Phase II trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin in metastatic small-cell lung cancer: a Groupe Français de Pneumo-Cancérologie study.

PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of previously untreated patients with metastatic small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients were aged 18 to 75 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score < or = 2 and life expectancy > or = 12 weeks. Paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) was infused over 3 hours, before carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 6; Calvert formula) infused over 1 hour, once every 3 weeks for six cycles maximum. Prednisolone, dexchlorpheniramine, and ranitidine were standard premedication. Response to treatment was assessed every two cycles, and nonresponding patients were withdrawn from the trial to receive standard chemotherapy. RESULTS Of the 50 patients entering the study, 48 and 46 patients were assessable for toxicity and response, respectively. The overall response rate was 65%, with complete responses in three patients. Five patients had stable disease (11%) and 11 patients experienced progressive disease (24%). Median survival was 38 weeks, and median duration of response was 20 weeks. One-year survival was 22.5%. For a total of 232 cycles, grade 3 and 4 toxicity was 33% for neutropenia, 3.5% for thrombocytopenia, and 4% for anemia. Four patients had neutropenic fever (one toxic death). Nonhematologic toxicity was mainly grade 1 and 2 paresthesia (21% of patients); grade 3 myalgia/arthralgia was observed in 6.5% of patients. CONCLUSION First-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin in metastatic SCLC achieved a response rate and survival similar to standard regimens. With 1-day administration and a tolerable toxicity profile, this combination merits further investigation.

[1]  P. Papakosta,et al.  Paclitaxel (P) in combination with carboplatin (C) in the treatment of SCLC patients (a phase II study) , 2000 .

[2]  H. Groen,et al.  Paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer patients resistant to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide: a non-cross-resistant schedule. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  J. Hainsworth,et al.  Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule etoposide in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer: comparison of sequential phase II trials using different dose-intensities. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  P. Bunn Defining the role of paclitaxel in lung cancer: summary of recent studies and implications for future directions. , 1997, Seminars in oncology.

[5]  D. Ettinger,et al.  Phase II study of paclitaxel in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  S. Steinberg,et al.  Prospective randomized comparison of high-dose and standard-dose etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  K. Havemann,et al.  [Chemotherapy and combined chemoradiotherapy procedures in bronchial carcinoma]. , 1994, Der Internist.

[8]  D. Ettinger,et al.  Justification for evaluating new anticancer drugs in selected untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized study. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  J. Crawford,et al.  Randomized study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus etoposide and cisplatin versus alternation of these two regimens in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  K. Suemasu,et al.  Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus cisplatin and etoposide versus alternation of these regimens in small-cell lung cancer. , 1991, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  E Wiltshaw,et al.  Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  A. Miller,et al.  Reporting results of cancer treatment , 1981, Cancer.

[13]  Cockcroft Dw,et al.  Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum Creatinine , 1976 .