Structure-activity relationship of 2,4-D correlates auxinic activity with the induction of somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana.

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a synthetic analogue of the plant hormone auxin that is commonly used in many in vitro plant regeneration systems, such as somatic embryogenesis (SE). Its effectiveness in inducing SE, compared to the natural auxin indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), has been attributed to the stress triggered by this compound rather than its auxinic activity. However, this hypothesis has never been thoroughly tested. Here we used a library of forty 2,4-D analogues to test the structure-activity relationship with respect to the capacity to induce SE and auxinic activity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Four analogues induced SE as effectively as 2,4-D and 13 analogues induced SE but were less effective. Based on root growth inhibition and auxin response reporter expression, the 2,4-D analogues were classified into different groups, ranging from very active to not active auxin analogues. A halogen at the 4-position of the aromatic ring was important for auxinic activity, whereas a halogen at the 3-position resulted in reduced activity. Moreover, a small substitution at the carboxylate chain was tolerated, as was extending the carboxylate chain with an even number of carbons. The auxinic activity of most 2,4-D analogues was consistent with their simulated TIR1-Aux/IAA coreceptor binding characteristics. A strong correlation was observed between SE induction efficiency and auxinic activity, which is in line with our observation that 2,4-D-induced SE and stress both require TIR1/AFB auxin co-receptor function. Our data indicate that the stress-related effects triggered by 2,4-D and considered important for SE induction are downstream of auxin signalling.

[1]  L. Yao,et al.  Dissecting C−H∙∙∙π and N−H∙∙∙π Interactions in Two Proteins Using a Combined Experimental and Computational Approach , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[2]  S. Royaert,et al.  Abnormalities in somatic embryogenesis caused by 2,4-D: an overview , 2019, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC).

[3]  M. Estelle,et al.  Genetic analysis of the Arabidopsis TIR1/AFB auxin receptors reveals both overlapping and specialized functions , 2019, bioRxiv.

[4]  Charo I. del Genio,et al.  The Tetrazole Analogue of the Auxin Indole-3-acetic Acid Binds Preferentially to TIR1 and Not AFB5. , 2018, ACS chemical biology.

[5]  K. Torii,et al.  Harnessing synthetic chemistry to probe and hijack auxin signaling. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[6]  M. Terrile,et al.  Regulation of SCFTIR1/AFBs E3 ligase assembly by S-nitrosylation of Arabidopsis SKP1-like1 impacts on auxin signaling , 2018, Redox biology.

[7]  Q. Ma,et al.  Auxin signaling: a big question to be addressed by small molecules , 2017, Journal of experimental botany.

[8]  O. Leyser Auxin Signaling1[OPEN] , 2017, Plant Physiology.

[9]  M. Bemer,et al.  A transcriptional view on somatic embryogenesis , 2017, Regeneration.

[10]  Matias D. Zurbriggen,et al.  Variation in auxin sensing guides AUX/IAA transcriptional repressor ubiquitylation and destruction , 2017, Nature Communications.

[11]  M. Strnad,et al.  2,4-D and IAA Amino Acid Conjugates Show Distinct Metabolism in Arabidopsis , 2016, PloS one.

[12]  Shui-gen Li,et al.  Application of Somatic Embryogenesis in Woody Plants. , 2016, Front. Plant Sci..

[13]  D. Riechers,et al.  2,4-D Past, Present, and Future: A Review , 2016, Weed Technology.

[14]  C. Simmerling,et al.  ff14SB: Improving the Accuracy of Protein Side Chain and Backbone Parameters from ff99SB. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[15]  C. De-la-Peña,et al.  Somatic Embryogenesis: Identified Factors that Lead to Embryogenic Repression. A Case of Species of the Same Genus , 2015, PloS one.

[16]  A. Fehér Somatic embryogenesis - Stress-induced remodeling of plant cell fate. , 2015, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[17]  T. Vernoux,et al.  Primers used in this study. , 2015 .

[18]  K. Nowak,et al.  ERF022 impacts the induction of somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis through the ethylene-related pathway , 2014, Planta.

[19]  C. Buell,et al.  Whole Transcriptome Profiling of Maize during Early Somatic Embryogenesis Reveals Altered Expression of Stress Factors and Embryogenesis-Related Genes , 2014, PloS one.

[20]  T. Kakimoto,et al.  Auxin sensitivities of all Arabidopsis Aux/IAAs for degradation in the presence of every TIR1/AFB. , 2014, Plant & cell physiology.

[21]  Yaling Song Insight into the mode of action of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) as an herbicide. , 2014, Journal of integrative plant biology.

[22]  Xiyan Yang,et al.  Comparative transcriptome analysis between somatic embryos (SEs) and zygotic embryos in cotton: evidence for stress response functions in SE development. , 2014, Plant biotechnology journal.

[23]  T. Hawkes,et al.  Defining Binding Efficiency and Specificity of Auxins for SCFTIR1/AFB-Aux/IAA Co-receptor Complex Formation , 2013, ACS chemical biology.

[24]  J. Friml,et al.  Defining the selectivity of processes along the auxin response chain: a study using auxin analogues. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[25]  Hyung-Taeg Cho,et al.  Auxin, the organizer of the hormonal/environmental signals for root hair growth , 2013, Front. Plant Sci..

[26]  B. Mueller‐Roeber,et al.  Extensive Modulation of the Transcription Factor Transcriptome during Somatic Embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2013, PloS one.

[27]  C. D. de Oliveira,et al.  A combinatorial TIR1/AFB-Aux/IAA co-receptor system for differential sensing of auxin , 2012, Nature chemical biology.

[28]  T. Bredow,et al.  Route to novel auxin: auxin chemical space toward biological correlation carriers. , 2010, Chemical reviews.

[29]  Guangfu Yang,et al.  The Role of Phe82 and Phe351 in Auxin-Induced Substrate Perception by TIR1 Ubiquitin Ligase: A Novel Insight from Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2010, PloS one.

[30]  Omid Karami,et al.  The molecular basis for stress-induced acquisition of somatic embryogenesis , 2009, Molecular Biology Reports.

[31]  J. Memelink,et al.  Auxin-induced, SCF(TIR1)-mediated poly-ubiquitination marks AUX/IAA proteins for degradation. , 2009, The Plant Journal.

[32]  Ken-ichiro Hayashi,et al.  Small-molecule agonists and antagonists of F-box protein–substrate interactions in auxin perception and signaling , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  R. Rose,et al.  The Transcription Factor MtSERF1 of the ERF Subfamily Identified by Transcriptional Profiling Is Required for Somatic Embryogenesis Induced by Auxin Plus Cytokinin in Medicago truncatula1[W][OA] , 2008, Plant Physiology.

[34]  E. Blancaflor,et al.  Auxin, actin and growth of the Arabidopsis thaliana primary root. , 2007, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[35]  Michal Sharon,et al.  Mechanism of auxin perception by the TIR1 ubiquitin ligase , 2007, Nature.

[36]  T. A. Walsh,et al.  Mutations in an Auxin Receptor Homolog AFB5 and in SGT1b Confer Resistance to Synthetic Picolinate Auxins and Not to 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid or Indole-3-Acetic Acid in Arabidopsis[W] , 2006, Plant Physiology.

[37]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[38]  Christopher I. Bayly,et al.  Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[39]  N. Baker,et al.  Imaging of photo-oxidative stress responses in leaves. , 2002, Journal of experimental botany.

[40]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. , 2001, Methods.

[41]  D. Weijers,et al.  The PINOID protein kinase regulates organ development in Arabidopsis by enhancing polar auxin transport. , 2001, Development.

[42]  A. Mallory,et al.  A viral suppressor of gene silencing in plants. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  G. Hagen,et al.  Aux/IAA proteins repress expression of reporter genes containing natural and highly active synthetic auxin response elements. , 1997, The Plant cell.

[44]  J. Guern,et al.  Comparison of mechanisms controlling uptake and accumulation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid, naphthalene-1-acetic acid, and indole-3-acetic acid in suspension-cultured tobacco cells , 1996, Planta.

[45]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[46]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[47]  F. Went,et al.  PHYTOHORMONES: STRUCTURE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY. I , 1938 .

[48]  M. Tahi,et al.  Comparing the Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Callus and Somatic Embryogenesis Induction in Four Elite Theobroma cacao L. Genotypes , 2017 .

[49]  R. Carbó-Dorca,et al.  Unrevealed structural requirements for auxin-like molecules by theoretical and experimental evidences. , 2007, Phytochemistry.

[50]  M. Gaj Direct somatic embryogenesis as a rapid and efficient system for in vitro regeneration of Arabidopsis thaliana , 2004, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture.

[51]  Gerard F. Katekar,et al.  Auxins: On the nature of the receptor site and molecular requirements for auxin activity , 1979 .