Use of the Magnetic Field for Improving Gyroscopes' Biases Estimation

An accurate orientation is crucial to a satisfactory position in pedestrian navigation. The orientation estimation, however, is greatly affected by errors like the biases of gyroscopes. In order to minimize the error in the orientation, the biases of gyroscopes must be estimated and subtracted. In the state of the art it has been proposed, but not proved, that the estimation of the biases can be accomplished using magnetic field measurements. The objective of this work is to evaluate the effectiveness of using magnetic field measurements to estimate the biases of medium-cost micro-electromechanical sensors (MEMS) gyroscopes. We carry out the evaluation with experiments that cover both, quasi-error-free turn rate and magnetic measurements and medium-cost MEMS turn rate and magnetic measurements. The impact of different homogeneous magnetic field distributions and magnetically perturbed environments is analyzed. Additionally, the effect of the successful biases subtraction on the orientation and the estimated trajectory is detailed. Our results show that the use of magnetic field measurements is beneficial to the correct biases estimation. Further, we show that different magnetic field distributions affect differently the biases estimation process. Moreover, the biases are likewise correctly estimated under perturbed magnetic fields. However, for indoor and urban scenarios the biases estimation process is very slow.

[1]  Eric Foxlin,et al.  Pedestrian tracking with shoe-mounted inertial sensors , 2005, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[2]  Mohammed Khider,et al.  Optimal sampling frequency and bias error modeling for foot-mounted IMUs , 2013, International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation.

[3]  Naser El-Sheimy,et al.  Swarm Optimization-Based Magnetometer Calibration for Personal Handheld Devices , 2012, Sensors.

[4]  Agus Budiyono,et al.  Principles of GNSS, Inertial, and Multi-sensor Integrated Navigation Systems , 2012 .

[5]  Fabian de Ponte Müller,et al.  Evaluation of AHRS algorithms for inertial personal localization in industrial environments , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT).

[6]  Paul D. Groves,et al.  Principles of GNSS, Inertial, and Multi-sensor Integrated Navigation Systems , 2012 .

[7]  A.H. Haddad,et al.  Applied optimal estimation , 1976, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  Ram Dantu,et al.  Magnetic Maps for Indoor Navigation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[9]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Calibration of Miniature Inertial and Magnetic Sensor Units for Robust Attitude Estimation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[10]  Alexander J. Szalai International Sample Survey. (Book Reviews: The Use of Time. Daily Activities of Urban and Suburban Populations in Twelve Countries) , 1974 .

[11]  Chong Shen,et al.  Optimization and Experimentation of Dual-Mass MEMS Gyroscope Quadrature Error Correction Methods , 2016, Sensors.

[12]  Robert E. Mahony,et al.  Nonlinear Complementary Filters on the Special Orthogonal Group , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[13]  Xiaoli Meng,et al.  Quaternion-Based Kalman Filter With Vector Selection for Accurate Orientation Tracking , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[14]  Jörg F. Wagner,et al.  Integrating satellite and inertial navigation—conventional and new fusion approaches , 2001 .

[15]  Melanie Hartmann,et al.  Spacecraft Attitude Determination And Control , 2016 .

[16]  Chan Gook Park,et al.  Kinematic Model-Based Pedestrian Dead Reckoning for Heading Correction and Lower Body Motion Tracking , 2015, Sensors.

[17]  P. Robertson,et al.  Unscented Kalman filter and Magnetic Angular Rate Update (MARU) for an improved Pedestrian Dead-Reckoning , 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium.

[18]  Valérie Renaudin,et al.  Magnetic, Acceleration Fields and Gyroscope Quaternion (MAGYQ)-Based Attitude Estimation with Smartphone Sensors for Indoor Pedestrian Navigation , 2014, Sensors.

[19]  Angelo M. Sabatini,et al.  How Angular Velocity Features and Different Gyroscope Noise Types Interact and Determine Orientation Estimation Accuracy , 2015, Sensors.

[20]  Jiancheng Fang,et al.  Error Analysis and Gyro-Bias Calibration of Analytic Coarse Alignment for Airborne POS , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[21]  G. Lachapelle,et al.  Use of magnetic quasi static field (QSF) updates for pedestrian navigation , 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium.

[22]  Estefania Munoz Diaz,et al.  Standalone inertial pocket navigation system , 2014, 2014 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium - PLANS 2014.

[23]  Bing Luo,et al.  Observability Analysis of a MEMS INS/GPS Integration System with Gyroscope G-Sensitivity Errors , 2014, Sensors.

[24]  Sebastian O. H. Madgwick,et al.  An efficient orientation filter for inertial and inertial / magnetic sensor arrays , 2010 .

[25]  Estefania Munoz Diaz Inertial Pocket Navigation System: Unaided 3D Positioning , 2015, Sensors.

[26]  R. Fox,et al.  Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. , 1999 .

[27]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[28]  Sheng Liu,et al.  A Dual-Linear Kalman Filter for Real-Time Orientation Determination System Using Low-Cost MEMS Sensors , 2016, Sensors.

[29]  Isaac Skog,et al.  Performance characterisation of foot-mounted ZUPT-aided INSs and other related systems , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation.

[30]  Valérie Renaudin,et al.  Use of Earth’s Magnetic Field for Mitigating Gyroscope Errors Regardless of Magnetic Perturbation , 2011, Sensors.