Head movements of children in MEG: Quantification, effects on source estimation, and compensation

Head movements during magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings may lead to inaccurate localization of brain activity. This can be particularly problematic for studies with children. We quantified head movements in 8- to 12-year-old children performing a cognitive task and examined how the movements affected source estimation. Each child was presented auditory word stimuli in five 4-min runs. The mean change in the MEG sensor locations during the experiment ranged from 3 to 26mm across subjects. The variation in the head position was largest in the up-down direction. The mean localization error in equivalent current dipole (ECD) simulations was 12mm for runs with the most head movement, with the frontal cortex appearing to be most prone to errors due to head movements. In addition, we examined the effect of head movements on two types of source estimates, ECDs and minimum-norm estimates (MNE), for an auditory evoked response. Application of a recently introduced signal space separation (SSS) method to compensate for the head movements was found to increase the goodness-of-fit of the ECDs, reduce the spatial confidence intervals of the ECDs, and enhance the peak amplitude in the MNE. These results are indicative of the SSS method being able to compensate for the spatial smoothing of the signals caused by head movements. Overall, the results suggest that MEG source estimates are relatively robust against head movements in children, and that confounds due to head movements can be successfully dealt with in MEG studies of developmental cognition.

[1]  W R Hamilton,et al.  Lectures on Quaternions: Contaning a Systematic Statement of a New Mathematical Method , 1853 .

[2]  S. Taulu,et al.  Applications of the signal space separation method , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  M. Hämäläinen,et al.  Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  D. Cohen.  Magnetoencephalography: Detection of the Brain's Electrical Activity with a Superconducting Magnetometer , 1972, Science.

[5]  H.-A. Wischmann,et al.  Coordinate system matching for neuromagnetic and morphological reconstruction overlay , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  A. van Oosterom,et al.  Source parameter estimation in inhomogeneous volume conductors of arbitrary shape , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Seppo P. Ahlfors,et al.  Magnetometer Position Indicator for Multichannel MEG , 1989 .

[8]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[9]  Martin Burghoff,et al.  Conversion of magnetocardiographic recordings between two different multichannel SQUID devices , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Eric Halgren,et al.  Magnetoencephalography ( Neuromagnetism ) , 2003 .

[11]  J. Nenonen,et al.  Transformation of multichannel magnetocardiographic signals to standard grid form , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  D. Cohen,et al.  MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain , 1990, Annals of neurology.

[13]  J. Sarvas.  Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Investigations of dipole localization accuracy in MEG using the bootstrap , 2005, NeuroImage.

[15]  S. Taulu,et al.  Presentation of electromagnetic multichannel data: The signal space separation method , 2005 .

[16]  H S Wilson.  Continuous head-localization and data correction in a whole-cortex MEG sensor. , 2004, Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN.

[17]  Ritva Paetau,et al.  Magnetoencephalography in pediatric neuroimaging , 2002 .

[18]  Toshiaki Imada,et al.  Magnetoencephalography is feasible for infant assessment of auditory discrimination , 2004, Experimental Neurology.

[19]  C. Phillips.  Electrophysiology in the study of developmental language impairments: Prospects and challenges for a top-down approach , 2005, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[20]  M. E. Spencer,et al.  A Study of Dipole Localization Accuracy for MEG and EEG using a Human Skull Phantom , 1998, NeuroImage.

[21]  Wilson Hs.  Continuous head-localization and data correction in a whole-cortex MEG sensor. , 2004 .

[22]  M. E. Spencer,et al.  A Study of Dipole Localization Accuracy for MEG and EEG using a Human Skull Phantom , 1998, NeuroImage.

[23]  K. Uutela,et al.  Detecting and Correcting for Head Movements in Neuromagnetic Measurements , 2001, NeuroImage.

[24]  J C de Munck,et al.  The use of an MEG device as 3D digitizer and motion monitoring system. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[26]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[27]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  Design and Operation of Stable rf‐Biased Superconducting Point‐Contact Quantum Devices, and a Note on the Properties of Perfectly Clean Metal Contacts , 1970 .

[28]  S. Supek,et al.  Simulation studies of multiple dipole neuromagnetic source localization: model order and limits of source resolution , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  Samuel J. Williamson,et al.  Advances in Biomagnetism , 1990, Springer US.

[30]  R. Hari,et al.  Spatial resolution of neuromagnetic records: theoretical calculations in a spherical model. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[31]  George Adelman,et al.  Encyclopedia of neuroscience , 2004 .

[32]  F. Incardona,et al.  Three‐dimensional localization system for small magnetic dipoles , 1992 .

[33]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[34]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[35]  Seppo P. Ahlfors,et al.  Effects of phonological contrast on auditory word discrimination in children with and without reading disability: A magnetoencephalography (MEG) study , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  E. Halgren,et al.  Head position in the MEG helmet affects the sensitivity to anterior sources. , 2004, Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN.

[37]  P. Teale,et al.  Auditory M100 component 1: relationship to Heschl's gyri. , 1994, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[38]  M. E. Spencer,et al.  Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[39]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[40]  Yoshio Okada,et al.  Somatosensory evoked potentials and magnetic fields elicited by tactile stimulation of the hand during active and quiet sleep in newborns , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[41]  B.N. Cuffin,et al.  Effects of head shape on EEGs and MEGs , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  M. Balish,et al.  Principles of Magnetoencephalography , 1991, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[43]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .