Elasticity and microfibrillar angle in the wood of Sitka spruce

The initial value of Young’s modulus, E, has been measured for small specimens of Sitka spruce wood taken from the annual rings of two disks and has been found in both cases to increase from pith to bark. The decrease from pith to bark in the helical angle θ of the cellulose microfibrils in the walls of the tracheids averaged over an annual ring has been determined from matched specimens. E has been found to vary regularly with θ. Two mathematical models of the cell involved have been developed and the experimental findings applied to the relations derived between E and θ. The first model was that of a number of helical springs free to slip, twist and bend and gave a relationship between the helical angle and the reciprocal of Young’s modulus as proportional to tan2 θ. The second model, that of an anisotropic homogeneous cell wall, gave 1/E as being proportional to a quadratic function in sin2 θ. Relative shear in the cell wall has been predicted from this latter model. The tan2 θ relation is found to hold provided θ is less than about 40°. The sin2 θ relation holds, on the other hand, over the full range of θ observed. Some implications of these relations are discussed.

[1]  A. Wardrop,et al.  Organisation of the Cell Walls of Tracheids and Wood Fibres , 1947, Nature.

[2]  A. Love,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Elasticity. , 1928 .

[3]  A. Wardrop,et al.  The fine structure of the wall of the conifer tracheid V. The organization of the secondary wall in relation to the growth rate of the cambium , 1950 .

[4]  R. Preston.  The fine structure of the wall of the conifer tracheid I. The X-ray diagram of conifer wood , 1946, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[5]  L. C. Spark,et al.  Structure and mechanical properties of vegetable fibres. I. The influence of strain on the orientation of cellulose microfibrils in sisal leaf fibre , 1957, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[6]  J. Hearle.  The fine structure of fibers and crystalline polymers. III. Interpretation of the mechanical properties of fibers , 1963 .

[7]  F. B. Hildebrand,et al.  Introduction To Numerical Analysis , 1957 .

[8]  A. Wardrop.  The Fine Structure of the Conifer Tracheid , 1954 .

[9]  W. Cǒté.  Cellular ultrastructure of woody plants , 1965 .

[10]  A. Wardrop,et al.  The submicroscopic organization of the walls of conifer cambium , 1949 .

[11]  L. Treloar.  Calculations of elastic moduli of polymer crystals: III. Cellulose , 1960 .

[12]  R. Preston.  The fine structure of the wall of the conifer tracheid. II. Optical properties of dissected walls in Pinus insignis , 1947, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[13]  R. Preston.  The Organization of the Cell Wall of the Conifer Tracheid , 1934 .

[14]  R. Meredith.  13—MOLECULAR ORIENTATION AND THE TENSILE PROPERTIES OF COTTON FIBRES , 1946 .

[15]  A. Wardrop,et al.  The Submicroscopic Organization of the Cell Wall in Conifer Tracheides and Wood Fibres , 1951 .

[16]  M. Probine.  Cell Growth and the Structure and Mechanical Properties of the Wall in Internodal Cells of Nitella opaca: III. SPIRAL GROWTH AND CELL WALL STRUCTURE , 1963 .

[17]  F. Brauns.  The chemistry of lignin , 1952 .

[18]  G. Clark,et al.  X-Ray Method for Quantitative Comparison of Crystalline Orientation in Cellulose Fibers , 1933 .

[19]  L. C. Spark,et al.  22—STRUCTURE AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF VEGETABLE FIBRES: II. A MICRO-EXTENSOMETER FOR THE AUTOMATIC RECORDING OF LOAD-EXTENSION CURVES FOR SINGLE FIBROUS CELLS , 1958 .