Performance Analysis of Shortest Path Bridging Control Protocols

Ethernet networks are evolving from the enterprise to the carrier thus facing new demands and requirements. Therefore, a set of new control approaches are being defined for Ethernet. Amongst these, IEEE 802.1aq Shortest Path Bridging (SPB) aims to assure the transmission of unicast and multicast frames on the shortest path in a bridged network. Three protocols have been proposed for the control of SPB. This paper provides an extensive analysis of these proposals based on simulations focusing on protocol convergence time, which is a key attribute of carrier grade networks. The simulation model was created based on recent measurements. Furthermore, the analysis presented in the paper provides reference for further development of Ethernet control protocols.

[1]  Olivier Bonaventure,et al.  Achieving sub-second IGP convergence in large IP networks , 2005, CCRV.

[2]  Don Fedyk,et al.  Provider link state bridging , 2008, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[3]  János Farkas,et al.  Performance of rapid spanning tree protocol in access and metro networks , 2007, 2007 Second International Conference on Access Networks & Workshops.

[4]  M. Seaman.  Shortest Path Bridging , 2004 .

[5]  Eugene Ch'ng,et al.  Rethinking the service model: Scaling Ethernet to a million nodes , 2004 .

[6]  Cengiz Alaettinoglu,et al.  Performance comparison of routing protocols using MaRS: distance-vector versus link-state , 1992, SIGMETRICS '92/PERFORMANCE '92.

[7]  Virtual Bridged,et al.  IEEE Standards for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Specification for 802.3 Full Duplex Operation , 1997, IEEE Std 802.3x-1997 and IEEE Std 802.3y-1997 (Supplement to ISO/IEC 8802-3: 1996/ANSI/IEEE Std 802.3, 1996 Edition).

[8]  Janos Farkas,et al.  Root Controlled Bridging: A scalable control protocol for Shortest Path Bridging , 2008, Networks 2008 - The 13th International Telecommunications Network Strategy and Planning Symposium.

[9]  Leslie Daigle,et al.  WHOIS Protocol Specification , 2004, RFC.

[10]  Tony Li,et al.  Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) Extensions for Traffic Engineering (TE) , 2004, RFC.