LCA-based environmental assessment of the use and maintenance of heating and ventilation systems in Dutch dwellings

Abstract Buildings contribute significantly to the human-induced environmental burden. This comes not only from construction and demolition but also from activities throughout the operational phase – building maintenance and energy use for climate control. This paper describes how life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology can be applied to quantitatively assess the environmental performance of the use and maintenance of heating and ventilation systems. The studied climate systems include individual non-condensing boilers, condensing boilers and heat pumps on exhaust air for heating and hot tap water combined with either collective mechanical exhaust ventilation or individual balanced ventilation with heat recovery. This study shows that a heat pump causes the highest environmental burden of all the assessed climate systems due to the electricity needed for operation, high material content of the system and the refrigerant used. If the electricity used by the heat pump is generated fully by local photovoltaic cells, environmental performance will improve, but not for all environmental impact categories. Climate systems that reduce energy demand for heating, such as ventilation with heat recovery, will reduce the environmental impact related to energy use for space heating. However, if the electricity used to operate the system increases, along with the material content of the systems and distribution networks, other environmental impact categories than those related to space heating will also increase. Finally, maintenance frequency and related transportation of maintenance workers have a marginal effect on total environmental impact.

[1]  Matjaz Prek,et al.  Environmental impact and life cycle assessment of heating and air conditioning systems, a simplified case study , 2004 .

[2]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Analysing the life-cycle energy of an Australian residential building and its householders , 2000 .

[3]  Nick Kelly,et al.  A comparative assessment of future heat and power sources for the UK domestic sector , 2006 .

[4]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  LCA normalisation factors for the Netherlands, Western Europe and the World , 2001 .

[5]  Radu Zmeureanu,et al.  Comparison of environmental impacts of two residential heating systems , 2008 .

[6]  Jeroen B. Guinee,et al.  Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards , 2002 .

[7]  Robert Ries,et al.  Life cycle assessment of residential heating and cooling systems in four regions in the United States , 2008 .

[8]  Ad van Wijk,et al.  Heat supply in the netherlands: A systems analysis of costs, exergy efficiency, CO2 and NOx emissions , 1997 .

[9]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[10]  Roland Clift,et al.  The relative importance of transport in determining an appropriate sustainability strategy for food sourcing , 2006 .

[11]  G. Psacharopoulos.  Overview and methodology , 1991 .

[12]  M. Goedkoop,et al.  The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[13]  Elzenga He,et al.  Referentieramingen energie en emissies 2005 -2020 , 2005 .

[14]  Laan van Westenenk,et al.  Improvement of LCA characterization factors and LCA practice for metals , 2004 .

[15]  C. Simonson,et al.  Life cycle assessment of residential ventilation units in a cold climate , 2005 .

[16]  María D. Bovea,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment of commonly used refrigerants in commercial refrigeration systems , 2007 .

[17]  Sevastianos Mirasgedis,et al.  European residential buildings and empirical assessment of the Hellenic building stock, energy consumption, emissions and potential energy savings , 2007 .