Urban Land Area and Population Growth: A New Scaling Relationship for Metropolitan Expansion

In most metropolitan regions throughout the globe, urbanised land area is increasing to accommodate increasing population size. This article provides a simple yet powerful mathematical description of this urban expansion. Specifically, the following scaling relationship is proposed: land area (A) increases proportionally to population size (P) raised to a power (n)— i.e. A ∝ P n. During 1950—2000, this relationship is found to hold well for US Census urban areas (UAs) with a greater than 10 per cent increase in population. Values for the parameter n vary among UAs, with a central tendency value of ∼ 2, suggesting that, on average, newcomers to urban areas occupy about twice the land area per capita of existing residents. If n were exactly equal to 2, then the parameter group P/√A (called `linear population density', or LPD) would be constant over time. LPD (units: people per metre) is the number of people in a metre-wide strip across an urban area. LPD is distinct from, and behaves somewhat differently than, population density. Distributions of LPD values among US UAs during 1950—2000 show surprisingly little variability over multidecade time-scales. For example, from 1950 to 2000, average population, land area and population density changed by more than a factor of 2, but average LPD changed less than 10 per cent. Few, if any, other attributes of urban form have remained so constant during this half-century time-period. International data corroborate the finding that LPD distributions are roughly constant over multidecadal time-scales. These results suggest an underlying pattern to how people arrange themselves within and among urban areas. For US UAs, rank—size rules similar to the generalised version of Zipf's rule hold for population, land area, LPD and population density. LPD is an important predictor of the emissions-to-inhalation relationship for motor vehicle emissions. Results presented here are important for theoretical, practical and empirical investigations of urban form and of how urban areas expand over time.

[1]  Tracy L. Thatcher,et al.  Inhalation Transfer Factors for Air Pollution Health Risk Assessment , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[2]  The Panexponential Monocentric Model , 2000 .

[3]  D. Pumain Scaling laws and urban systems , 2004 .

[4]  J. E. Anderson,et al.  The changing structure of a city: temporal changes in cubic spline urban density patterns. , 1985, Journal of regional science.

[5]  William W. Nazaroff,et al.  Intake fraction of nonreactive vehicle emissions in US urban areas , 2005 .

[6]  X. Gabaix Zipf's Law for Cities: An Explanation , 1999 .

[7]  Bruce E. Newling Urban Growth and Spatial Structure: Mathematical Models and Empirical Evidence , 1966 .

[8]  C. Clark Urban Population Densities , 1951 .

[9]  M. Batty,et al.  Form Follows Function: Reformulating Urban Population Density Functions , 1992 .

[10]  Xiao-Ping Zheng Metropolitan Spatial Structure and its Determinants: A Case-study of Tokyo , 1991 .

[11]  E. Mills,et al.  A Comparison of Urban Population Density Functions in Developed and Developing Countries , 1980 .

[12]  Elizabeth Deakin,et al.  Inhalation of motor vehicle emissions: effects of urban population and land area , 2006 .

[13]  Michael A. Goldberg,et al.  Urban Form in Canada and the United States: an Examination of Urban Density Gradients , 1985 .

[14]  Yannis M. Ioannides,et al.  Zipf’s law for cities : an empirical examination , 2000 .

[15]  H. Frumkin Urban Sprawl and Public Health , 2002, Public health reports.

[16]  J. Sallis,et al.  Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: findings from SMARTRAQ. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[17]  A. Skaburskis Inversions in Urban Density Gradients: A Brief Look at the Vancouver Metropolitan Area's Density Profile , 1989 .

[18]  T. Bunting,et al.  Density Gradients in Canadian Metropolitan Regions, 1971-96: Differential Patterns of Central Area and Suburban Growth and Change , 2002 .

[19]  D. Helbing,et al.  Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .

[21]  H. Dittmar,et al.  Location Efficiency: Neighborhood and Socio-Economic Characteristics Determine Auto Ownership and Use - Studies in Chicago, Los Angeles and San Francisco , 2002 .

[22]  K. Small,et al.  URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURE. , 1997 .

[23]  Duncan Black,et al.  Urban evolution in the USA , 2003 .

[24]  J. B. Rosser The Dynamics of Ghetto Boundary Movement and Ghetto Shape , 1980 .

[25]  D. Stern Historical path-dependence of the urban population density gradient , 1993 .

[26]  Mary H. Mulry,et al.  Summary of Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation for Census 2000 , 2006 .

[27]  O. Jolliet,et al.  Defining intake fraction. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Atsushi Tsunekawa,et al.  Trends in urbanization and patterns of land use in the Asian mega cities Jakarta, Bangkok, and Metro Manila , 2005 .

[29]  K. Woodrow,et al.  Estimation of population coverage in the 1990 United States census based on demographic analysis. , 1993, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[30]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis , 2001 .

[31]  Bruce E. Newling The Spatial Variation of Urban Population Densities , 1969 .

[32]  Carlos M. Urzúa A simple and efficient test for Zipf's law , 2000 .

[33]  S. Angel,et al.  The dynamics of global urban expansion , 2005 .