The Use of Management Control Systems (Mcs) Information in the Small Business Sector and the Relationship between Mcs, Strategy and Performance

This paper is based on an analysis of 183 responses from managing directors of small Finnish companies. The study describes the extent to which small Finnish firms have adopted traditional and contemporary MCS practices and how systematically they use the MCS information. Additionally, the use of MCS information is examined in a contingency framework that includes strategy (harvest, hold and build) and past financial performance of firms. The emergent results of this research suggest at least two contributions to the current literature on MCS. First, the study provides insights on a little known diffusion of the use of MCS information and practices in the small business sector. The evidence suggests that, overall, small Finnish firms have widely adopted various MCS practices and do use quite comprehensive MCS information. A second contribution of this research pertains to the relationship between MCS, strategy and past performance, especially in the context of small business. The findings based on the structural equation modeling (SEM) approach indicate that strategy has a significant impact on the use of MCS information. Nevertheless, the use of MCS information has no significant impact on the performance of the small Finnish firms.

[1]  Robert A. Simons.  The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: New perspectives☆ , 1990 .

[2]  R. Chenhall.  Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future , 2003 .

[3]  R. Roslender.  Accounting for Strategic Positioning: Responding to the Crisis in Management Accounting1 , 1995 .

[4]  Michael J. Peel,et al.  How planning and capital budgeting improve SME performance , 1998 .

[5]  Michael Bromwich,et al.  THE CASE FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING: THE ROLE OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION... , 1990 .

[6]  E. Laitinen.  A dynamic performance measurement system: evidence from small Finnish technology companies , 2002 .

[7]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[8]  J. Pearce,et al.  The impact of grand strategy and planning formality on financial performance , 1987 .

[9]  Christopher John Guilding,et al.  Competitor-focused accounting: an exploratory note , 1999 .

[10]  G. Reid,et al.  The impact of contingencies on management accounting system development , 2000 .

[11]  Karen S. Cravens,et al.  An International Comparison of Strategic Management Accounting Practices , 2000 .

[12]  Teemu Malmi,et al.  Activity-based costing diffusion across organizations: an exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms , 1999 .

[13]  G. Reid,et al.  Editorial. Problems, challenges and opportunities: the small business as a setting for management accounting research , 2000 .

[14]  F. Gul,et al.  The effects of management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and decentralization on managerial performance: A test of three-way interaction , 1994 .

[15]  P. Davidsson,et al.  Arriving at the high growth firm , 2003 .

[16]  R. Roslender.  RELEVANCE LOST AND FOUND: CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON THE PROMISE OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING , 1996 .

[17]  Christopher S. Chapman,et al.  Reflections on a contingent view of accounting , 1997 .

[18]  Nabil A. Ibrahim,et al.  The Relationship between Planning Sophistication and Performance in Small Businesses , 1998 .

[19]  Robert A. Simons.  Accounting control systems and business strategy: An empirical analysis , 1987 .

[20]  A. N. Oppenheim,et al.  Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement , 1992 .

[21]  R. Wallace,et al.  Nonresponse bias in mail accounting surveys: A pedagogical note , 1988 .

[22]  Markus Granlund,et al.  Towards Increasing Business Orientation: Finnish Management Accountants in a Changing Cultural Context , 1998 .

[23]  David J. North,et al.  The characteristics and strategies of high growth SMEs , 1995 .

[24]  K. Langfield-Smith,et al.  Antecedents to management accounting change: a structural equation approach , 2003 .

[25]  Charles B. Shrader,et al.  Effects of Formal Strategic Planning on Financial Performance in Small Firms: A Meta-Analysis , 1993 .

[26]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Linking control systems to business unit strategy: impact on performance , 1985 .

[27]  Vincent K. Chong,et al.  Strategic Choices, Environmental Uncertainty and SBU Performance: A Note on the Intervening Role of Management Accounting Systems , 1997 .

[28]  Kim Langfield-Smith,et al.  Management control systems and strategy: A critical review☆ , 1997 .

[29]  Taylor Randall,et al.  Performance Implications of Strategic Performance Measurement in Financial Services Firms , 2003 .

[30]  P. Grant,et al.  The Evolution of Management Accounting Routines in Small Businesses: A Social Construction Perspective , 2000 .

[31]  J. B. Orris,et al.  Formalized Planning in Small Business: Increasing Strategic Choices , 1994 .

[32]  Zahirul Hoque,et al.  Linking Balanced Scorecard Measures to Size and Market Factors: Impact on Organizational Performance , 2000 .

[33]  Vijay Govindarajan,et al.  Strategic Cost Management: The New Tool for Competitive Advantage , 1993 .

[34]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Cost & Effect: Using Integrated Cost Systems to Drive Profitability and Performance , 1997 .

[35]  Stephen C. Perry,et al.  The Relationship between Written Business Plans and the Failure of Small Businesses in the U.S. , 2001 .

[36]  R. Wallace,et al.  Nonresponse bias in mail accounting surveys: A pedagogical extension , 1990 .

[37]  Michael D. Shields,et al.  The design and effects of control systems: tests of direct- and indirect-effects models , 2000 .

[38]  Vijay Govindarajan,et al.  Incentive compensation design, strategic business unit mission, and competitive strategy , 1993 .

[39]  Cynthia K. Riemenschneider,et al.  What small business executives have learned about managing information technology , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[40]  Jan Greve,et al.  Forms of contingency fit in management accounting research—a critical review , 2004 .

[41]  K. Langfield-Smith,et al.  The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: an empirical investigation using a systems approach , 1998 .

[42]  Michael D. Shields,et al.  Mapping Management Accounting: Graphics and Guidelines for Theory-Consistent Empirical Research , 2003 .

[43]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Business Unit Strategy, Managerial Characteristics, and Business Unit Effectiveness at Strategy Implementation , 1984 .

[44]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  Robert A. Simons,et al.  Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal , 1994 .

[46]  P. Marriott,et al.  Professional Accountants and the Development of a Management Accounting Service for the Small Firm: Barriers and Possibilities , 2000 .

[47]  Teresa Joyce Covin,et al.  How Nonfinancial Performance Measures Are Used , 1998 .

[48]  E. Laitinen.  Framework for small business performance measurement : towards integrated PM systems , 1996 .

[49]  Richard G P Mcmahon.  Business Growth and Performance and the FinancialReporting Practices of Australian Manufacturing SMEs , 2001 .

[50]  Gavin Cassar,et al.  Planning Behavior Variables in Small Firms , 2002 .

[51]  David Otley,et al.  Performance Management: A Framework for Management Control Systems Research , 1999 .

[52]  V. Govindarajan.  Appropriateness of accounting data in performance evaluation: An empirical examination of environmental uncertainty as an intervening variable☆ , 1984 .

[53]  Anita E. Tobiassen,et al.  Accountants as Sources of Business Advice for Small Firms , 2004 .

[54]  S. Hart,et al.  Integrating Management Accounting and Marketing in the Pursuit of Competitive advantage: the case for strategic management accounting , 2002 .

[55]  K. Langfield-Smith,et al.  Adoption and benefits of management accounting practices: an Australian study , 1998 .

[56]  Ferdinand A. Gul,et al.  The Effects of Management Accounting Systems and Environmental Uncertainty on Small Business Managers' Performance , 1991 .

[57]  D. Storey.  Understanding the small business sector , 1994 .

[58]  A. Panter,et al.  Writing about structural equation models. , 1995 .