Understanding and supporting histopathology slide sorting

ABSTRACT Histopathology laboratories devote considerable time and effort to sorting tissue sample slides. We observed slide sorting in a typical urban hospital to understand the existing workflow and explore how it might be supported by an interactive computer support system. We observed 8.5 hours of slide sorting activity through a video camera mounted above a laboratory workbench. Through detailed video analysis, we characterised the process, examined which activities took the most time, and explored design considerations. We found that a very large proportion (23.5%) of the slide sorting time involved managing paper documents. We suggest that an interactive computer support system could automatically detect which slides are sorted into which folders and digitally list additional slides to include with these sets; this would support the workflow of technicians, while eliminating paper management and manual barcode reading operations, leading to time savings of approximately 30%. Additional recommendations for the design of such a support system include focusing on case management (e.g. how many slides belong to each case, whether a complete case will fit within the current folder, and which slides associated with a case are still missing), supporting recovery from disruptions, and enabling a flexible rather than a highly scripted workflow.

[1]  Shaimaa Al-Janabi,et al.  Digital pathology: current status and future perspectives , 2012, Histopathology.

[2]  Roy A. Ruddle,et al.  The Design and Evaluation of Interfaces for Navigating Gigapixel Images in Digital Pathology , 2016, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[3]  Gaetano Borriello,et al.  Labscape: A Smart Environment for the Cell Biology Laboratory , 2002, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[4]  David T. Sharbaugh,et al.  Histology Errors: Use of Real-Time Root Cause Analysis to Improve Practice , 2005 .

[5]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  Augmented assembly using a mobile phone , 2008, 2008 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[6]  Nicholas Walliman,et al.  Social research methods , 2006 .

[7]  Rebecca Randell,et al.  Working at the microscope: analysis of the activities involved in diagnostic pathology , 2012, Histopathology.

[8]  Gudrun Klinker,et al.  BioTISCH: the interactive molecular biology lab bench , 2010, CHI EA '10.

[9]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  The eLabBench in the wild: supporting exploration in a molecular biology lab , 2012, CHI.

[10]  David Muirhead,et al.  Pathology economic model tool: a novel approach to workflow and budget cost analysis in an anatomic pathology laboratory. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[11]  Andrew Huang,et al.  Computer-Controlled Machines for Pathology Slide Sorting and Cataloguing System , 2008 .

[12]  Stephanie Rosenthal,et al.  Augmenting on-screen instructions with micro-projected guides: when it works, and when it fails , 2010, UbiComp.

[13]  Anil V. Parwani,et al.  Use of contextual inquiry to understand anatomic pathology workflow: Implications for digital pathology adoption , 2012, Journal of pathology informatics.

[14]  D. Dooley Social Research Methods , 1990 .

[15]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  The eLabBench: an interactive tabletop system for the biology laboratory , 2011, ITS '11.

[16]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  Needs and workflow assessment prior to implementation of a digital pathology infrastructure for the US Air Force Medical Service , 2013, Journal of pathology informatics.

[17]  Sonja Stork,et al.  The Influence of Instruction Mode on Reaching Movements during Manual Assembly , 2008, USAB.

[18]  Philipp Scholl,et al.  Wearable digitization of life science experiments , 2014, UbiComp Adjunct.

[19]  Lily Chen,et al.  Exploring the Use of Google Glass in Wet Laboratories , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[20]  René J Buesa,et al.  Adapting lean to histology laboratories. , 2009, Annals of diagnostic pathology.

[21]  Andreas Butz,et al.  A case study of object and occlusion management on the eLabBench, a mixed physical/digital tabletop , 2013, ITS.