A discussion of Prathap's h2-index for institutional evaluation with an application in the field of HIV infection and therapy

[1]  J. R. Cole,et al.  The Ortega Hypothesis , 1972, Science.

[2]  D. Chubin,et al.  Another appraisal of Ortega, the Coles, and science policy: the Ecclesiastes hypothesis , 1976 .

[3]  H. Hoerman,et al.  Secondary and Tertiary Citing: A Study of Referencing Behavior in the Literature of Citation Analysis Deriving from the Ortega Hypothesis of Cole and Cole , 1995, The Library Quarterly.

[4]  Francis Narin,et al.  To believe or not to believe , 1987, Scientometrics.

[5]  Stephen Cole,et al.  Testing the Ortega hypothesis: Milestone or millstone? , 1987, Scientometrics.

[6]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[7]  Yang Li-ying,et al.  Bibliometrical Analysis of Paper's Co-occurrence in Main International Institutions&mdash|A Case Study in Chemical Research , 2006 .

[8]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  On the Opportunities and Limitations of the H-index , 2006 .

[9]  L. Egghe.  An improvement of the h-index: the g-index , 2006 .

[10]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Modelling successive h-indices , 2008, Scientometrics.

[11]  R. Rousseau,et al.  The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index , 2007 .

[12]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  Rational (successive) h-indices: An application to economics in the Republic of Ireland , 2008, Scientometrics.

[13]  A. Kinney.  National scientific facilities and their science impact on nonbiomedical research , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Jean-François Molinari,et al.  A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions , 2008, Scientometrics.

[15]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Influence of individual researchers’ visibility on institutional impact: an example of Prathap’s approach to successive h-indices , 2009, Scientometrics.

[16]  András Schubert,et al.  Successive h-indices , 2007, Scientometrics.

[17]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  R. Rousseau,et al.  Reflections on recent developments of the h-index and h-type indices , 2008 .

[20]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Journal of Informetrics -index , 2022 .

[21]  Ricardo Arencibia Jorge,et al.  Applying successive H indices in the institutional evaluation: A case study , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  L. Egghe,et al.  Study of different h-indices for groups of authors , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  A modification of the h-index: The hm-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[24]  Gerhard J. Woeginger,et al.  An axiomatic characterization of the Hirsch-index , 2008, Math. Soc. Sci..

[25]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Real and rational variants of the h-index and the g-index , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[26]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Properties of Hirsch-type indices: the case of library classification categories , 2009, Scientometrics.

[27]  Leo Egghe,et al.  The Hirsch index and related impact measures , 2010, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  In those fields where multiple authorship is the rule, the h-index should be supplemented by role-based h-indices , 2010, J. Inf. Sci..