Influence maximization in online social network using different centrality measures as seed node of information propagation

Information propagation in the network is probabilistic in nature; simultaneously, it depends on the connecting paths of the propagation. Selection of seed nodes plays an important role in determining the levels and depth of the contagion in the network. This paper presents a comparative study when seed nodes for information propagation are selected through the properties of different centrality measures in the social network. This study captures the interaction measures of nodes in the social network, selects seed nodes based on five centrality measures, i.e. degree distribution, betweenness centrality, closeness centrality, Eigenvector and PageRank, and compares the affected nodes and levels of propagation within the network. We demonstrate the performance of the different centrality measures by processing three datasets of social network: Twitter network, Bitcoin network and author collaborative network. For the propagation of the information, we use breadth-first search (BFS) and susceptible–infectious–recovered (SIR) model and a detailed comparative study is also presented for each of the seed nodes selected using aforementioned network properties. Results show that the Eigenvector centrality and PageRank centrality measures outperform other centrality measures in all test cases in terms of propagation level and affected nodes during information propagation. Both Eigenvector and PageRank network data processing required a high computational overhead. For this reason we propose a hybrid model where using k-core the network is degenerated into a smaller network and centrality nodes are extracted from the smaller network. These centrality nodes, as compared to original centrality nodes, perform almost in the same manner in terms of influence maximization when k is chosen in a rational way.

[1]  Jimeng Sun,et al.  A Survey of Models and Algorithms for Social Influence Analysis , 2011, Social Network Data Analytics.

[2]  Wanlei Zhou,et al.  Identifying Propagation Source in Time-Varying Networks , 2018, Malicious Attack Propagation and Source Identification.

[3]  Pericles A. Mitkas,et al.  Event identification in web social media through named entity recognition and topic modeling , 2013, Data Knowl. Eng..

[4]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Absence of influential spreaders in rumor dynamics , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Richard F. Deckro,et al.  An Analytical Comparison of Social Network Measures , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems.

[6]  Bin Wu,et al.  A link clustering based overlapping community detection algorithm , 2013, Data Knowl. Eng..

[7]  Haoran Xie,et al.  Social emotion classification based on noise-aware training , 2017, Data Knowl. Eng..

[8]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Mapping social dynamics on Facebook: The Brexit debate , 2017, Soc. Networks.

[9]  Min Song,et al.  An adaptable fine-grained sentiment analysis for summarization of multiple short online reviews , 2017, Data Knowl. Eng..

[10]  M. Newman Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[12]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Edge Weight Prediction in Weighted Signed Networks , 2016, 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM).

[13]  Luciano da Fontoura Costa,et al.  The role of centrality for the identification of influential spreaders in complex networks , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Diego Noble,et al.  An Analysis of Centrality Measures for Complex and Social Networks , 2016, 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[15]  A MitkasPericles,et al.  Event identification in web social media through named entity recognition and topic modeling , 2013 .

[16]  Dayou Liu,et al.  Hierarchical community detection with applications to real-world network analysis , 2013, Data Knowl. Eng..

[17]  M. De Domenico,et al.  The Anatomy of a Scientific Rumor , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[18]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[19]  Davide Buscaldi,et al.  From humor recognition to irony detection: The figurative language of social media , 2012, Data Knowl. Eng..

[20]  Esteban Moro Egido,et al.  The dynamical strength of social ties in information spreading , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  Li Guo,et al.  Topic-aware Social Influence Minimization , 2015, WWW.

[22]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[23]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network , 2003, KDD '03.

[24]  Sameep Mehta,et al.  A study of rumor control strategies on social networks , 2010, CIKM.

[25]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  The dynamics of viral marketing , 2005, EC '06.

[26]  Leonardo Brenner,et al.  Influence Maximization in Independent Cascade Networks Based on Activation Probability Computation , 2019, IEEE Access.

[27]  Barbara Poblete,et al.  Twitter under crisis: can we trust what we RT? , 2010, SOMA '10.