Live transference of surgical subspecialty skills using telerobotic proctoring to remote general surgeons.

BACKGROUND Certain clinical environments, including military field hospitals or rural medical centers, lack readily available surgical subspecialists. We hypothesized that telementoring by a surgical subspecialist using a robotic platform is feasible and can convey subspecialty knowledge and skill to a remotely located general surgeon. STUDY DESIGN Eight general surgery residents evaluated the effect of remote surgical telementoring by performing 3 operative procedures, first unproctored and then again when teleproctored by a surgical subspecialist. The clinical scenarios consisted of a penetrating right ventricular injury requiring suture repair, an open tibial fracture requiring external fixation, and a traumatic subdural hematoma requiring craniectomy. A robotic platform consisting of a pan-and-tilt camera with laser pointer attached to an overhead surgical light with integrated audio allowed surgical subspecialists the ability to remotely teleproctor residents. Performance was evaluated using an Operative Performance Scale. Satisfaction surveys were given after performing the scenario unproctored and again after proctoring. RESULTS Overall mean performance scores were superior in all scenarios when residents were proctored than when they were not (4.30 +/- 0.25 versus 2.43 +/- 0.20; p < 0.001). Mean performance scores for individual metrics, including tissue handling, instrument handling, speed of completion, and knowledge of anatomy, were all superior when residents were proctored (p < 0.001). Satisfaction surveys showed greater satisfaction and comfort among residents when proctored. Proctored residents believed the robotic platform facilitated learning and would be feasible if used clinically. CONCLUSIONS This study supports the use of surgical teleproctoring in guiding remote general surgeons by a surgical subspecialist in the care of a wounded patient in need of an emergency subspecialty operation.

[1]  Li-Ming Su,et al.  The RoboConsultant: telementoring and remote presence in the operating room during minimally invasive urologic surgeries using a novel mobile robotic interface. , 2007, Urology.

[2]  Ivar M Mendez,et al.  Robotic Long-distance Telementoring in Neurosurgery , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[3]  Richard M Satava,et al.  Robotics in colorectal surgery: telemonitoring and telerobotics. , 2006, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[4]  Pablo Garcia,et al.  Usability of robotic platforms for remote surgical teleproctoring. , 2009, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[5]  M. Anvari,et al.  The role of telementoring and telerobotic assistance in the provision of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in rural areas , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[6]  J. Doyle,et al.  A universal global rating scale for the evaluation of technical skills in the operating room. , 2007, American journal of surgery.

[7]  B Tulloh,et al.  Caseload in rural general surgical practice and implications for training , 2001, ANZ journal of surgery.

[8]  T. Randall Rural health care faces reform too; providers sow seeds for better future. , 1993, JAMA.

[9]  C. Boanca,et al.  Telementoring versus on-site mentoring in virtual reality-based surgical training , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[10]  J. Landercasper,et al.  Spectrum of general surgery in rural America. , 1997, Archives of surgery.

[11]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[12]  Dan Stoianovici,et al.  Technology Insight: telementoring and telesurgery in urology , 2006, Nature Clinical Practice Urology.

[13]  Melina C Vassiliou,et al.  A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. , 2005, American journal of surgery.

[14]  M. Whitcomb,et al.  Which medical schools produce rural physicians? , 1992, JAMA.