Kernel and stochastic expectation maximization fusion for target detection in hyperspectral imagery

In this paper, we present a new algorithm for target detection using hyperspectral imagery. The proposed algorithm is inspired by the outstanding performance of nonlinear RX-algorithm and the robustness of the stochastic expectation maximization (SEM) algorithm. The traditional technique of using SEM algorithm for target detection in hyperspectral imagery is associated with dimensionality reduction of the input data using binning or principal components analysis (PCA) algorithm. Although, the data reduction of the input data is enforced to reduce the computational burden on SEM algorithm, but it affects the results of target detection, especially the challenging one, due to not using the entire information of the potential targets. To facilitate detection of the target by using the entire targets information and simultaneously reducing the computational burden on SEM algorithm, we propose a new scheme for data reduction based on using Kernels. Kernel-based input data reduction is a nonlinear filtering technique in which the input data are mapped to the feature space where most of the background data is filtered using an easily selected threshold. Then, Gaussian mixture model is generated for the reduced input-data and SEM algorithm is employed to estimate the model parameters and to classify that input data. Finally, we allocated the target's class and isolated the target pixels. The proposed scheme for fusion the kernel with SEM algorithm has been tested using real life hyperspectral imagery and the results show superior performance compared to alternate algorithms.

[1]  Christopher J. Willis Mixture models for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery , 2004, SPIE Security + Defence.

[2]  Xiaoli Yu,et al.  Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[3]  Pedro E. López-de-Teruel,et al.  Nonlinear kernel-based statistical pattern analysis , 2001, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[4]  D. Chauveau A stochastic EM algorithm for mixtures with censored data , 1995 .

[5]  Russell M. Mersereau,et al.  On the impact of PCA dimension reduction for hyperspectral detection of difficult targets , 2005, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[6]  Lawrence E. Hoff,et al.  Comparison of SEM and linear unmixing approaches for classification of spectral data , 1999, Optics & Photonics.

[7]  Noise-adjusted non orthogonal linear projections for hyperspectral data analysis , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[8]  Mohammad S Alam,et al.  Spectral fringe-adjusted joint transform correlation. , 2010, Applied optics.

[9]  Gary A. Shaw,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Processing for Automatic Target Detection Applications , 2003 .

[10]  M. S. Alam,et al.  Target detection in hyperspectral imagery using one-dimensional fringe-adjusted joint transform correlation , 2006, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[11]  E. M. Winter,et al.  Anomaly detection from hyperspectral imagery , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[12]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  Some fundamentals and methods for hyperspectral image data analysis , 1999, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[13]  Jing Wang,et al.  Applications of Independent Component Analysis in Endmember Extraction and Abundance Quantification for Hyperspectral Imagery , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Comparative analysis of hyperspectral adaptive matched filter detectors , 2000, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[15]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[16]  Wojciech Pieczynski,et al.  Algorithm and Unsupervised Segmentation of Satellite Images , 1993 .

[17]  M. I. Elbakary,et al.  Pattern recognition in multiband imagery using stochastic expectation maximization , 2006, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[18]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  Covariance Matrix Estimation and Classification With Limited Training Data , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  H. Muhammed Characterizing and Estimating Fungal Disease Severity in Wheat , 2004 .

[20]  Heesung Kwon,et al.  Kernel RX-algorithm: a nonlinear anomaly detector for hyperspectral imagery , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[21]  M S Alam,et al.  Fast registration and reconstruction of aliased low-resolution frames by use of a modified maximum-likelihood approach. , 1998, Applied optics.