Bruised poultry tissue as a possible source of staphylococcal infection.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Bacteriological analyses were made on 45 swab samples secured from hands of poultry workers on processing line, on 31 bruised and 15 normal poultry tissue samples, and on 15 swabs obtained from infected lacerations and exudates of abcesses on hands, arms, chest, and abdomen of poultry workers. A total of 170 Staphylococcus cultures were isolated from samples examined. These cultures were characterized morphologically and biochemically and then grouped into six distinct patterns. S. aureus was found in 86.6% of swab samples obtained from infected workers, in 40% of swabs from hands of workers who handle bruised birds, and in 38.7% of bruised tissues, and was absent from all samples obtained from hands of workers who do not handle bruised birds. All the coagulase-positive staphylococcal isolates were bacteriophage-typed, and the results showed that the same phage-type S. aureus was found in many poultry bruises and in infected lesions of poultry workers as well as on hands of workers who handle bruised birds. These results indicate that poultry bruises are a source of staphylococcal infection encountered among poultry workers.
[1] J. Hawiger. Frequency of staphylococcal lysozyme production tested by plate method , 1968, Journal of clinical pathology.
[2] M. Hamdy,et al. Escherichia coli in Normal and Traumatized Tissues.∗ † , 1966, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.
[3] J. M. Jay. Production of Lysozyme by Staphylococci and Its Correlation with Three Other Extracellular Substances , 1966, Journal of bacteriology.