Voter involvement, fiscal autonomy and public sector efficiency: evidence from German municipalities

[1]  Gábor Tóka.  Citizen information, election outcomes and good governance , 2008 .

[2]  Philip Andrew Stevens,et al.  Assessing the Performance of Local Government , 2005, National Institute Economic Review.

[3]  Philip Stevens.  Accounting for Background Variables in Stochastic Frontier Analysis , 2004 .

[4]  Carles Boix,et al.  Social Capital: Explaining Its Origins and Effects on Government Performance , 1998, British Journal of Political Science.

[5]  William H. Greene,et al.  Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model , 2005 .

[6]  W. Oates,et al.  The Analysis of Revenue Sharing in a New Approach to Collective Fiscal Decisions , 1971 .

[7]  R. Thaler,et al.  The Flypaper Effect , 1995 .

[8]  B. Geys,et al.  Research Area Markets and Politics Research Unit Market Processes and Governance Schwerpunkt Märkte Und Politik Abteilung Marktprozesse Und Steuerung Measuring Local Government Technical (in)efficiency: an Application and Comparison of Fdh, Dea and Econometric Approaches Iii Abstract Measuring Local , 2022 .

[9]  G. Battese,et al.  A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data , 1995 .

[10]  P. Squire,et al.  Residential Mobility and Voter Turnout , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[11]  Thomas R. Rochon,et al.  Are All Associations Alike? , 1998 .

[12]  Pamela Paxton.  Social Capital and Democracy: An Interdependent Relationship , 2002, American Sociological Review.

[13]  G. Tabellini,et al.  Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy , 2000 .

[14]  David Dreyer Lassen,et al.  Fiscal Transparency, Political Parties, and Debt in OECD Countries , 2003 .

[15]  Mark R. Lindblad,et al.  Performance Measurement in Local Economic Development , 2006 .

[16]  B. Geys,et al.  How to make head or tail of 'bridging' and 'bonding'?: addressing the methodological ambiguity. , 2008, The British journal of sociology.

[17]  D. Prior,et al.  On the determinants of local government performance: A two-stage nonparametric approach , 2007 .

[18]  B. Geys,et al.  Towards an Empirical Characterization of 'Bridging' and 'Bonding' Social Capital , 2006 .

[19]  James B. Rebitzer,et al.  Monitoring, Motivation and Management: The Determinants of Opportunistic Behavior in a Field Experiment , 2002 .

[20]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  Social Structure and Citizenship: Examining the Impacts of Social Setting, Network Heterogeneity, and Informational Variables on Political Participation , 2004 .

[21]  J. Kalseth,et al.  POLITICAL CONTROL OF ADMINISTRATIVE SPENDING: THE CASE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN NORWAY* , 1998 .

[22]  Henry Tulkens,et al.  Cost efficiency in Belgian municipalities , 1993 .

[23]  B. Heyndels,et al.  Asymmetries in the flypaper effect: empirical evidence for the Flemish municipalities , 2001 .

[24]  D. Mueller,et al.  Interest groups and the size of government , 1986 .

[25]  Koleman Strumpf.  A predictive index for the flypaper effect , 1998 .

[26]  K. Kerstens,et al.  Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments: A comparative analysis of FDH, DEA, and econometric approaches , 1996 .

[27]  P. Seabright.  Accountability and decentralisation in government: An incomplete contracts model , 1996 .

[28]  Min Shi,et al.  Political budget cycles: Do they differ across countries and why? , 2006 .

[29]  J. Laffont,et al.  Using Cost Observation to Regulate Firms , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[30]  Torberg Falch,et al.  Public sector efficiency: the roles of political and budgetary institutions, fiscal capacity, and democratic participation , 2008 .

[31]  Ben Lockwood,et al.  Decentralization and Electoral Accountability: Incentives, Separation and Voter Welfare , 2005 .

[32]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[33]  Leslie Rosenthal,et al.  The growth and efficiency of public spending , 1988 .

[34]  Benny Geys,et al.  Exploring sources of local government technical inefficiency: evidence from Flemish municipalities [Ursachenforschung zur technischen Ineffizienz kommunaler Verwaltungen: Evidenz von flämischen Gemeindeverwaltungen] , 2008 .

[35]  K. Moene.  Types of bureaucratic interaction , 1986 .

[36]  Bruno S. Frey,et al.  Shirking or work morale?: The impact of regulating , 1993 .

[37]  B. Geys,et al.  Measuring the Bridging Nature of Voluntary Organizations: The Importance of Association Size , 2007 .

[38]  J. Vanneste,et al.  Explaining differences in productive efficiency: An application to Belgian municipalities , 1994 .

[39]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[40]  HarryG. Barkma.  Do Top Managers Work Harder When They Are Monitored , 1995 .

[41]  Oliver Himmler,et al.  Could you hand me the efficiency section, please? Newspaper circulation and local government efficiency in Norway , 2008 .

[42]  B. Geys,et al.  Looking Across Borders: A Test of Spatial Policy Interdependence Using Local Government Efficiency Ratings , 2006 .

[43]  W. Meeusen,et al.  Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error , 1977 .

[44]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[45]  B. Heyndels,et al.  Fiscal illusion at the local level: Empirical evidence for the Flemish municipalities , 1994 .

[46]  Tomoyasu Tanaka.  The Economic Effect of Information Technology in Japanese Local Governments , 2006 .

[47]  W. Niskanen.  Bureaucrats and Politicians , 1975, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[48]  D. Mueller.  Public Choice III: What have we learned? , 1979 .

[49]  A. Worthington.  Cost Efficiency in Australian Local Government: A Comparative Analysis of Mathematical Programming anf Econometrical Approaches , 2000 .

[50]  D. Jorgenson,et al.  TRANSCENDENTAL LOGARITHMIC PRODUCTION FRONTIERS , 1973 .

[51]  I. Barankay,et al.  Decentralization and the Productive Efficiency of Government: Evidence from Swiss Cantons , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[52]  B. Frey.  Does Monitoring Increase Work Effort? The Rivalry with Trust and Loyalty , 1993 .

[53]  William N. Dunn,et al.  Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction , 1993 .

[54]  Antreas D. Athanassopoulos,et al.  Assessing Aggregate Cost Efficiency And The Related Policy Implications For Greek Local Municipalities , 1998 .

[55]  Kenneth S. Chan,et al.  Institutions, efficiency and the strategic behaviour of sponsors and bureaus , 1988 .

[56]  Marie-Claire Villeval,et al.  Does Monitoring Decrease Work Effort? The Complementarity between Agency and Crowding-Out Theories , 2004, Games Econ. Behav..

[57]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Moral Hazard and Observability , 1979 .

[58]  Philip J. Grossman,et al.  Public Sector Technical Inefficiency in Large U.S. Cities , 1999 .

[59]  N. Nie,et al.  Participation in America : Political Democracy and Social Equality , 1972 .

[60]  K. Kerstens,et al.  What is known about municipal efficiency: the Belgian case and beyond , 2000 .

[61]  D. Aigner,et al.  P. Schmidt, 1977,?Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models,? , 1977 .

[62]  Olson Mancur,et al.  The Principle of "Fiscal Equivalence": The Division of Responsibilities among Different Levels of Government , 1969 .