Analysis of attachment models for directory and file trees

Abstract Many networks emerge as the outcome of a collective interaction, such as the World Wide Web (WWW); others are the consequence of the biological evolution, such as the brain. In contrast to these examples, we investigate the topology of trees generated by single individuals. Computer users generate directory structures to store and manage information in files. Analyzing the directory and file trees generated by different users we have access to different realizations available for statistical analysis. We characterize the architecture of directories and files created by different computer users by means of the degree distributions and number of leaves, degree–degree correlations, average distance to root, and community size distributions. We compare the different topologies in the search for similar managing patterns, and compare the trees obtained with two simple models of growing networks and with a model that interpolates between them and incorporates the heterogeneity of the computer users.

[1]  Mark G. Tjoelker,et al.  Universal scaling of respiratory metabolism, size and nitrogen in plants , 2006, Nature.

[2]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2002, Science.

[3]  G. Caldarelli,et al.  The fractal properties of Internet , 2000, cond-mat/0009178.

[4]  Katy Börner,et al.  Mapping knowledge domains , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Evolution of networks , 2001, cond-mat/0106144.

[6]  Claudio Castellano,et al.  Defining and identifying communities in networks. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Amos Maritan,et al.  Size and form in efficient transportation networks , 1999, Nature.

[8]  R. Ferrer i Cancho,et al.  Scale-free networks from optimal design , 2002, cond-mat/0204344.

[9]  A. Arenas,et al.  Community analysis in social networks , 2004 .

[10]  Maritan,et al.  Scaling laws for river networks. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[11]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  R. Solé,et al.  Optimization in Complex Networks , 2001, cond-mat/0111222.

[13]  S. Strogatz.  Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[14]  Víctor M Eguíluz,et al.  Scaling in the structure of directory trees in a computer cluster. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[15]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[16]  M. Newman,et al.  Origin of degree correlations in the Internet and other networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  Supply–demand balance and metabolic scaling , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Kasper Astrup Eriksen,et al.  Scale-free growing networks imply linear preferential attachment. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[20]  M. Newman,et al.  Mixing patterns in networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  R. Solé,et al.  Selection, Tinkering, and Emergence in Complex Networks - Crossing the Land of Tinkering , 2002 .

[22]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  Accessibility of information on the Web , 2000, INTL.

[23]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[24]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Self-organized fractal river networks. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[25]  A. Arenas,et al.  Food-web topology: Universal scaling in food-web structure? , 2005, Nature.

[26]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self-Organization , 1997 .

[27]  S. Redner,et al.  Organization of growing random networks. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  A Díaz-Guilera,et al.  Self-similar community structure in a network of human interactions. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Universal scaling relations in food webs , 2003, Nature.

[31]  James H. Brown,et al.  The fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms. , 1999, Science.

[32]  Christopher R. Myers,et al.  Software systems as complex networks: structure, function, and evolvability of software collaboration graphs , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  K Sneppen,et al.  Navigating networks with limited information. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[34]  D. ben-Avraham,et al.  Kleinberg navigation in fractal small-world networks. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[35]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Navigation in a small world , 2000, Nature.

[36]  James H. Brown,et al.  A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology , 1997, Science.

[37]  M E J Newman.  Assortative mixing in networks. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[38]  F. Jacob,et al.  Evolution and tinkering. , 1977, Science.

[39]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Food-web topology: Universal scaling in food-web structure? (reply) , 2005, Nature.