Application of Physically-Based Slope Correction for Maximum Forest Canopy Height Estimation Using Waveform Lidar across Different Footprint Sizes and Locations: Tests on LVIS and GLAS

Forest canopy height is an important biophysical variable for quantifying carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems. Active light detection and ranging (lidar) sensors with discrete-return or waveform lidar have produced reliable measures of forest canopy height. However, rigorous procedures are required for an accurate estimation, especially when using waveform lidar, since backscattered signals are likely distorted by topographic conditions within the footprint. Based on extracted waveform parameters, we explore how well a physical slope correction approach performs across different footprint sizes and study sites. The data are derived from airborne (Laser Vegetation Imaging Sensor; LVIS) and spaceborne (Geoscience Laser Altimeter System; GLAS) lidar campaigns. Comparisons against field measurements show that LVIS data can satisfactorily provide a proxy for maximum forest canopy heights (n = 705, RMSE = 4.99 m, and R2 = 0.78), and the simple slope correction grants slight accuracy advancement in the LVIS canopy height retrieval (RMSE of 0.39 m improved). In the same vein of the LVIS with relatively smaller footprint size (~20 m), substantial progress resulted from the physically-based correction for the GLAS (footprint size = ~50 m). When compared against reference LVIS data, RMSE and R2 for the GLAS metrics (n = 527) are improved from 12.74–7.83 m and from 0.54–0.63, respectively. RMSE of 5.32 m and R2 of 0.80 are finally achieved without 38 outliers (n = 489). From this study, we found that both LVIS and GLAS lidar campaigns could be benefited from the physical correction approach, and the magnitude of accuracy improvement was determined by footprint size and terrain slope.

[1]  R. Nelson,et al.  Determining forest canopy characteristics using airborne laser data , 1984 .

[2]  T. Carlson,et al.  On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index , 1997 .

[3]  M. Dobson,et al.  The use of Imaging radars for ecological applications : A review , 1997 .

[4]  Karin S. Fassnacht,et al.  Relationships between leaf area index and Landsat TM spectral vegetation indices across three temperate zone sites , 1999 .

[5]  J. Blair,et al.  Modeling laser altimeter return waveforms over complex vegetation using high‐resolution elevation data , 1999 .

[6]  G. Mroz,et al.  Microclimate in Forest Ecosystem and Landscape Ecology , 1999 .

[7]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Forestry , 2000, Journal of Forestry.

[8]  K. Holmesa,et al.  Error in a USGS 30-meter digital elevation model and its impact on terrain modeling , 2000 .

[9]  C. Tucker,et al.  A large carbon sink in the woody biomass of Northern forests , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Estimation of tropical forest structural characteristics using large-footprint lidar , 2002 .

[11]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Sensitivity of large-footprint lidar to canopy structure and biomass in a neotropical rainforest , 2002 .

[12]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies , 2002 .

[13]  Michael J. Oimoen,et al.  The National Elevation Dataset , 2002 .

[14]  S. Running,et al.  Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data , 2002 .

[15]  H. Zwally,et al.  Derivation of Range and Range Distributions From Laser Pulse Waveform Analysis for Surface Elevations, Roughness, Slope, and Vegetation Heights , 2012 .

[16]  M. Fladeland,et al.  Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation , 2003 .

[17]  H. Zwally.  ICESat's Laser Measurements of Polar Ice and Atmospheres , 2003 .

[18]  J. Reid.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2003 .

[19]  R. Lucas,et al.  A review of remote sensing technology in support of the Kyoto Protocol , 2003 .

[20]  T. Dawson,et al.  Quantifying forest above ground carbon content using LiDAR remote sensing , 2004 .

[21]  N. Coops,et al.  High Spatial Resolution Remotely Sensed Data for Ecosystem Characterization , 2004 .

[22]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  Three-dimensional Structure of an Old-growth Pseudotsuga-Tsuga Canopy and Its Implications for Radiation Balance, Microclimate, and Gas Exchange , 2004, Ecosystems.

[23]  John D. Vona,et al.  Vegetation height estimation from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission and National Elevation Datasets , 2004 .

[24]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  A Continuous Satellite-Derived Measure of Global Terrestrial Primary Production , 2004 .

[25]  W. Cohen,et al.  Estimates of forest canopy height and aboveground biomass using ICESat , 2005 .

[26]  D. Harding,et al.  ICESat waveform measurements of within‐footprint topographic relief and vegetation vertical structure , 2005 .

[27]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Improvements of the MODIS terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set , 2005 .

[28]  W. Walker,et al.  Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using waveform lidar: Validation of montane ecosystems , 2005 .

[29]  Michael A. Lefsky,et al.  Revised method for forest canopy height estimation from Geoscience Laser Altimeter System waveforms , 2007 .

[30]  A. Neuenschwander,et al.  Characterization of ICESat/GLAS waveforms over terrestrial ecosystems: Implications for vegetation mapping , 2008 .

[31]  K. Ranson,et al.  Forest vertical structure from GLAS : An evaluation using LVIS and SRTM data , 2008 .

[32]  R. Nelson,et al.  Estimating Siberian timber volume using MODIS and ICESat/GLAS. , 2009 .

[33]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Comparative analysis of SRTM–NED vegetation canopy height to LIDAR‐derived vegetation canopy metrics , 2009 .

[34]  S. Los,et al.  Uncertainty within satellite LiDAR estimations of vegetation and topography , 2010 .

[35]  H. Jones,et al.  Remote Sensing of Vegetation: Principles, Techniques, and Applications , 2010 .

[36]  Qi Chen.  Retrieving vegetation height of forests and woodlands over mountainous areas in the Pacific Coast region using satellite laser altimetry , 2010 .

[37]  M. Lefsky.  A global forest canopy height map from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer and the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System , 2010 .

[38]  Wenze Yang,et al.  Physically based vertical vegetation structure retrieval from ICESat data: Validation using LVIS in White Mountain National Forest, New Hampshire, USA , 2011 .

[39]  A. Strahler,et al.  NACP New England and Sierra National Forests Biophysical Measurements: 2008-2010 , 2011 .

[40]  Woo-Kyun Lee,et al.  Estimating Crown Variables of Individual Trees Using Airborne and Terrestrial Laser Scanners , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[41]  A. Baccini,et al.  Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne lidar , 2011 .

[42]  W. Salas,et al.  Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Christopher A. Barnes,et al.  Completion of the 2006 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States. , 2011 .

[44]  Wenze Yang,et al.  Assessment of the impacts of surface topography, off-nadir pointing and vegetation structure on vegetation lidar waveforms using an extended geometric optical and radiative transfer model , 2011 .

[45]  M. Lefsky,et al.  Impact of footprint diameter and off-nadir pointing on the precision of canopy height estimates from spaceborne lidar , 2011 .

[46]  Christiane Schmullius,et al.  Influence of Surface Topography on ICESat/GLAS Forest Height Estimation and Waveform Shape , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[47]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Lidar sampling for large-area forest characterization: A review , 2012 .

[48]  Sungho Choi,et al.  Allometric Scaling and Resource Limitations Model of Tree Heights: Part 2. Site Based Testing of the Model , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[49]  Brian W. Barrett,et al.  Oak Ridge National Laboratory , Oak Ridge , TN , 2022 .