Accumulating and visualising tacit knowledge of teachers on educational assessments

Assessments, embedded with teachers' implicit (i.e. tacit) domain knowledge, play an important role in evaluating 'comprehension of a subject. The knowledge on the importance of both the concepts and their relationships of a subject, if captured, made explicit, and shared around, may greatly help teachers construct more effective assessments. This study establishes a methodology to accumulate tacit knowledge of specific topics from collected assessments by using an implicit knowledge extraction mechanism and, visualises the overall importance distribution of concepts by using knowledge maps for helping teachers compile their assessments. Several two stage experiments, scheduled for one semester, were conducted in the third grade natural science courses at elementary schools in Taiwan. Eighteen teachers who actually teach the courses participated in the experiments, and thirty students were in each course. In the first stage, teachers compiled assessments without using IKMAAS's knowledge map features while in the second stage, they did use them. System usage records, questionnaires and interview results were used for evaluating the usability of the methodology and the satisfaction of using IKMAAS. The results indicate the potential of the methodology, as each of the teachers agreed that the visualised assessment knowledge helped them to comprehend the proportions of concepts they intended to test easily and, additionally, helped them to clearly notice concepts they may have ignored. Yet the results in this study also show the potential of using knowledge maps and knowledge accumulating methodology in pedagogy paradigm.

[1]  Yueting Xu,et al.  Teacher Assessment Knowledge and Practice: A Narrative Inquiry of a Chinese College EFL Teacher's Experience , 2009 .

[2]  S. Arkoudis,et al.  Tensions between validity and outcomes: teacher assessment of written work of recently arrived immigrant ESL students , 2004 .

[3]  B. Frey,et al.  Item-writing rules: Collective wisdom , 2005 .

[4]  Brian R. Gaines,et al.  Concept maps as hypermedia components , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  Jingyuan Zhao,et al.  School knowledge management framework and strategies: The new perspective on teacher professional development , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Jyh-Bin Yang,et al.  Developing a knowledge map for construction scheduling using a novel approach , 2007 .

[7]  Raymond W. Kulhavy,et al.  Maps, Mode of Text Presentation, and Children’s Prose Learning , 1986 .

[8]  Yuen-Hsien Tseng,et al.  Mining concept maps from news stories for measuring civic scientific literacy in media , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Petr Kveton,et al.  Computer-based tests: the impact of test design and problem of equivalency , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  Tzone-I Wang,et al.  Construction and analysis of educational assessments using knowledge maps with weight appraisal of concepts , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Yoshitaka Kuwata,et al.  Managing Knowledge using a Semantic-Network , 1997 .

[12]  Michel Mitri,et al.  Applying tacit knowledge management techniques for performance assessment , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Kai Mertins,et al.  Knowledge management : concepts and best practices , 2003 .

[14]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[15]  G. Cizek,et al.  Teachers' Assessment Practices: Preparation, Isolation, and the Kitchen Sink , 1995 .

[16]  Ann Nevin,et al.  Collaborative Teaching for Teacher Educators--What Does the Research Say?. , 2009 .

[17]  C. Davison The contradictory culture of teacher-based assessment: ESL teacher assessment practices in Australian and Hong Kong secondary schools , 2004 .

[18]  Anbo Meng,et al.  Genetic algorithm based multi-agent system applied to test generation , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Daniel E. O'Leary,et al.  Knowledge management for best practices , 2000, CACM.

[20]  Terry D Carroll,et al.  Teacher-Made Tests , 2006 .

[21]  Michael Verdi,et al.  Learning with Maps and Texts: An Overview , 2002 .

[22]  Ruey-Shiang Shaw,et al.  A study of learning performance of e-learning materials design with knowledge maps , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Lu Liu,et al.  A Method for Enterprise Knowledge Map Construction Based on Social Classification , 2009, CONFENIS.

[24]  Yu-Cheng Lin,et al.  Enhancing knowledge exchange through web map-based knowledge management system in construction: Lessons learned in Taiwan , 2006 .

[25]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[26]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  Knowledge Maps as Scaffolds for Cognitive Processing , 2002 .

[27]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A Particle Swarm Optimization Approach to Composing Serial Test Sheets for Multiple Assessment Criteria , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[28]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A multi-expert approach for developing testing and diagnostic systems based on the concept-effect model , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[29]  L. Shepard The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture , 2000 .

[30]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987 .

[31]  Jacky Wai-cheong Pow,et al.  The interactive use of a video database in teacher education: Creating a knowledge base for teaching through a learning community , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Ya-Ting Carolyn Yang,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation criteria for English learning websites using expert validity surveys , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Olusola O. Adesope,et al.  Learning With Concept and Knowledge Maps: A Meta-Analysis , 2006 .