Effectiveness in top management group meetings: the role of goal clarity, focused communication, and learning behavior.

To explore the relationship between goal clarity, focused communication, learning behavior, and team effectiveness (i.e., task performance, relationship quality, and member satisfaction), self-report and observer data from eight top management groups that processed 56 agenda items during meetings were analyzed. We found that goal clarity and focused communication was positively related to team effectiveness. The effect of goal clarity on team effectiveness was partially mediated by focused communication. Speaking up when a goal was unclear increased focused communication, task performance and relationship quality. Speaking up when the discussion was off track was not related to task performance and member satisfaction, and was negatively related to relationship quality. These findings have implications for how to conduct an effective management meeting.

[1]  Jon R. Katzenbach.  Teams at the top : unleashing the potential of both teams and individual leaders , 1998 .

[2]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[3]  E. A. Locke,et al.  New Directions in Goal-Setting Theory , 2006 .

[4]  Katherine A. Karl,et al.  Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances , 2002 .

[5]  M. A. Campion,et al.  A control systems conceptualization of the goal-setting and changing process , 1982 .

[6]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  Conflict: An important dimension in successful management teams , 1995 .

[7]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[8]  G. Latham,et al.  New Directions in Goal-Setting , 2006 .

[9]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[10]  E. A. Locke,et al.  A theory of goal setting & task performance , 1990 .

[11]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change , 1993 .

[12]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Vincent S. Di Salvo,et al.  Theory and Practice , 1989 .

[14]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Harold Lazarus,et al.  Why is a third of your time wasted in meetings , 1997 .

[16]  Peter M. Tobia,et al.  Making the most of meeting time , 1990 .

[17]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared mental models in expert team decision making. , 1993 .

[18]  M. Sobel.  Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[19]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  TAMING INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT IN STRATEGIC CHOICE:HOW TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS ARGUE, BUT STILL GET ALONG , 1997 .

[20]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Meeting analysis: findings from research and practice , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[22]  Linda Myrsiades,et al.  Meeting sabotage: met and conquered , 2000 .

[23]  A. Edmondson.  Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[24]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Scaling the quality of teammates' mental models: equifinality and normative comparisons , 2005 .

[25]  Glenn E. Littlepage,et al.  Impact of meeting procedures on meeting effectiveness , 1992 .

[26]  F. Niederman,et al.  The Effects of Facilitator Characteristics on Meeting Preparation, Set Up, and Implementation , 1999 .

[27]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Massimo Marraffa,et al.  Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice , 1998 .

[29]  Dwight D. Frink,et al.  A Review of the Influence of Group Goals on Group Performance , 1994 .

[30]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  A dynamic model of top management team effectiveness: managing unstructured task streams , 2003 .

[31]  L. Weingart,et al.  Group goals and group performance , 1993 .

[32]  William B. Rouse,et al.  The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[33]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  To Your Heart's Content: A Model of Affective Diversity in Top Management Teams , 2000 .

[34]  Daan van Knippenberg,et al.  Work Motivation and Performance: A Social Identity Perspective , 2000 .

[35]  R. Peterson,et al.  Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .

[36]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[37]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Effects of controversy within a cooperative or competitive context on organizational decision making. , 1980 .