Dual-Mobility Cup Total Hip Arthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures: A Retrospective Study With a Median Follow-Up of 5 Years

Introduction: Patient outcomes following modern dual-mobility cup total hip arthroplasty (DM-THA) remains a concern. Few reports have focused on the use of modern DM-THA in the setting of Asian populations for displaced osteoporotic femoral neck fractures (FNFs). This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of Chinese population with displaced osteoporotic FNFs initially treated with modern DM-THA. Materials and Methods: Data from 112 consecutive patients (112 hips) with displaced osteoporotic FNFs initially treated with modern DM-THA during 2011-2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-ups were performed at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and then every 1 year after surgery. The primary endpoint was the Harris Hip Score (HHS); the secondary endpoint was the main orthopedic complication rate. Results: The mean HHS improved from 58.62 (±15.79) prior to surgery to 86.13 (±9.92) at the final follow-up. The main complication rate was 14.2% (16/112). Sixteen complications in 10 patients were recorded. Of the 16 complications, there were 2 (1.7%) cases requiring revision DM-THA, 3 (2.6%) cases of loosening, 2 (1.7%) cases of migration, 3 (2.6%) intra-prosthetic dislocation (IPD), 4 (3.5%) cases of tilting, and 2 (1.7%) cases of severe wear. The need for revision was attributed to prosthesis loosening associated with poor bony quality. Conclusion: In patients with displaced osteoporotic FNFs, DM-THA may yield favorable functional outcomes and a low rate of main orthopedic complications, in particular, a low dislocation rate.

[1]  Jun Zheng,et al.  Does total hip arthroplasty provide better outcomes than hemiarthroplasty for the femoral neck fracture? A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi.

[2]  T. Wright,et al.  No Difference in Force Required for Intraprosthetic Dislocation of Mixed Manufacturer vs Same Manufacturer Dual Mobility Articulations. , 2020, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  A. Kurmis CORR Insights®: Is Isolated Mobile Component Exchange an Option in the Management of Intraprosthetic Dislocation of a Dual Mobility Cup? , 2019, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  J. Béjui-Hugues,et al.  Is Isolated Mobile Component Exchange an Option in the Management of Intraprosthetic Dislocation of a Dual Mobility Cup? , 2019, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  T. Sculco,et al.  High Rate of Early Intraprosthetic Dislocations of Dual Mobility Implants: A Single Surgeon Series of Primary and Revision Total Hip Replacements. , 2019, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  A. Kamath,et al.  Total Hip Arthroplasty Outperforms Hemiarthroplasty in Patients Aged 65 Years and Older: A Propensity-Matched Study of Short-Term Outcomes , 2019, Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation.

[7]  J. Chouteau,et al.  Midterm Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Contemporary Monoblock Dual-Mobility Cup in Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty. , 2019, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  S. Lustig,et al.  Ten- to 16-Year Results of a Modern Cementless Dual-Mobility Acetabular Implant in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. , 2019, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  A. Helm,et al.  Outcomes for cemented dual mobility cup to treat recurrent instability; A UK case series. , 2019, Journal of orthopaedics.

[10]  L. V. van Steenbergen,et al.  Dual mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasties: trend over time in use, patient characteristics, and mid-term revision in 3,038 cases in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007–2016) , 2018, Acta orthopaedica.

[11]  Michael A Mont,et al.  Modern Dual-Mobility Cups in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2018, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  J. Geringer,et al.  Intraprosthetic dislocation of dual mobility total hip arthroplasty: still occurring? , 2018, International Orthopaedics.

[13]  M. Abdel Dual-Mobility Constructs in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties. , 2018, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  M. Pagnano,et al.  Otto Aufranc Award: Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA Reduced Dislocation, Rerevision, and Reoperation Compared With Large Femoral Heads , 2018, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  Michael A Mont,et al.  Mid-Term Outcomes of Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  G. Westrich,et al.  Utilizing Dual Mobility Components for First-Time Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Instability. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  R. D. de Steiger,et al.  Late Dislocations After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is the Bearing a Factor? , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[18]  R. Verdier,et al.  The evolution of outcomes and indications for the dual-mobility cup: a systematic review , 2017, International Orthopaedics.

[19]  F. D'Angelo,et al.  Factors Predisposing to Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors at 7 to 10 Years Follow-up. , 2016, Surgical technology international.

[20]  J. M. Christy,et al.  Dual-Mobility Articulations for Patients at High Risk for Dislocation. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[21]  B. Augereau,et al.  Do Dual-Mobility Cups Reduce the Risk of Dislocation in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Fractured Neck of Femur in Patients Aged Older Than 75 Years? , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  T. Sculco,et al.  Total Hip Arthroplasty Dislocations Are More Complex Than They Appear: A Case Report of Intraprosthetic Dislocation of an Anatomic Dual-Mobility Implant After Closed Reduction. , 2016, The Ochsner journal.

[23]  R. Bader,et al.  Intra-prosthetic dislocation of dual-mobility cups after total hip arthroplasty: potential causes from a clinical and biomechanical perspective , 2016, International Orthopaedics.

[24]  M. Innocenti,et al.  The use of a dual mobility cup in the management of recurrent dislocations of hip hemiarthroplasty , 2015, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[25]  Stephen A. Jones The Prevention and Treatment of Dislocation following Total Hip Arthroplasty: Efforts to Date and Future Strategies , 2015, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[26]  J. Béjui-Hugues,et al.  Can Dual Mobility Cups prevent Dislocation in All Situations After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty? , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[27]  R. Mohammed,et al.  Outcomes of dual-mobility acetabular cup for instability in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty , 2014, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[28]  J. Epinette,et al.  Are modern dual mobility cups a valuable option in reducing instability after primary hip arthroplasty, even in younger patients? , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[29]  P. Brooks Dislocation following total hip replacement: causes and cures. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[30]  A. Duhamel,et al.  Low Rate of Dislocation of Dual-mobility Cups in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  B. Boyer,et al.  Intraprosthetic Dislocation: A Specific Complication of the Dual-mobility System , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[32]  J. Hernigou,et al.  Ceramic-on-ceramic Bearing Decreases the Cumulative Long-term Risk of Dislocation , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[33]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized trials , 2012, International Orthopaedics.

[34]  L. Moretti,et al.  Alumina-on-alumina total hip replacement for femoral neck fracture in healthy patients , 2011, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[35]  H. Wingstrand,et al.  Dual mobility cup reduces dislocation rate after arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture , 2010, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[36]  W. Harmsen,et al.  Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[37]  B. Espehaug,et al.  Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxationA study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register , 2003, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.