Gene Expression Analysis of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells Following Levitation in an Ultrasound Standing Wave Trap

In the present paper, gene expression analysis of mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells levitated in a novel ultrasound standing wave trap (USWT) (Bazou et al. 2005a) at variable acoustic pressures (0.08–0.85 MPa) and times (5–60 min) was performed. Our results showed that levitation of ES cells at the highest employed acoustic pressure for 60 min does not modify gene expression and cells maintain their pluripotency. Embryoid bodies (EBs) also expressed the early and late neural differentiation markers, which were also unaffected by the acoustic field. Our results suggest that the ultrasound trap microenvironment is minimally invasive as the biologic consequences of ES cell replication and EB differentiation proceed without significantly affecting gene expression. The technique holds great promise in safe cell manipulation techniques for a variety of applications including tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. (E-mail: Bazoud@tcd.ie)

[1]  M. Evans,et al.  Gene expression profiles during early differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells , 2009, BMC Developmental Biology.

[2]  P. Lonergan,et al.  Effect of culture environment on gene expression and developmental characteristics in IVF-derived embryos. , 2006, Theriogenology.

[3]  W L Nyborg,et al.  Biological effects of ultrasound: development of safety guidelines. Part I: personal histories. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  Nikolai Dechev,et al.  A novel permalloy based magnetic single cell micro array. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[5]  D. Gardner,et al.  Ex vivo early embryo development and effects on gene expression and imprinting. , 2005, Reproduction, fertility, and development.

[6]  Despina Bazou,et al.  Cell Adhesion Dynamics and Actin Cytoskeleton Reorganization in HepG2 Cell Aggregates , 2007, Cell communication & adhesion.

[7]  R. A. Miller.  Part Ii. General Review , 1861 .

[8]  Ilyas M. Khan,et al.  Gap junctional intercellular communication and cytoskeletal organization in chondrocytes in suspension in an ultrasound trap , 2006, Molecular membrane biology.

[9]  X. Chen,et al.  The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[10]  S. Jackson,et al.  Long-term viability and proliferation of alginate-encapsulated 3-D HepG2 aggregates formed in an ultrasound trap. , 2008, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[11]  Ling-Sheng Jang,et al.  Single-cell trapping utilizing negative dielectrophoretic quadrupole and microwell electrodes. , 2009, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[12]  Yu Sun,et al.  High-throughput cell manipulation using ultrasound fields , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  Despina Bazou,et al.  Physical enviroment of 2-D animal cell aggregates formed in a short pathlength ultrasound standing wave trap. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  Adrian Neild,et al.  Manipulation of micrometer sized particles within a micromachined fluidic device to form two-dimensional patterns using ultrasound. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Helen Anni,et al.  Effects of ethanol on mouse embryonic stem cells. , 2009, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[16]  F. Watt,et al.  The therapeutic potential of stem cells , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  F M Watt,et al.  Out of Eden: stem cells and their niches. , 2000, Science.

[18]  Francois Tremblay,et al.  Mutation of the calcium channel gene Cacna1f disrupts calcium signaling, synaptic transmission and cellular organization in mouse retina. , 2005, Human molecular genetics.

[19]  Hywel Morgan,et al.  Negative DEP traps for single cell immobilisation. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[20]  Todd C McDevitt,et al.  Engineering the embryoid body microenvironment to direct embryonic stem cell differentiation , 2009, Biotechnology progress.

[21]  W L Nyborg,et al.  Biological effects of ultrasound: development of safety guidelines. Part II: general review. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  Y. Barde,et al.  Generation of a defined and uniform population of CNS progenitors and neurons from mouse embryonic stem cells , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[23]  C. Bustamante,et al.  High-resolution dual-trap optical tweezers with differential detection: an introduction. , 2009, Cold Spring Harbor protocols.

[24]  Hitoshi Niwa,et al.  How is pluripotency determined and maintained? , 2007, Development.

[25]  Mingwen Ma,et al.  Functional three‐dimensional HepG2 aggregate cultures generated from an ultrasound trap: Comparison with HepG2 spheroids , 2007, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[26]  Despina Bazou,et al.  Molecular adhesion development in a neural cell monolayer forming in an ultrasound trap , 2005, Molecular membrane biology.

[27]  M. Berns,et al.  Manipulation of mammalian cells using a single-fiber optical microbeam. , 2008, Journal of biomedical optics.

[28]  Andrew M Wo,et al.  Trapping of bioparticles via microvortices in a microfluidic device for bioassay applications. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[29]  D. Gottlieb,et al.  Embryonic stem cells express neuronal properties in vitro. , 1995, Developmental biology.

[30]  Sean J. Morrison,et al.  Stem Cells and Niches: Mechanisms That Promote Stem Cell Maintenance throughout Life , 2008, Cell.

[31]  Thomas Laurell,et al.  Noninvasive acoustic cell trapping in a microfluidic perfusion system for online bioassays. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[32]  Deirdre R Meldrum,et al.  Easily fabricated magnetic traps for single-cell applications. , 2007, The Review of scientific instruments.

[33]  G. Foster,et al.  Cell-cell contact and membrane spreading in an ultrasound trap. , 2004, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.