Being like everybody else: the personal meanings of being a prosthesis user

Purpose. This study sought to gain an understanding of the lived experience of prosthesis use for amputees and people with congenital limb deficiency. Method. The primary data were transcripts derived from semi-structured interviews and the documentary analysis of two e-mail discussion groups for prosthesis users. This data was subject to an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Results. Three recurrent themes are presented. These are: Dreams and Realities: Enabling Prostheses; Being Like Everybody Else: The Meanings of Cosmesis; and Passing, Telling and Getting Away With It: Disguising Prosthesis Use. It is argued that prostheses have a number of deeply personal meanings for participants, which revolve around what people can practically achieve with a prosthetic limb, and the management of personal information and identity. Conclusions. The research outcomes suggest that it is important for health professionals involved in prosthesis users' medical care and personal welfare to facilitate the maintenance of these patients valued identities and the self management of their disability status.

[1]  Richard Schulz,et al.  Social and psychological factors in adjustment to limb amputation. , 1994 .

[2]  M Maclachlan,et al.  Adjustment to an Artificial Limb: A Qualitative Perspective , 2001, Journal of health psychology.

[3]  C. Murray,et al.  E-mail: A qualitative research medium for interviewing? , 1998 .

[4]  Jonathan A. Smith,et al.  Doing Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis , 1999 .

[5]  R. Hébert,et al.  Lower limb prosthesis utilisation by elderly amputees , 2000, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[6]  S. Millstein,et al.  Prosthetic Use in Adult Upper Limb Amputees: A Comparison of the Body Powered and Electrically Powered Prostheses , 1986, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[7]  B. Wilson,et al.  Factors Affecting Myoelectric Prosthetic Use and Wearing Patterns in the Juvenile Unilateral Below-Elbow Amputee , 1989 .

[8]  On embodiment: A case study of congenital limb deficiency in American culture , 1986, Culture, medicine and psychiatry.

[9]  M. J. Phillips,et al.  "Try harder": The experience of disability and the dilemma of normalization. , 1985 .

[10]  R. H. Meier,et al.  Comprehensive Management of the Upper-Limb Amputee , 1989, Springer New York.

[11]  J. A. Smith,et al.  Towards a relational self: social engagement during pregnancy and psychological preparation for motherhood. , 1999, The British journal of social psychology.

[12]  J. Paysant,et al.  [Evaluation of amputees]. , 2005, Annales de readaptation et de medecine physique : revue scientifique de la Societe francaise de reeducation fonctionnelle de readaptation et de medecine physique.

[13]  S. Kaiser,et al.  Stigmata and negotiated outcomes: Management of appearance by persons with physical disabilities , 1985 .

[14]  W H Eisma,et al.  Mobility of people with lower limb amputations: scales and questionnaires: a review , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[15]  G. Frank,et al.  Beyond Stigma: Visibility and Self‐Empowerment of Persons with Congenital Limb Deficiencies , 1988 .

[16]  C. Murray,et al.  The Social Meanings of Prosthesis Use , 2005, Journal of health psychology.

[17]  L. W. Friedmann,et al.  [The psychological rehabilitation of the amputee]. , 1978, [Kango gijutsu] : [Nursing technique].

[18]  R B Stein,et al.  Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses. , 1983, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  J Sixsmith,et al.  Ethical Issues in the Documentary Data Analysis of Internet Posts and Archives , 2001, Qualitative health research.

[20]  R. Delehanty,et al.  Effects of short-term group treatment on rehabilitation outcome of adults with amputations , 1995 .

[21]  J. Dolezal,et al.  Factors Associated with Use and Nonuse of an AK Prosthesis in a Rural, Southern, Geriatric Population , 1998 .

[22]  D. Wade Research into the black box of rehabilitation: the risks of a Type III error , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[23]  J. E. Dise-lewis,et al.  Psychological Adaptation to Limb Loss , 1989 .

[24]  Malcolm MacLachlan,et al.  Development and psychometric evaluation of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES). , 2000 .

[25]  R. Waters,et al.  Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.