Flexible valency in Chintang

Chintang [ˈts̻ ̻h iɳʈaŋ] (ISO639.3: ctn) is a Sino-Tibetan language of Nepal. It is named aer the village where it is mainly spoken. e village lies in the hills of Eastern Nepal, bigger cities within day’s reach being Dhankuṭā and Dharān. ere are no official data on the number of speakers, but we estimate there to be around 4,000 5,000 speakers. Most speakers are bior trilingual, with Nepali (the Indo-Aryan lingua franca of Nepal) as one and Bantawa (a related Sino-Tibetan language) as the other additional language. Monolingual speakers are still to be found mainly among elderly women, whereas a considerable portion of the younger generation is rapidly shiing to Nepali. Genealogically, Chintang belongs to the Kiranti group. e Kiranti languages are generally accepted to belong to the large Sino-Tibetan (or Tibeto-Burman) family, although their position within this family is controversial (cf. e.g. urgood 2003, Ebert 2003). Based on phonological evidence, Chintang belongs to the Eastern subgroup of Kiranti (Bickel et al. 2010). ere are two major dialects (Mulgaũ and Sambugaũ) named aer the areas where they are spoken. e differences between them concernmorphology and the lexicon but, as far as we know, not syntax, and so we will not distinguish between dialects in this chapter. For all examples the source has been marked behind the translation. Wherever possible, we take data from the Chintang Language Corpus (Bickel et al. 2011), limiting ourselves to uerances by fully fluent adults.1

[1]  David R. Dowty Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[2]  Balthasar Bickel,et al.  The syntax of three-argument verbs in Chintang and Belhare (Southeastern Kiranti) , 2010 .

[3]  John W. Du Bois Discourse and Grammar , 2014 .

[4]  Balthasar Bickel,et al.  Referential Density in Discourse and Syntactic Typology , 2003 .

[5]  B. Bickel,et al.  The possessive of experience in Belhare , 1997 .

[6]  Graham Thurgood,et al.  A Subgrouping of the Sino-Tibetan Languages: The Interaction Between Language Contact, Change, and Inheritance , 2002 .

[7]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[8]  Multivariate typology and field linguistics: a case study on detransitivization in Kiranti (Sino-Tibetan) , 2011 .

[9]  Netra P. Paudyal,et al.  Free Prefix Ordering in Chintang , 2007 .

[10]  B. Michailovsky Tibeto-Burman Dental Suffixes: Evidence from Limbu (Nepal) , 1984 .

[11]  Balthasar Bickel,et al.  Nouns and verbs in Chintang: children's usage and surrounding adult speech* , 2011, Journal of Child Language.

[12]  Andrej Malchukov,et al.  Ditransitive constructions: a typological overview , 2010 .

[13]  A. Malchukov Split intransitives, experiencer objects and 'transimpersonal' constructions: (re-) establishing the connection , 2005 .

[14]  George van Driem,et al.  A grammar of Dumi , 1993 .

[15]  Balthasar Bickel,et al.  Two Ways of Suspending Object Agreement in Puma: Between Incorporation, Antipassivization, and Optional Agreement , 2014 .