Texas LPG fire: Domino effects triggered by natural hazards

Abstract On February 2007, a massive fire in a propane de-asphalting unit in an oil refinery in Texas, USA happened due to liquid propane release from a cracked pipe in a control station injuring four people, damaging extensive equipment, causing significant business interruption, and resulting in more than $50 million losses. The accident was triggered by a natural hazard: freezing of piping at a control station caused an inlet pipe elbow to crack, which in turn, led to the release of high-pressure liquid propane which was rapidly ignited. In addition, there were two near-miss events due to potential domino effects. In fact, the accident could reasonably have resulted in much more severe consequences due to the exposure of large butane storage spheres and chlorine containers, increasing the possibility of a catastrophic domino effect. This paper develops a Natech (natural hazard triggering technological disasters) risk assessment methodology that relies upon Bayesian network capabilities and takes into account the potential Natech domino effects. The methodology is implemented in the intended refinery and mathematically graphically represents the dynamic cause–effect relations between units involved in the scenario, and handles uncertainties among the interactions. In addition, the methodology can provide a risk value for the entire scenario that can be used further for risk-based decision making.

[1]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis. , 2005, Journal of hazardous materials.

[2]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Domino Effect Analysis Using Bayesian Networks , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  Jie Lu,et al.  An intelligent situation awareness support system for safety-critical environments , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[4]  Richard E. Neapolitan,et al.  Learning Bayesian networks , 2007, KDD '07.

[5]  K. N. Fleming,et al.  Database development and uncertainty treatment for estimating pipe failure rates and rupture frequencies , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Escalation thresholds in the assessment of domino accidental events. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[7]  Valérie Laforest,et al.  Development of generic bow-tie diagrams of accidental scenarios triggered by flooding of industrial facilities (Natech) , 2015 .

[8]  E. Krausmann,et al.  Natech risk reduction in the European Union , 2012 .

[9]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Quantitative assessment of risk due to major accidents triggered by lightning , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Domino effects in the process industries : modelling, prevention and managing , 2013 .

[11]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Quantitative assessment of domino and NaTech scenarios in complex industrial areas , 2014 .

[12]  Elisabeth Krausmann,et al.  RAPID-N: Rapid natech risk assessment and mapping framework , 2013 .

[13]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Industrial accidents triggered by lightning. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[14]  Elsa Pastor,et al.  Assessing the consequences of pipeline accidents to support land-use planning , 2017 .

[15]  Wiktor Frid,et al.  Identification of sensitivities in Bayesian networks , 2004, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[16]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Release of hazardous substances in flood events: Damage model for horizontal cylindrical vessels , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Vulnerability of industrial plants to flood-induced natechs: A Bayesian network approach , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Behdad Moghtaderi,et al.  Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries , 2016 .

[19]  Elisabeth Krausmann,et al.  Historical analysis of U.S. onshore hazardous liquid pipeline accidents triggered by natural hazards , 2016 .

[20]  Guangquan Zhang,et al.  The explosion at institute: modeling and analyzing the situation awareness factor. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Development of a framework for the risk assessment of Na-Tech accidental events , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  A model for process equipment damage probability assessment due to lightning , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Toshimasa Ohara,et al.  Atmospheric behavior, deposition, and budget of radioactive materials from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in March 2011 , 2011 .

[24]  Norio Okada,et al.  Consideration of natural hazards in the design and risk management of industrial facilities , 2008 .

[25]  Rafael Rumí,et al.  Bayesian networks in environmental modelling , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[26]  Laura J. Steinberg,et al.  When Natural and Technological Disasters Collide: Lessons from the Turkey Earthquake of August 17, 1999 , 2004 .

[27]  Ccps Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis , 1999 .

[28]  T. Ohara Atmospheric Behavior, Deposition, and Budget of Radioactive Materials from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant , 2013 .

[29]  Ernesto Salzano,et al.  Industrial accidents triggered by natural hazards: an emerging risk issue , 2011 .

[30]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Introducing External Hazard Factors in Quantitative Risk Analysis , 2012 .

[31]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Extending the quantitative assessment of industrial risks to earthquake effects. , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[32]  Ernesto Salzano,et al.  Seismic damage to pipelines in the framework of Na-Tech risk assessment , 2015 .