Trigger events that indicate the need for proxy decision-making in cognitively impaired older persons

The purpose of this exploratory study was to ascertain the primary event or “trigger” that prompted caregivers to initiate planning for a change in monitoring or substitute decision-making needed for the older person receiving their care. Understanding the impetus to make this decision can help caregivers to anticipate needs and plan accordingly. Caregivers from the community who did not choose guardianship (N=39) and caregivers who were court-appointed guardians or conservators (N=22) were compared for their views about the trigger events, the views of their own health, number of hours in caregiving and the circumstances surrounding the decision-making experience. Three categories of trigger events were identified: • Physical; • Emotional/cognitive; and • Situational events with the vast majority of triggers falling into the first two categories. Guardians as a group were younger, provided fewer hours of caregiving and rated themselves healthier than the other caregivers. A variety of situational stressors were identified by respondents with time and financial concerns the primary concerns. Further research with a wider variety of caregiving dyads is recommended to examine the decision-making process involved and to further validate the categorization of trigger events.

[1]  D. Kjervik,et al.  Retrospective analysis of guardians' perceptions of cognitively impaired elderly. , 1992, Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

[2]  J. Retsinas Triggers to nursing home placement. , 1991, Geriatric nursing.

[3]  H. Nygaard Who cares for the caregiver? Factors exerting influence on nursing home admissions of demented elderly. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[4]  M. Lieberman,et al.  Factors affecting decisions to institutionalize demented elderly. , 1991, The Gerontologist.

[5]  A. Satlin Family involvement in treatment of the frail elderly , 1991 .

[6]  M. E. Williams,et al.  Why screen for functional disability in elderly persons? , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[7]  D. Kjervik,et al.  Dilemmas in decision making for caregivers of cognitively impaired elderly persons. , 1989, Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

[8]  H S Wilson,et al.  Family Caregiving for a Relative With Alzheimer's Dementia: Coping with Negative Choices , 1989, Nursing research.

[9]  M. Z. Goldstein Family involvement in treatment of the frail elderly , 1989 .

[10]  L. George,et al.  Predictors of Institutionalization Among Caregivers of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease , 1986, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[11]  B. Lebowitz,et al.  Families, Informal Supports,and Alzheimer's Disease , 1985, Research on aging.

[12]  Bobbe Shapiro Nolan Functional Evaluation of the Elderly in Guardianship Proceedings , 1984, Law, medicine & health care : a publication of the American Society of Law & Medicine.

[13]  V. Kilpack Ethical issues and procedural dilemmas in measuring patient competence , 1984, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[14]  A. Maslow Motivation and Personality , 1954 .