosphere Thickness, and Coupling in Seven Tectonic Settings , 2004 .

[16]  Y. Kagan.  Short-Term Properties of Earthquake Catalogs and Models of Earthquake Source , 2004 .

[17]  D. Vere-Jones,et al.  Analyzing earthquake clustering features by using stochastic reconstruction , 2004 .

[18]  F. Schoenberg,et al.  Approximating the Distribution of Pareto Sums , 2003 .

[19]  D. Sornette,et al.  Power-law Distributions of Offspring and Generation Numbers in Branching Models of Earthquake Triggering , 2003, cond-mat/0305007.

[20]  D. Sornette,et al.  Anomalous Scaling of Offspring and Generation Numbers in Branching Processes , 2003 .

[21]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Accuracy of modern global earthquake catalogs , 2003 .

[22]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Aftershock Zone Scaling , 2002 .

[23]  Laurent Massoulié,et al.  Hawkes branching point processes without ancestors , 2001, Journal of Applied Probability.

[24]  Y. Kagan,et al.  Probabilistic forecasting of earthquakes , 2000 .

[25]  M. Evans.  Statistical Distributions , 2000 .

[26]  Mihnea C. Oncescu,et al.  Paleoseismicity: Seismicity Evidence for Past Large Earthquakes , 2000 .

[27]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Testable Earthquake Forecasts for 1999 , 1999 .

[28]  Y. Ogata.  Space-Time Point-Process Models for Earthquake Occurrences , 1998 .

[29]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Comment on "The Gutenberg - Richter or characteristic earthquake distribution, which is it?" by S , 1996 .

[30]  Steven G. Wesnousky,et al.  The Gutenberg-Richter or characteristic earthquake distribution, which is it? , 1994 .

[31]  A. W. Kemp,et al.  Univariate Discrete Distributions , 1993 .

[32]  Lucile M. Jones,et al.  Local magnitudes and apparent variations in seismicity rates in Southern California , 1993 .

[33]  G. Papadopoulos,et al.  Poissonian and negative binomial modelling of earthquake time series in the Aegean area , 1992 .

[34]  A. W. Kemp,et al.  Generalized Poisson Distributions: Properties and Applications. , 1992 .

[35]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Likelihood analysis of earthquake catalogues , 1991 .

[36]  Michael J. LuValle,et al.  Generalized Poisson Distributions: Properties and Applications , 1990 .

[37]  Yosihiko Ogata,et al.  Statistical Models for Earthquake Occurrences and Residual Analysis for Point Processes , 1988 .

[38]  L. Knopoff,et al.  Statistical Short-Term Earthquake Prediction , 1987, Science.

[39]  R. E. Wheeler.  Statistical distributions , 1983, APLQ.

[40]  O. Nuttli.  Seismicity of the Southern California Region, 1 January 1932 to 31 December 1972 , 1974, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[41]  A. Hawkes.  Point Spectra of Some Mutually Exciting Point Processes , 1971 .

[42]  M. Nafi Toksöz,et al.  A clustering model for earthquake occurrences , 1970 .

[43]  C. Cornell.  Engineering seismic risk analysis , 1968 .

[44]  D. F. Hays,et al.  Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 1966 .

[45]  G. Patil.  Some Methods of Estimation for the Logarithmic Series Distribution , 1962 .

[46]  L. Gold.  Generalized poisson distributions , 1957 .

[47]  B. C. Brookes,et al.  An introduction to stochastic processes, with special reference to methods and applications , 1955 .

[48]  David A. Evans.  EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE CONCERNING CONTAGIOUS DISTRIBUTIONS IN ECOLOGY , 1953 .

[49]  W. Feller.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 1959 .

[50]  F. J. Anscombe,et al.  Sampling theory of the negative binomial and logarithmic series distributions. , 1950, Biometrika.

[51]  S. Wiemer,et al.  Earthquake Likelihood Model Testing , 2007 .

[52]  J. Hilbe.  Negative Binomial Regression: Preface , 2007 .

[53]  Danijel Schorlemmer,et al.  RELM Testing Center , 2007 .

[54]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Why Does Theoretical Physics Fail to Explain and Predict Earthquake Occurrence , 2006 .

[55]  Y. Kagan,et al.  Comment on " The Gutenberg-Richter or Characteristic Earthquake Distribution , Which Is It ? " by , 2005 .

[56]  D. Pfeffermann,et al.  Small area estimation , 2011 .

[57]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Long-term earthquake clustering , 1991 .

[58]  T. Yanagimoto,et al.  Estimation for the negative binomial distribution based on the conditional likelihood , 1990 .

[59]  I. M. Pyshik,et al.  Table of integrals, series, and products , 1965 .

[60]  R. F.,et al.  Mathematical Statistics , 1944, Nature.