Social science involvement in voir dire: Preliminary data on the effectiveness of “scientific jury selection”

The validity of what has been termed "scientific" or "systematic" jury selection (SJS) techniques is addressed using data from two actual cases; one criminal and one civil. Data from the highly publicized Joan Little trial indicated that where validity data were available for the survey approach and in-court rating of authoritarianism, these techniques measured what they purported to measure. Validation data were not available for a third technique--in-court rating of nonverbal communication. Data from the civil case indicated that the survey approach could successfully predict verdicts of mock jurors. It is concluded that while these data are suggestive of the validity of two of the techniques used in SJS, more rigorous tests are essential before conclusions can be drawn. Language: en

[1]  Lynn R. Kahle,et al.  Attitudes cause behaviors: A cross-lagged panel analysis. , 1979 .

[2]  Harry T. Reis,et al.  Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research. , 1977 .

[3]  J. Hepburn.  The objective reality of evidence and the utility of systematic jury selection , 1980 .

[4]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .

[5]  G. Bermant,et al.  The voir dire examination, juror challenges, and adversary advocacy , 1981 .

[6]  M. Zuckerman.  Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception , 1981 .

[7]  Audrey J. Noble,et al.  Authoritarianism and decisions of mock juries: Evidence of jury bias and group polarization. , 1978 .

[8]  R. Berk,et al.  The Vagaries and Vulgarities of "Scientific" Jury Selection , 1977 .

[9]  F. L. Bailey,et al.  Fundamentals of criminal advocacy , 1974 .

[10]  Bruce D. Sales,et al.  A Critical Evaluation of the Systematic Approach To Jury Selection , 1977 .

[11]  Jeffrey T. Frederick,et al.  The Uses of Social Science in Trials With Political and Racial Overtones: The Trial of Joan Little , 1977 .

[12]  B. Sales,et al.  The Trial: A Research Reviews , 1981 .

[13]  T. Adorno.  The Authoritarian Personality , 1950 .

[14]  G. Moran,et al.  Scientific juror selection: Sex as a moderator of demographic and personality predictors of impaneled felony juror behavior. , 1982 .

[15]  H. Zeisel,et al.  The Effect of Peremptory Challenges on Jury and Verdict: An Experiment in a Federal District Court , 1978 .

[16]  H. Zeisel,et al.  "Convincing Empirical Evidence" on the Six Member Jury , 1974 .