Ideal observer analysis of crowding and the reduction of crowding through learning.

Crowding is a prominent phenomenon in peripheral vision where nearby objects impede one's ability to identify a target of interest. The precise mechanism of crowding is not known. We used ideal observer analysis and a noise-masking paradigm to identify the functional mechanism of crowding. We tested letter identification in the periphery with and without flanking letters and found that crowding increases equivalent input noise and decreases sampling efficiency. Crowding effectively causes the signal from the target to be noisier and at the same time reduces the visual system's ability to make use of a noisy signal. After practicing identification of flanked letters without noise in the periphery for 6 days, subjects' performance for identifying flanked letters improved (reduction of crowding). Across subjects, the improvement was attributable to either a decrease in crowding-induced equivalent input noise or an increase in sampling efficiency, but seldom both. This pattern of results is consistent with a simple model whereby learning reduces crowding by adjusting the spatial extent of a perceptual window used to gather relevant input features. Following learning, subjects with inappropriately large windows reduced their window sizes; while subjects with inappropriately small windows increased their window sizes. The improvement in equivalent input noise and sampling efficiency persists for at least 6 months.

[1]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Letter-recognition and reading speed in peripheral vision benefit from perceptual learning , 2004, Vision Research.

[2]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays , 1991, Vision Research.

[3]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  The viewpoint complexity of an object-recognition task , 1998, Vision Research.

[4]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  A. B. Sekuler,et al.  Signal but not noise changes with perceptual learning , 1999, Nature.

[6]  M C FLOM,et al.  VISUAL RESOLUTION AND CONTOUR INTERACTION. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[8]  D. Levi Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review , 2008, Vision Research.

[9]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Effect of retinal image motion on visual acuity and contour interaction in congenital nystagmus , 1995, Vision Research.

[10]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. II. Effects of contrast gain control, background variations, and white noise. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[12]  Denis G Pelli,et al.  An escape from crowding. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[13]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[14]  G. Legge,et al.  Contrast discrimination in noise. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  B. Dosher,et al.  Characterizing observers using external noise and observer models: assessing internal representations with external noise. , 2008, Psychological review.

[16]  B. Dosher,et al.  Characterizing human perceptual inefficiencies with equivalent internal noise. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[17]  D. Pelli,et al.  Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[18]  Jason M. Gold,et al.  An ideal observer analysis of variability in visual-only speech , 2005, Vision Research.

[19]  Bosco S. Tjan,et al.  Efficient integration across spatial frequencies for letter identification in foveal and peripheral vision. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[20]  S. Klein,et al.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[21]  Wendy L. Braje,et al.  Human efficiency for recognizing 3-D objects in luminance noise , 1995, Vision Research.

[22]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  S J Leat,et al.  Crowding in central and eccentric vision: the effects of contour interaction and attention. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[25]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[26]  B. Dosher,et al.  Perceptual learning of Gabor orientation identification in visual periphery: Complete inter-ocular transfer of learning mechanisms , 2005, Vision Research.

[27]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Lateral masking for letters with unlimited viewing time , 1971 .

[28]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[29]  Bosco S. Tjan,et al.  Learning letter identification in peripheral vision , 2005, Vision Research.

[30]  Anirvan S. Nandy,et al.  The nature of letter crowding as revealed by first- and second-order classification images. , 2007, Journal of Vision.

[31]  D. Pelli,et al.  The uncrowded window of object recognition , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size , 2002, Vision Research.

[33]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Perceptual learning in clear displays optimizes perceptual expertise: learning the limiting process. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  D G Pelli,et al.  Why use noise? , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[36]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Learning to identify crowded letters: Does it improve reading speed? , 2007, Vision Research.

[37]  Tracey D. Berger,et al.  Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. , 2007, Journal of vision.