Analysis of surgeon’s line of sight using an optical tracking system with a multifaceted marker device

PurposeVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a widely used technique where operating surgeons alternate between direct vision through minithoracotomy and monitor-aided vision as required. We analyzed surgeons’ line of sight to assess their proficiency at using an optical tracking system with a multifaceted marker device.MethodsAn infrared optical tracking system was developed that is capable of integrating information from a multifaceted marker device and analyzing three-dimensional (3D) dynamic movements including flexion and rotation. Using this system, we analyzed multiple aspects of surgeons’ head poses, thereby indirectly identifying their visual line of sight. A multifaceted device comprising 4 surfaces and 4 markers was constructed and attached to surgeons’ heads. The surgeons’ head motions were tracked using this multifaceted device and videotaped their face while they performed wedge resection. Both data sets were compared.ResultsThe system could document 98.5% of surgeons’ head motions, with a high correlation $${(\langle kappa\rangle= 0.935)}$$ between data acquired using the multifaceted device and video analysis. An inverse correlation was observed between tumor size and the monitor-viewing time ratio by surgeons in pulmonary wedge resection (R2 = 0.728).ConclusionAn optical tracking system with a multifaceted device was able to measure 3D dynamic movements of thoracic surgeons. The associated problems of reflection angle and marker shielding were solved. The utility of this device for analyzing surgeons’ visual line of sight during VATS was established.

[1]  Hiroshi Iseki,et al.  Image-guided neurosurgery system integrating AR-based navigation and open-MRI monitoring , 2005, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[2]  Fumio Miyazaki,et al.  The application of adaptive filters for motion prediction in visually tracked laparoscopic surgery , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO).

[3]  R. Flores,et al.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy (VATS), open thoracotomy, and the robot for lung cancer. , 2008, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  Fumio Miyazaki,et al.  FAce MOUSe: A novel human-machine interface for controlling the position of a laparoscope , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[5]  R. Andrade,et al.  Is VATS lobectomy better: perioperatively, biologically and oncologically? , 2010, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  Ray Vanderby,et al.  A Method to Measure Cervical Spine Motion Over Extended Periods of Time , 2007, Spine.

[7]  M. Mack,et al.  Lobectomy--video-assisted thoracic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy. A randomized trial. , 1995, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  B. Whitson,et al.  Surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy. , 2008, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  Fumio Miyazaki,et al.  How Does the Camera Assistant Decide the Zooming Ratio of Laparoscopic Images? Analysis and Implementation , 2008, MICCAI.

[10]  Daniel Kendoff,et al.  The role of navigation in knee surgery and evaluation of three-dimensional knee kinematics , 2005 .

[11]  Rohan J. Shah,et al.  In vitro assessment of image-guided otologic surgery: Submillimeter accuracy within the region of the temporal bone , 2005, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.