How, When, and Why to Use Digital Experimental Virtual Environments to Study Social Behavior

Over the last decade, researchers have begun using immersive virtual environment technology (IVET; commonly known as virtual reality) to create digital experimental virtual environments (DEVEs) to investigate social psychological processes. Researchers increasingly recognize that IVET provides powerful and cost-effective ways to manipulate theoretical variables and to measure a host of outcome variables, while providing a remarkable level of experimental control and ecological realism. In this article, we discuss IVET, the nature of social influence within DEVEs, and the use of DEVEs to study social behavior.

[1]  T. Brock,et al.  COMMUNICATOR-RECIPIENT SIMILARITY AND DECISION CHANGE. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Susan Persky,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environments Versus Traditional Platforms: Effects of Violent and Nonviolent Video Game Play , 2007 .

[3]  J. Blascovich,et al.  Proxemic behaviors as predictors of aggression towards Black (but not White) males in an immersive virtual environment , 2009 .

[4]  S. Milgram BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF OBEDIENCE. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[5]  N. Triplett,et al.  The Dynamogenic Factors in Pacemaking and Competition , 1898 .

[6]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[7]  Hideyuki Ando,et al.  Virtual acceleration with galvanic vestibular stimulation in a virtual reality environment , 2005, IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality, 2005..

[8]  P. Zimbardo,et al.  Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison , 1972 .

[9]  E. Hall The Silent Language , 1959 .

[10]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual Environments , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[11]  J. Loomis,et al.  Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[12]  Mel Slater,et al.  The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment , 2003, CHI '03.

[13]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Virtual Humans and Persuasion: The Effects of Agency and Behavioral Realism , 2007 .

[14]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  The self-protective and undermining effects of attributional ambiguity , 2007 .

[15]  Hiroo Iwata,et al.  Food simulator: a haptic interface for biting , 2004, IEEE Virtual Reality 2004.

[16]  Stacy Marsella,et al.  Building Interactive Virtual Humans for Training Environments , 2007 .

[17]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[18]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Digital Chameleons , 2005, Psychological science.

[19]  J. Blascovich Social influence within immersive virtual environments , 2002 .

[20]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Virtual Interpersonal Touch and Digital Chameleons , 2007 .

[21]  R. Sommer Studies in Personal space , 1959 .

[22]  Ivan E. Sutherland,et al.  The Ultimate Display , 1965 .

[23]  Cade McCall,et al.  What Can Virtual Reality Teach Us About Prosocial Tendencies in Real and Virtual Environments? , 2008 .

[24]  L. Hayduk Personal space: Where we now stand. , 1983 .

[25]  Chris Barker,et al.  An Experimental Study on Fear of Public Speaking Using a Virtual Environment , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[26]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  The Proteus Effect , 2009, Commun. Res..

[27]  Claude Ghaoui,et al.  Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction , 2005 .

[28]  Shinjiro Kawato,et al.  Projection based olfactory display with nose tracking , 2004, IEEE Virtual Reality 2004.

[29]  Chris Barker,et al.  An Experiment on Public Speaking Anxiety in Response to Three Different Types of Virtual Audience , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[30]  J. Bailenson,et al.  The Proteus Effect: The Effect of Transformed Self-Representation on Behavior , 2007 .

[31]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Social Inhibition in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[32]  R. Cialdini Influence: Science and Practice , 1984 .

[33]  D. Dutton,et al.  Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Owen Kelly,et al.  Psychosocial Stress Evoked by a Virtual Audience: Relation to Neuroendocrine Activity , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[35]  G. Fink,et al.  Being with virtual others: Neural correlates of social interaction , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Leila T. Worth,et al.  Processing of persuasive in-group messages. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[38]  J. Crocker,et al.  Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. , 1989 .

[39]  J. Loomis,et al.  Interpersonal Distance in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[40]  Leslie A. Hayduk,et al.  The shape of personal space: An experimental investigation. , 1981 .

[41]  Susan Persky,et al.  The Independent and Interactive Effects of Embodied-Agent Appearance and Behavior on Self-Report, Cognitive, and Behavioral Markers of Copresence in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.