Spectral Mixture Analysis of Hyperspectral Scenes Using Intelligently Selected Training Samples

In this letter, we address the use of artificial neural networks for spectral mixture analysis of hyperspectral scenes. We specifically focus on the issue of how to effectively train neural network architectures in the context of spectral mixture analysis applications. To address this issue, a multilayer perceptron neural architecture is combined with techniques for intelligent selection and labeling of training samples directly obtained from the input data, thus maximizing the information that can be obtained from those samples while reducing the need for a priori information about the scene. The proposed approach is compared to unconstrained and fully constrained linear mixture models using hyperspectral data sets acquired (in the laboratory) from artificial forest scenes, using the compact airborne spectrographic imaging system. The Spreading of Photons for Radiation INTerception (SPRINT) canopy model, which assumes detailed knowledge about object geometry, was employed to evaluate the results obtained by the different methods. Our results show that the proposed approach, when trained with both pure and mixed training samples (generated automatically without prior information) can provide similar results to those provided by SPRINT, using very few labeled training samples. An application to real airborne data using a set of hyperspectral images collected at different altitudes by the digital airborne imaging spectrometer 7915 and the reflective optics system imaging spectrometer, operating simultaneously at multiple spatial resolutions, is also presented and discussed.

[1]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  A semilabeled-sample-driven bagging technique for ill-posed classification problems , 2005, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[2]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Estimation of number of spectrally distinct signal sources in hyperspectral imagery , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Weiguo Liu,et al.  Comparison of non-linear mixture models: sub-pixel classification , 2005 .

[4]  Paul E. Johnson,et al.  Spectral mixture modeling: A new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander 1 Site , 1986 .

[5]  Mario Winter,et al.  N-FINDR: an algorithm for fast autonomous spectral end-member determination in hyperspectral data , 1999, Optics & Photonics.

[6]  Jouko Lampinen,et al.  Bayesian MLP neural networks for image analysis , 2000, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[7]  John F. Mustard,et al.  Spectral unmixing , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[8]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[9]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Joint linear/nonlinear spectral unmixing of hyperspectral image data , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[10]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  A quantitative and comparative analysis of linear and nonlinear spectral mixture models using radial basis function neural networks , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  John R. Miller,et al.  Investigation of linear spectral mixtures of the reflectance spectra using laboratory simulated forest scenes , 2002, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[12]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Nonlinear mixture models for analyzing laboratory simulated-forest hyperspectral data , 2004, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[13]  Elisabetta Binaghi,et al.  Comparison of the multilayer perceptron with neuro-fuzzy techniques in the estimation of cover class mixture in remotely sensed data , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  The significance of border training patterns in classification by a feedforward neural network using back propagation learning , 1999 .

[15]  Bernard A. Engel,et al.  Optimization of training data required for neuro-classification , 1994 .

[16]  S. Gerstl,et al.  Nonlinear spectral mixing models for vegetative and soil surfaces , 1994 .

[17]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Fully constrained least squares linear spectral mixture analysis method for material quantification in hyperspectral imagery , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  Richard L. Thompson,et al.  A snapshot of canopy reflectance models and a universal model for the radiation regime , 2000 .

[19]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  A quantitative and comparative analysis of endmember extraction algorithms from hyperspectral data , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.