Social Media, Sociality, and Survey Research

Provides the knowledge and tools needed for the future of survey researchThe survey research discipline faces unprecedented challenges, such as falling response rates, inadequate sampling frames, and antiquated approaches and tools. Addressing this changing landscape,Social Media, Sociality, and Survey Researchintroduces readers to a multitude of new techniques in data collection in one of the fastest developing areas of survey research.The book is organized around the central idea of a "sociality hierarchy" in social media interactions, comprised of three levels: broadcast, conversational, and community based.Social Media, Sociality, and Survey Researchoffers balanced coverage of the theory and practice of traditional survey research, while providing a conceptual framework for the opportunities social media platforms allow. Demonstrating varying perspectives and approaches to working with social media, the book features:New ways to approach data collection using platforms such as Facebook and TwitterAlternate methods for reaching out to interview subjectsDesign features that encourage participation with engaging, interactive surveysSocial Media, Sociality, and Survey Researchis an important resource for survey researchers, market researchers, and practitioners who collect and analyze data in order to identify trends and draw reliable conclusions in the areas of business, sociology, psychology, and population studies. The book is also a useful text for upper-undergraduate and graduate-level courses on survey methodology and market research.

[1]  A. Fiske.  The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations. , 1992, Psychological review.

[2]  Sergio L. Toral Marín,et al.  An empirical study of the driving forces behind online communities , 2009, Internet Res..

[3]  Michael W. Link,et al.  A Comparison of Address-Based Sampling (ABS) Versus Random-Digit Dialing (RDD) for General Population Surveys , 2008 .

[4]  W. LaMendola.  Social Work and Social Presence in an Online World , 2010 .

[5]  Hugo Liu,et al.  Unraveling the Taste Fabric of Social Networks , 2006, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[6]  E. Mazur,et al.  Collecting data from social networking Web sites and blogs. , 2010 .

[7]  Y. Connie Yuan,et al.  Homophily of Network Ties and Bonding and Bridging Social Capital in Computer-Mediated Distributed Teams , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[8]  L. Coombs,et al.  USE OF TELEPHONE INTERVIEWS IN A LONGITUDINAL FERTILITY STUDY , 1964 .

[9]  Pavica Sheldon,et al.  The Relationship Between Unwillingness-to-Communicate and Students' Facebook Use , 2008, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[10]  C. B. Bhutta.  Not by the Book Facebook as a Sampling Frame , 2012 .

[11]  P. Anderson.  What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education , 2007 .

[12]  S. J. Sullivan,et al.  ‘What's happening?’ A content analysis of concussion-related traffic on Twitter , 2011, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[13]  C. Steeh,et al.  Are They Really as Bad as They Seem? Nonresponse Rates at the End of the Twentieth Century , 2001 .

[14]  Marietjie Schutte.  Social Software and Web 2.0 Technology Trends , 2009 .

[15]  J. Michael Brick,et al.  Address-Based Sampling for Subpopulation Surveys , 2011 .

[16]  J. Belsky,et al.  Child maltreatment: an ecological integration. , 1980, The American psychologist.

[17]  Peter R. Scott,et al.  Auditing Social Media: A Governance and Risk Guide , 2011 .

[18]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires: Comparisons of Respondent Satisficing and Social Desirability Response Bias , 2003 .

[19]  D. Yeager,et al.  Comparing the Accuracy of RDD Telephone Surveys and Internet Surveys Conducted with Probability and Non-Probability Samples , 2011 .

[20]  Dong-Hee Shin,et al.  Analysis of online social networks: a cross-national study , 2010, Online Inf. Rev..

[21]  Tom Smith.  Conference notes - The social media revolution , 2009 .

[22]  M. Couper.  A REVIEW OF ISSUES AND APPROACHES , 2000 .

[23]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  A framework for analyzing and understanding online communities , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[24]  H. Cole-Lewis,et al.  Text messaging as a tool for behavior change in disease prevention and management. , 2010, Epidemiologic reviews.

[25]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Survey research and societal change. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[26]  R. Groves.  Three Eras of Survey Research , 2011 .

[27]  Joseph Murphy,et al.  Does this Avatar Make Me Look Fat? Obesity and Interviewing in Second Life , 2009 .

[28]  J. Dijck,et al.  Facebook as a Tool for Producing Sociality and Connectivity , 2012 .

[29]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment , 2010, ICWSM.

[30]  S. Blumberg,et al.  Reevaluating the need for concern regarding noncoverage bias in landline surveys. , 2009, American journal of public health.

[31]  Scott Keeter,et al.  Presidential Address: Survey Research, Its New Frontiers, and Democracy , 2012 .

[32]  Stanley Presser,et al.  Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse over the Past Quarter Century , 2005 .

[33]  K. Glanz,et al.  An Ecological Perspective on Health Promotion Programs , 1988, Health education quarterly.

[34]  Joseph Murphy,et al.  The Effectiveness of Survey Recruitment Methods in Second Life , 2012 .

[35]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Collaborative Web Search: Who, What, Where, When, and Why , 2009, Collaborative Web Search: Who, What, Where, When, and Why.

[36]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  The Evolution of Online Social Networks: A tutorial survey , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[37]  Andrey Peytchev,et al.  Multiple Imputation for Unit Nonresponse and Measurement Error , 2012 .

[38]  P. Remington,et al.  New challenges for telephone survey research in the twenty-first century. , 2007, Annual review of public health.

[39]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Experiments in Producing Nonresponse Bias , 2006 .

[40]  Tiong-Thye Goh,et al.  Monitoring youth depression risk in Web 2.0 , 2009 .

[41]  Ronald E. Leenes.  Context Is Everything Sociality and Privacy in Online Social Network Sites , 2009, PrimeLife.

[42]  Jennie Wan Man Lai,et al.  Utilizing Facebook application for disaster relief: Social network analysis of American Red Cross cause joiners , 2010 .

[43]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[44]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth , 2009 .

[45]  M. Thelwall,et al.  Data mining emotion in social network communication: Gender differences in MySpace , 2010 .

[46]  David J. Roe,et al.  Changes in Response Rate Standards and Reports of Response Rate over the Past Decade , 2005 .

[47]  Karen L. Soderberg,et al.  Wireless substitution: state-level estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, January 2007-June 2010. , 2011, National health statistics reports.

[48]  M. Thelwall,et al.  Researching Personal Information on the Public Web , 2011 .

[49]  Brendan T. O'Connor,et al.  From Tweets to Polls: Linking Text Sentiment to Public Opinion Time Series , 2010, ICWSM.

[50]  Andrew Ravenscroft,et al.  Social software, Web 2.0 and learning: status and implications of an evolving paradigm , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[51]  Hugo Liu,et al.  Social Network Profiles as Taste Performances , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..