Separating Relational from Item Load Effects in Paired Recognition: Temporoparietal and Middle Frontal Gyral Activity with Increased Associates, but Not Items during Encoding and Retention

Working memory is affected by items stored and the relations between them. However, separating these factors has been difficult, because increased items usually accompany increased associations/relations. Hence, some have argued, relational effects are reducible to item effects. We overcome this problem by manipulating index length: the fewest number of item positions at which there is a unique item, or tuple of items (if length >1), for every instance in the relational (memory) set. Longer indexes imply greater similarity (number of shared items) between instances and higher load on encoding processes. Subjects were given lists of study pairs and asked to make a recognition judgement. The number of unique items and index length in the three list conditions were: (1) AB, CD: four/one; (2) AB, CD, EF: six/one; and (3) AB, AD, CB: four/two, respectively. Japanese letters were used in Experiments 1 (kanji-ideograms) and 2 (hiragana-phonograms); numbers in Experiment 3; and shapes generated from Fourier descriptors in Experiment 4. Across all materials, right dominant temporoparietal and middle frontal gyral activity was found with increased index length, but not items during study. In Experiment 5, a longer delay was used to isolate retention effects in the absence of visual stimuli. Increased left hemispheric activity was observed in the precuneus, middle frontal gyrus, and superior temporal gyrus with increased index length for the delay period. These results show that relational load is not reducible to item load.

[1]  G. Halford Children's Understanding: The Development of Mental Models , 1993 .

[2]  M. Manosevitz High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory , .

[3]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Neural Correlates of Memory Retrieval during Recognition Memory and Cued Recall , 1998, NeuroImage.

[4]  E E Smith,et al.  Components of verbal working memory: evidence from neuroimaging. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Aging and reflective processes of working memory: binding and test load deficits. , 2000 .

[6]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[7]  M. Rugg,et al.  Retrieval processing and episodic memory , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Ralph Roskies,et al.  Fourier Descriptors for Plane Closed Curves , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[9]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  The frontopolar cortex and human cognition: Evidence for a rostrocaudal hierarchical organization within the human prefrontal cortex , 2000, Psychobiology.

[10]  Albert Postma,et al.  Spatial working memory performance after high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left and right posterior parietal cortex in humans , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[11]  G. Halford,et al.  A cognitive complexity metric applied to cognitive development , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  J. Francis Statistica for Windows , 1995 .

[13]  P. Roland,et al.  Right prefrontal activation during encoding, but not during retrieval, in a non-verbal paired-associates task. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  A. Cowey,et al.  The role of the parietal cortex in visual attention—hemispheric asymmetries and the effects of learning: a magnetic stimulation study , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 1995 .

[16]  S. Phillips,et al.  Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. , 1998, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[17]  R. Dolan,et al.  The Role of the Right Anterior Prefrontal Cortex in Episodic Retrieval , 2000, NeuroImage.

[18]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task , 1997, Nature.

[19]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  Steven Phillips Measuring relational complexity in oddity discrimination tasks , 1997 .

[21]  J D Gabrieli,et al.  Neural substrates of mathematical reasoning: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of neocortical activation during performance of the necessary arithmetic operations test. , 2001, Neuropsychology.

[22]  E. Tulving,et al.  PET studies of encoding and retrieval: The HERA model , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  C D Frith,et al.  The functional roles of prefrontal cortex in episodic memory. II. Retrieval. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  R. Klein,et al.  A review of the evidence for a disengage deficit following parietal lobe damage , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[25]  T. Shallice,et al.  The functional roles of prefrontal cortex in episodic memory. I. Encoding. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Does frontal lobe activation during retrieval reflect complexity of retrieved information? , 2000, Neuroreport.

[27]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Susceptibility to Memory Interference Effects following Frontal Lobe Damage: Findings from Tests of Paired-Associate Learning , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Relational Processing and the Prefrontal Cortex 1 Prefrontal Cortex Involvement in Relational Processing during Reasoning , 2001 .

[29]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[30]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The role of working memory in analogical mapping , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[31]  F. Craik,et al.  The Effect of Divided Attention on Encoding and Retrieval in Episodic Memory Revealed by Positron Emission Tomography , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Henrik Walter,et al.  Dissociating a Common Working Memory Network from Different Neural Substrates of Phonological and Spatial Stimulus Processing , 2002, NeuroImage.

[33]  J. Jonides,et al.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multisubject fMRI Studies and Conjunction Analyses , 1999, NeuroImage.

[35]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[36]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How Many Subjects Constitute a Study? , 1999, NeuroImage.

[37]  K. Holyoak,et al.  A System for Relational Reasoning in Human Prefrontal Cortex , 1999 .

[38]  J. Boccio,et al.  Computer program manual , 1972 .

[39]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates , 1991, Nature.

[40]  G. Halford Can young children integrate premises in transitivity and serial order tasks? , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  Terry Halpin,et al.  Conceptual Schema and Relational Database Design , 1995 .

[42]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  Processing capacity limits are not explained by storage limits , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[43]  G. Halford,et al.  A category theory approach to cognitive development , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[44]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial Attention Shifts and Visual Feature Conjunction , 1995, Science.

[45]  D J Mewhort,et al.  The extralist-feature effect: evidence against item matching in short-term recognition memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[46]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  J. Desmond,et al.  Load-Dependent Roles of Frontal Brain Regions in the Maintenance of Working Memory , 1999, NeuroImage.

[48]  K A Ericcson,et al.  Acquisition of a memory skill. , 1980, Science.

[49]  James K. Kroger,et al.  Rostrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Involvement in Relational Integration during Reasoning , 2001, NeuroImage.

[50]  Terry Halpin Conceptual schema and relational database design (2nd ed.) , 1996 .

[51]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  fMRI evidence of age-related hippocampal dysfunction in feature binding in working memory. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[52]  S. Phillips,et al.  What Changes in Children's Drawing Procedures? Relational Complexity as a Constraint on Representational Redescription , 1998 .

[53]  A. Baddeley The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  Children's ability to make transitive inferences: The importance of premise integration and structural complexity , 1998 .

[55]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[56]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  The processing of associations versus the processing of relations and symbols: A systematic comparison , 1995 .

[57]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  The Role of the Prefrontal Cortex in Recognition Memory and Memory for Source: An fMRI Study , 1999, NeuroImage.

[58]  J. Bain,et al.  Information-Processing Demands of Transitive Inference , 1986 .

[59]  Robert W. Thatcher,et al.  Maturation of the human frontal lobes: Physiological evidence for staging , 1991 .

[60]  J. Desmond,et al.  Neural Substrates of Fluid Reasoning: An fMRI Study of Neocortical Activation during Performance of the Raven's Progressive Matrices Test , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[61]  J. D. E. Gabrieli,et al.  Integration of diverse information in working memory within the frontal lobe , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[62]  S. Phillips,et al.  Relational complexity metric is effective when assessments are based on actual cognitive processes , 1998 .

[63]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[64]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Does parietal cortex contribute to feature binding? , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[65]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[66]  J L Lancaster,et al.  Automated Talairach Atlas labels for functional brain mapping , 2000, Human brain mapping.