A Versatile Noise Performance Metric for Electrical Impedance Tomography Algorithms

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is an emerging technology for real-time monitoring of patients under mechanical ventilation. EIT has the potential to offer continuous medical monitoring while being noninvasive, radiation free, and low cost. Due to their ill-posedness, image reconstruction typically uses regularization, which implies a hyperparameter controlling the tradeoff between noise rejection and resolution or other accuracies. In order to compare reconstruction algorithms, it is common to choose hyperparameter values such that the reconstructed images have equal noise performance (NP), i.e., the amount of measurement noise reflected in the images. For EIT many methods have been suggested, but none work well when the data originate from different measurement setups, such as for different electrode positions or measurement patterns. To address this issue, we propose a new NP metric based on the average signal-to-noise ratio in the image domain. The approach is validated for EIT using simulation experiments on a human thorax model and measurements on a resistor phantom. Results show that the approach is robust to the measurement configuration (i.e., number and position of electrodes, skip pattern) and the reconstruction algorithm used. We propose this novel approach as a way to select optimized measurement configurations and algorithms.

[1]  Brian H. Brown,et al.  Medical impedance tomography and process impedance tomography: a brief review , 2001 .

[2]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  GREIT: a unified approach to 2D linear EIT reconstruction of lung images , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[3]  Andy Adler,et al.  Whither lung EIT: Where are we, where do we want to go and what do we need to get there? , 2012, Physiological measurement.

[4]  Andy Adler,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography: regularized imaging and contrast detection , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[5]  A Adler,et al.  Objective selection of hyperparameter for EIT , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[6]  D C Barber,et al.  Theoretical limits to sensitivity and resolution in impedance imaging. , 1987, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[7]  Steffen Leonhardt,et al.  Chest electrical impedance tomography examination, data analysis, terminology, clinical use and recommendations: consensus statement of the TRanslational EIT developmeNt stuDy group , 2016, Thorax.

[8]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter , 1979, Milestones in Matrix Computation.

[9]  Wei Wang,et al.  A comparison of methods for measurement of spatial resolution in two-dimensional circular EIT images. , 2002, Physiological measurement.

[10]  Martin Schweiger,et al.  Selection of regularization parameter for optical topography. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[11]  D. Djajaputra Electrical Impedance Tomography: Methods, History and Applications , 2005 .

[12]  P. Hansen Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems: Numerical Aspects of Linear Inversion , 1987 .

[13]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Propagation of measurement noise through backprojection reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Luis Tenorio,et al.  Statistical Regularization of Inverse Problems , 2001, SIAM Rev..

[15]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Regularization Tools version 4.0 for Matlab 7.3 , 2007, Numerical Algorithms.

[16]  G Hahn,et al.  Systematic errors of EIT systems determined by easily-scalable resistive phantoms , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[17]  Andy Adler,et al.  Using real data to train GREIT improves image quality , 2014 .

[18]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  Uses and abuses of EIDORS: an extensible software base for EIT , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[19]  William R B Lionheart EIT reconstruction algorithms: pitfalls, challenges and recent developments. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[20]  E. Neufeld,et al.  IT’IS Database for Thermal and Electromagnetic Parameters of Biological Tissues , 2012 .

[21]  Dianne P. O'Leary,et al.  The Use of the L-Curve in the Regularization of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems , 1993, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..